 |
|
11-22-2020, 01:10 AM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oughtoh
Trump did thank the Judge for doing it in such a timely matter and not drawing it out. Just one step closer to the Supreme Court.
|
No.
It was dismissed with prejudice which means no appeals on those grounds.
Pretty remarkable that a Republican Federalist Society Judge tossed this thing on its ass... viciously... and you folks still think there is "there" there.
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 02:13 AM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3,641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Lower court decisions often get overturned, especially when rendered by a progressive, activist judge, which this guy likely is.
|
So now a Republican Federalist Society Judge who is a longtime and well-known Republican in PA is a Progressive?
Talk about trying to say green is yellow and twist reality to your agenda.
Surely you must feel foolish.
Last edited by clicknow; 11-22-2020 at 02:14 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 05:07 AM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clicknow
So now a Republican Federalist Society Judge who is a longtime and well-known Republican in PA is a Progressive?
Talk about trying to say green is yellow and twist reality to your agenda.
Surely you must feel foolish.
|
Boxcar and I wagered on the outcome of this election. He was to never post on this board again if Trump lost, and vice versa.
Guess he is grasping at real flimsy straws as the end of his tenure draws nigh.
Assuming he honors our bet.
Over, under?
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum. 
Last edited by hcap; 11-22-2020 at 05:08 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 11:27 AM
|
#19
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Boxcar and I wagered on the outcome of this election. He was to never post on this board again if Trump lost, and vice versa.
Guess he is grasping at real flimsy straws as the end of his tenure draws nigh.
Assuming he honors our bet.
Over, under?
|
Is this true?? Gonna need to see the agreement
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:25 PM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
Is this true?? Gonna need to see the agreement
|
Well...that's easy. Just tell Hcap to drop 'em, bend over and spread 'em.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:30 PM
|
#21
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
I thought you believed in Jesus and "turn the other cheek" (not that cheek).
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:30 PM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
The Judge is Matthew Brann a longtime and well-known Republican in Pennsylvania.
"The answer to invalidated ballots is not to invalidate millions more," Brann wrote.
Brann called the legal reasoning behind the Trump campaign's Equal Protection claim "Frankenstein's Monster."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/21/polit...uit/index.html |
Too bad the courts didn't use that logic when putting their stamp of approval on Affirmative Action law, which by its nature is discriminatory.
Furthermore, the U.S. Constitution provides a remedy for the emergency situations like this. The good judge should keep his nose out of fictional monster books and pay more attention to reality.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:33 PM
|
#23
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
He's not he only Republican judge to come to this conclusion with Trumps' legal team batting 0/30.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:42 PM
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clicknow
So now a Republican Federalist Society Judge who is a longtime and well-known Republican in PA is a Progressive?
Talk about trying to say green is yellow and twist reality to your agenda.
Surely you must feel foolish.
|
Actually, I don't.
Trump campaign statement on Pennsylvania ruling
“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.
"We will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit. There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats eliminated our opportunity to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania’s law denying independent review. This resulted in 682,777 ballots being cast illegally, wittingly or unwittingly. This is just an extension of the Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know.
"We are disappointed we did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately the censorship continues. We hope that the Third Circuit will be as gracious as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal one way or the other as expeditiously as possible. This is another case that appears to be moving quickly to the United States Supreme Court.”
— Rudy Giuliani, Attorney to President Trump and Jenna Ellis, Senior Legal Adviser to Trump 2020 Campaign
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/t...ylvania-ruling
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:49 PM
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
You liberals would be a laugh-a-minute if you weren't such pitifully pathetic fools. My initial gut feeling last night was right. The good PA judge is a liberal, an Obama-appointee, as Giulani pointed out.
Obama-Appointed Judge in PA Sends Outrageous Message to Trump Attorney
https://www.westernjournal.com/obama...rump-attorney/
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 01:57 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Well...that's easy. Just tell Hcap to drop 'em, bend over and spread 'em.
|
Our agreement is in black and white on the religious thread for all to see. So when are you leaving?
There are no conspiracy theories left to save your sorry ass.
Toot-a-loo schmuck.
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 02:26 PM
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Our agreement is in black and white on the religious thread for all to see. So when are you leaving?
There are no conspiracy theories left to save your sorry ass.
Toot-a-loo schmuck.
|
You mean you didn't print out a copy and stuff it in your sun-free zone along with all your other valuable possessions? 
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 02:31 PM
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
You mean you didn't print out a copy and stuff it in your sun-free zone along with all your other valuable possessions? |
You are getting more and more frantic and nervous as your end draws nigh.
Toot-a-loo schmuck
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 02:59 PM
|
#29
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
You mean you didn't print out a copy and stuff it in your sun-free zone along with all your other valuable possessions? |
This is intriguing. So do you plan to stop posting here?
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2020, 03:14 PM
|
#30
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
You liberals would be a laugh-a-minute if you weren't such pitifully pathetic fools. My initial gut feeling last night was right. The good PA judge is a liberal, an Obama-appointee, as Giulani pointed out.
Obama-Appointed Judge in PA Sends Outrageous Message to Trump Attorney
https://www.westernjournal.com/obama...rump-attorney/ |
Maybe if Giuliani had a better case, it wouldn't matter who appointed the judge. The Judge asked Giuliani
""You're alleging that the two individual plaintiffs were denied the right to vote. But at bottom, you're asking this court to invalidate more than 6.8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the Commonwealth. Could you tell me how this result could possibly be justified?"
Chris Christie echoed this statement today:
"They allege fraud outside the courtroom, but when they go inside the courtroom, they don't plead fraud and they don't argue fraud,"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
