Hillary Clinton

[Tom]

Looks like it runs in the family.....

[Robert Fischer]

Originally Posted by Tom

And 100 of those were stand-by medical personnel.

[ArlJim78]

Wall Street Goes "ALL IN" for Hillary Clinton

They own her and they know she's a sure bet to not rock the boat and will keep the gravy train a rolling. Of course it could get messy because she's also owned by people like George Soros, the Muslim Brotherhood and various mideast Islamic regimes.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

That was just upped to 48% for Trump.

No it wasn't, I just checked. Still 57.7 to 42.3.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by chadk66

he leads in so many states now I've lost count. Ahead in Ohio, PA, CO, NM, ME, CT, etc. etc. Florida too I believe. Might run the table aside from maybe CA and IL

Where do you get your numbers from, besides out of your rectum? According to poll averages compiled by the website 270towin.com Clinton is ahead by 6 in Pa.; by 1 in Co.; by 12 in NM.; by 7 in Me.; by 14 in Ct. and tied in Fl. Only in Ohio on you list is she behind by 2. she's also ahead in the state of etc.

[reckless]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Where do you get your numbers from, besides out of your rectum? According to poll averages compiled by the website 270towin.com Clinton is ahead by 6 in Pa.; by 1 in Co.; by 12 in NM.; by 7 in Me.; by 14 in Ct. and tied in Fl. Only in Ohio on you list is she behind by 2. she's also ahead in the state of etc.

If Hillary is such a lock in Pennsylvania -- a state where the GOP has not won since 1988(!) -- why did Obama come here to stump for her? I believe Michelle too is coming in soon. Same for Biden, Kaine, plus her numerous personal visits and millions of ad dollars??

I do not care about what the polls you want to hang your hat on say. She is losing Pennsylvania and she'll lose big. Same with Ohio, and I believe Colorado eventually goes Trump too. The other NE states mentioned above are staunchly Democratic so if she wins those two, so what! Plus, why would they even be in the conservation in the first place since they are true blue states?

Hillary simply cannot defend a bad Obama ecomony. She cannot defend her failed tenure as Secy of State. She cannot get past her anti-Second Amendment stance and her desire for gun control. Her global warming positions are laughable and she doesn't even realize that Pennsylvania is a coal and energy producing state.

Now, there are riots and terrorism in the streets and yet, the other day, Hillary defended and took the BLM stance calling out the cops. No wonder (not to me and other sane citizens) the national Fraternal Order of Police endorsed Trump for President. First time in ages, if ever.

In Pennsylvania, over 3 million former Democrats registered Republican these past 10-12 months, solely because of Trump. You think they are staying home?

Could you name me any of 1-2-3 states won by Mitt Romney that Hillary will win? I could name a bunch won by Obama that Trump wins. She's a goner, like it or not.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by reckless

If Hillary is such a lock in Pennsylvania -- a state where the GOP has not won since 1988(!) -- why did Obama come here to stump for her? I believe Michelle too is coming in soon. Same for Biden, Kaine, plus her numerous personal visits and millions of ad dollars??
Pennsylvania is a key state. Clinton is winning there but it would be foolish to take it for granted. Obama, Michelle Caine and Biden will be making visits to all the key states. I know that's hard for you to understand since Trump has no major Republicans campaigning for him. They are all voting against him.

I do not care about what the polls you want to hang your hat on say. She is losing Pennsylvania and she'll lose big. Same with Ohio, and I believe Colorado eventually goes Trump too. The other NE states mentioned above are staunchly Democratic so if she wins those two, so what! Plus, why would they even be in the conservation in the first place since they are true blue states?
Then why did you bring them up? You are the one who said they were going for Trump.Now you say they are staunchly Democratic. Which is it?

Hillary simply cannot defend a bad Obama ecomony. She cannot defend her failed tenure as Secy of State. She cannot get past her anti-Second Amendment stance and her desire for gun control. Her global warming positions are laughable and she doesn't even realize that Pennsylvania is a coal and energy producing state.
Almost everything in that paragraph is wrong; but then almost everything in every paragraph you write is wrong.

Now, there are riots and terrorism in the streets and yet, the other day, Hillary defended and took the BLM stance calling out the cops. No wonder (not to me and other sane citizens) the national Fraternal Order of Police endorsed Trump for President. First time in ages, if ever.
Two more cops killed two more unarmed black people and you think the problem is with BLM.

In Pennsylvania, over 3 million former Democrats registered Republican these past 10-12 months, solely because of Trump. You think they are staying home?
That is absolutely false. The real figures are that 61,000 changed party affiliation from Democratic to Republican; while 43,000 changed from Republican to Democratic. That is a net gain of 18,000 for the Republicans. There are currently 3,100,000 registered Republican voters in Pennsylvania. If you were correct, that means there were 100,000 in the state previously.

Could you name me any of 1-2-3 states won by Mitt Romney that Hillary will win? I could name a bunch won by Obama that Trump wins. She's a goner, like it or not.

There are not many states that Romney won that Hillary will win; maybe North Carolina, possibly Georgia. That's because Romney did not win many significant states.

fivethirtyeight.com puts the Odds of Hillary Clinton winning the presidency at 59.1%, up three points in the last two days.

[woodtoo]

BLM is a huge Soros/Ford foundation funded, Obama/Clintin backed problem
meant to distract and cause mayhem in inner cities. Your too G-D damned stupid to admit it, are you talking about the black officer who shot an Armed black man. BLM should be defending the officer not the armed criminal.

Like Tom says its time to get serious about these looters and rioters, the least they should do is water cannon them right to the Whitehouse steps, then they wouldn't have to go as far for their marching orders.

[Fager Fan]

If the press would publicize every time a white guy is shot or killed by the police, perhaps there'd be some perspective.

Obama is gleeful. He is a community rabble rouser and he's riled up blacks well. He loves it. It's a means to an end.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by mostpost

There are not many states that Romney won that Hillary will win; maybe North Carolina, possibly Georgia. That's because Romney did not win many significant states.

fivethirtyeight.com puts the Odds of Hillary Clinton winning the presidency at 59.1%, up three points in the last two days.

You must admit - it's much closer than you ever envisioned? A year ago, I would have given Trump zero chance, but I learned from the primaries. I understand it's a general election and not a primary, but Trump's nationalism/populism appeals to a lot of independents and a decent swath of Dems. But the electoral math still favors Hillary (or any Dem for that matter), as you've stated previously.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by reckless

In Pennsylvania, over 3 million former Democrats registered Republican these past 10-12 months, solely because of Trump. You think they are staying home?

The shift hasn't been that dramatic, but it's happened.

"Democrats currently lead Republicans in voter registration by a margin of nearly 919,000 voter margin, due in large part to the Democratic strongholds of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. That number, however, had been nearly 1 million prior to the April primary. There are currently more than 4.1 million Democrats on the voter rolls compared to nearly 3.2 million Republicans, according to data from the Pennsylvania Department of State.
Compared to 2014, however, the GOP has added significantly more voters to the registration rolls. Democrats gained about 6,000 voters over the last two years. Republicans gained nearly 145,000."

http://www.pennlive.com/politics/ind..._deadline.html

[reckless]

Originally Posted by mostpost

There are not many states that Romney won that Hillary will win; maybe North Carolina, possibly Georgia. That's because Romney did not win many significant states.

fivethirtyeight.com puts the Odds of Hillary Clinton winning the presidency at 59.1%, up three points in the last two days.

YOU regularly close-in your responses inside the quote box to our posts and comments and you deliberately do this because you know it will be more difficult for us to reply and comment on your stupidity and anger.

Nicer people than I have already asked you to stop this practice.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by reckless

YOU regularly close-in your responses inside the quote box to our posts and comments and you deliberately do this because A) "you know it will be more difficult for us to reply" and comment on your stupidity and anger.

B) Nicer people than I have already asked you to stop this practice.

It's highly annoying.

MP, just quote the post, then put a letter in front of the quote.

Example:

A) You're correct on this matter reckless.

B) I'm sure everyone would appreciate if he stopped.

[reckless]

Originally Posted by reckless. The quoted are from my original post; the bold drivel is mostpost's typical nonsense. My reply to this silliness follows, in italiics..

If Hillary is such a lock in Pennsylvania -- a state where the GOP has not won since 1988(!) -- why did Obama come here to stump for her? I believe Michelle too is coming in soon. Same for Biden, Kaine, plus her numerous personal visits and millions of ad dollars??

Pennsylvania is a key state. Clinton is winning there but it would be foolish to take it for granted. Obama, Michelle Caine and Biden will be making visits to all the key states. I know that's hard for you to understand since Trump has no major Republicans campaigning for him. They are all voting against him.

Considering that Democrats have won Pennsylvania every election since 1988 the added stumping by Democrat leaders is much more significant than simply saying "Pennsylvania is a key state."

I do not care about what the polls you want to hang your hat on say. She is losing Pennsylvania and she'll lose big. Same with Ohio, and I believe Colorado eventually goes Trump too. The other NE states mentioned above are staunchly Democratic so if she wins those two, so what! Plus, why would they even be in the conservation in the first place since they are true blue states?

Then why did you bring them up? You are the one who said they were going for Trump.Now you say they are staunchly Democratic. Which is it?

I never ever cited a poll as a reason for why I know Trump will win. Been saying this throughout this thread and only referred to polls to stick it to those such as yourself to make a point. I alone have been saying from Day One that Trump will win Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida and Michigan, And I never referred to polls and please note that all the polls and current thinking never had Trump winning, did they. You are trying to create a false narrative by mentioning me and polls in the same sentence. BTW, anyone living and dying on anything Nate Silver says is a fool. He's a nut, a fraud and a phony.

Hillary simply cannot defend a bad Obama ecomony. She cannot defend her failed tenure as Secy of State. She cannot get past her anti-Second Amendment stance and her desire for gun control. Her global warming positions are laughable and she doesn't even realize that Pennsylvania is a coal and energy producing state.

Almost everything in that paragraph is wrong; but then almost everything in every paragraph you write is wrong.

Wrong you say? Then advocate for Hillary and defend the Obama's economy. Then Clinton's defend tenure as Secy of State, especially pertaining to the Russian re-set, Egypt, Benghazi and ISIS. Then once done, do you believe Hillary does want to or doesn't want to impose federal and national gun control... repeal the 2nd Amendment thru the Supreme Court... put in more global warming laws ... deliberately try to end the coal industry by closing the pits and putting an end to the miners lives as well as their jobs. And according to my post above, you say everything I wrote was wrong??

Now, there are riots and terrorism in the streets and yet, the other day, Hillary defended and took the BLM stance calling out the cops. No wonder (not to me and other sane citizens) the national Fraternal Order of Police endorsed Trump for President. First time in ages, if ever.

Two more cops killed two more unarmed black people and you think the problem is with BLM.

Considering the entire Soros financed movement, beginning with Hands Up Don't Shoot, I Can't Breathe, and BLM are based on a fraud and a phony event, yes the problem is Hillary, Obama, the Democrats and liberal media. Now, Hillary prefers to aligned with these issues and the American people know who they want for a leader and a president.

[quote]In Pennsylvania, over 3 million former Democrats registered Republican these past 10-12 months, solely because of Trump. You think they are staying home?/[quote]
That is absolutely false. The real figures are that 61,000 changed party affiliation from Democratic to Republican; while 43,000 changed from Republican to Democratic. That is a net gain of 18,000 for the Republicans. There are currently 3,100,000 registered Republican voters in Pennsylvania. If you were correct, that means there were 100,000 in the state previously.

I got my numbers wrong. you are right; and thanks to Saratoga Mike; he is right too.

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

It's highly annoying.

MP, just quote the post, then put a letter in front of the quote.

Example:

A) You're correct on this matter reckless.

B) I'm sure everyone would appreciate if he stopped.

I've mentioned that to Mostpost before.
When he does that , it is hard to separate what the original author said and what Mostpost is saying.
I think that it is ignorant of him to continue that practice.
He obviously hasn't learned how to parse text and comment on it using brackets.
I refuse to read his emboldened comments in another persons quote box.