Hillary Clinton

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by Tom

What kind of a cruel, inhumane monster would lie to the face of the parents of a hero killed on duty?

How can anyone justify this worthless bitch?
She is one sick, demented piece of garbage.

The same kind of monster that will do anything to be in power.

[Greyfox]

Crises of Character.

Former security guard is saying that she doesn't have the temperament to be a leader of the country.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/499991504...#sp=show-clips

[Marshall Bennett]

Hillary's demise may well be getting a kick-start today. She's no good.

[Clocker]

Looks like the Washington Post isn't completely in the bag for the left.

Headline:

'Hillary Clinton's email story continues to get harder and harder to believe.'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/28/hillary-clintons-email-story-continues-to-get-harder-and-harder-to-believe/

[Tom]

Like the democrat version of the Benghazi report - mentions TRUMP 23 times!

Nothing but fodder for fools, like many who post here.
How could Trump have a thing to do with it, unless you are a brainless fool?

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by Clocker

Looks like the Washington Post isn't completely in the bag for the left.

Headline:

'Hillary Clinton's email story continues to get harder and harder to believe.'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/28/hillary-clintons-email-story-continues-to-get-harder-and-harder-to-believe/

The hag is so disgusting most of the loyal followers are jumping ship. My girlfriend gets the Sunday Washington Post, they are pretty far to the left. You can't even avoid leftist BS when reading the sport's page.

[reckless]

The Washington Post has assigned 20+ hardened and seasoned reporters to do a hatchet job on Donald Trump. They are tracking down waiters and hotel maids from 25 years ago at every hotel he ever owned just looking for anyone to simply say: "Yes, Donald Trump fired me." Or "Donald Trump once said I work too slow". Stupid b-s and exaggerations.

Yet, Hillary Clinton was almost indicted once years ago, and could very well get indicted again soon as she is under a federal criminal investigation, and not one serious investigative reporter from The Washington Post is assigned to check any of all this. It isn't funny but I'll include one nonetheless.

[Tom]

Every few years, I get a colonoscopy.
I find the Washington Post essential to the process.

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by reckless

The Washington Post has assigned 20+ hardened and seasoned reporters to do a hatchet job on Donald Trump.

The Post doesn't have '20+ hardened and seasoned reporters'.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by Clocker

The Post doesn't have '20+ hardened and seasoned reporters'.

Statement adjusted for the times.... in real world terms 15 yes'em interns, 4 goffers and 1 leftist editor.

[mostpost]

26 Ways in which the Republicans on the Select Committee ignored House Rules, lied, cheated and shut out Democratic members of the committee.
A. Republicans admitted that their purpose in establishing the Select Committee
was to attack Secretary Clinton’s candidacy for President. 262
B. Republicans targeted Secretary Clinton from the beginning. 263
C. Republicans proceeded with no Select Committee rules. 264
D. Republicans proceeded with an unlimited timeline and budget. 265
E. Republicans refused to define the scope of their investigation or identify the
questions the Select Committee was trying to answer. 266
F. Republicans abandoned their own hearing plan to focus on Secretary Clinton. 267
G. Republicans excluded Democrats from interviews and concealed exculpatory
evidence. 268
H. Republicans selectively released Sidney Blumenthal’s emails after proclaiming
that “serious investigations” do not make selective releases. 271
I. Republicans subpoenaed Sidney Blumenthal to conduct political opposition
research that has nothing to do with the attacks in Benghazi. 273
J. Republicans blocked the release of Sidney Blumenthal’s deposition transcript
showing numerous questions about the Clinton Foundation. 276
K. Republicans leaked inaccurate information about Cheryl Mills’ interview,
forcing Democrats to release her transcript to correct the public record. 281
L. Republicans began withholding interview transcripts in violation of House rules
to retaliate against Democratic efforts to correct the public record. 282
M. Republicans inaccurately accused Secretary Clinton of compromising a covert
CIA source. 285
N. Republicans held an 11-hour hearing with Secretary Clinton that was widely
condemned even by conservative commentators. 286
O. Republicans inaccurately inflated their interview numbers to counter criticism of
their glacial pace. 288
P. Republicans inaccurately claimed the State Department had not provided a single
“scrap” of paper. 288
Q. Republicans inaccurately claimed that no other committee had ever received
Ambassador Stevens’ emails. 289
R. Republicans issued a unilateral subpoena to retaliate against the Department of
Defense for exposing the Select Committee’s abuses. 290
S. Republicans exploited the attacks in Benghazi to raise money for political
campaigns. 292
T. Republicans threatened to withhold $700 million in State Department funding
supposedly to speed up document production. 294
FINDINGS 261
U. Republicans ignored a letter from 33 current and former U.S. ambassadors
explaining how the State Department actually works. 295
V. Republicans abandoned the Select Committee’s final two hearings on improving
security. 297
W. Republicans took a costly and unnecessary congressional delegation to Italy and
Germany. 299
X. Republicans used taxpayer funds to conduct one of the longest and most partisan
congressional investigations in history. 300
Y. Republicans drafted their partisan final report in secret with no input whatsoever
from nearly half of the Select Committee’s members. 301
Z. Republicans forfeited any credibility by delaying their report until the eve of the political conventions.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by Tom

Like the democrat version of the Benghazi report - mentions TRUMP 23 times!

Nothing but fodder for fools, like many who post here.
How could Trump have a thing to do with it, unless you are a brainless fool?

A brainless fool would think that Trump was mentioned because someone thought he had something to do with what happened back then. No surprise that you think that.

So, why was Trump mentioned and why are all the Republican sychophants making such a deal about it? I have not found all the instances where Trump is mentioned, but those I have found, the reason is always the same. In all the cases Trump is mentioned for repeating some unfounded or untrue allegation made by a Republican committee member.

The reason the Republicans are making such a deal of it is because they realize how obvious it is that this joke of an investigation had the sole purpose of trying to keep Hillary Clinton from being elected President. This is a vain attempt to deflect from that.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by mostpost

26 Ways in which the Republicans on the Select Committee ignored House Rules, lied, cheated and shut out Democratic members of the committee.
A. Republicans admitted that their purpose in establishing the Select Committee
was to attack Secretary Clinton’s candidacy for President. 262
B. Republicans targeted Secretary Clinton from the beginning. 263
C. Republicans proceeded with no Select Committee rules. 264
D. Republicans proceeded with an unlimited timeline and budget. 265
E. Republicans refused to define the scope of their investigation or identify the
questions the Select Committee was trying to answer. 266
F. Republicans abandoned their own hearing plan to focus on Secretary Clinton. 267
G. Republicans excluded Democrats from interviews and concealed exculpatory
evidence. 268
H. Republicans selectively released Sidney Blumenthal’s emails after proclaiming
that “serious investigations” do not make selective releases. 271
I. Republicans subpoenaed Sidney Blumenthal to conduct political opposition
research that has nothing to do with the attacks in Benghazi. 273
J. Republicans blocked the release of Sidney Blumenthal’s deposition transcript
showing numerous questions about the Clinton Foundation. 276
K. Republicans leaked inaccurate information about Cheryl Mills’ interview,
forcing Democrats to release her transcript to correct the public record. 281
L. Republicans began withholding interview transcripts in violation of House rules
to retaliate against Democratic efforts to correct the public record. 282
M. Republicans inaccurately accused Secretary Clinton of compromising a covert
CIA source. 285
N. Republicans held an 11-hour hearing with Secretary Clinton that was widely
condemned even by conservative commentators. 286
O. Republicans inaccurately inflated their interview numbers to counter criticism of
their glacial pace. 288
P. Republicans inaccurately claimed the State Department had not provided a single
“scrap” of paper. 288
Q. Republicans inaccurately claimed that no other committee had ever received
Ambassador Stevens’ emails. 289
R. Republicans issued a unilateral subpoena to retaliate against the Department of
Defense for exposing the Select Committee’s abuses. 290
S. Republicans exploited the attacks in Benghazi to raise money for political
campaigns. 292
T. Republicans threatened to withhold $700 million in State Department funding
supposedly to speed up document production. 294
FINDINGS 261
U. Republicans ignored a letter from 33 current and former U.S. ambassadors
explaining how the State Department actually works. 295
V. Republicans abandoned the Select Committee’s final two hearings on improving
security. 297
W. Republicans took a costly and unnecessary congressional delegation to Italy and
Germany. 299
X. Republicans used taxpayer funds to conduct one of the longest and most partisan
congressional investigations in history. 300
Y. Republicans drafted their partisan final report in secret with no input whatsoever
from nearly half of the Select Committee’s members. 301
Z. Republicans forfeited any credibility by delaying their report until the eve of the political conventions.

You can try and spin it all you want... . Obama and Clinton are Bloody on this. Clinton went in Ass Cover Mode while the attack was still going on... 5 times made mention of how to pin it on a video so as to shield from the failure of their policy. While Americans Died.

Even the Dem's committee said Security at the annex was woefully inadequate and that many request had been ignored.

[ArlJim78]

A collection by the Weekly Standard comparing public versus private statements of the administration on Benghazi. It's a travesty that these gutter level liars have not been run out of town or put behind bars.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-be...rticle/2003058

[Parkview_Pirate]

Wow, a list of 26 reasons why the vast, right-wing conspiracy is alive and well.

The Hag's insistence that the rest of "move on" tells us much about her - and those that support her.