Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-02-2019, 02:25 AM   #1
hpollock
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 10
Recommendations for modern books/academic papers for mathematical handicapping?

Does anyone have any recommendations for books or academic papers on mathematical handicapping that have been published within the last ten years?
hpollock is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-02-2019, 06:20 AM   #2
FakeNameChanged
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by hpollock View Post
Does anyone have any recommendations for books or academic papers on mathematical handicapping that have been published within the last ten years?
Not to disparage this approach, but why do you assume that mathematics is the answer? We sometimes have an idea, and then only look for answers that fit our mindset. Here's an interesting youtube video that's from 2013 by a Phd in statistics. I have to admit to not totally understanding the approach.

__________________
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
FakeNameChanged is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-04-2019, 04:37 AM   #3
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,650
here is one, might give you some ideas

Precision: Statistical and Mathematical Methods in Horse Racing
by C X Wong c 2011



welcome to the forum and good luck
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-04-2019, 10:32 AM   #4
zerosky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 374
There's plenty 'o papers out there, this one is from 2010

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...eural_networks

It uses Back-Propagation with Momentum, Quasi-Newton, Levenberg-Marquardt and Conjugate Gradient Descent learning algorithms

I read this is some forgotton physics paper once...

Two physicists working on confinement were asked to predict the result of a horse race involving N horses. The first did extensive analytic and Monte Carlo calculations, and came back months later with the solution to the problem, provided the horses were spherical. The second found a unique solution to the problem, but only in the limit that 1/(1-N) tended to infinity."

Last edited by zerosky; 08-04-2019 at 10:33 AM.
zerosky is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-04-2019, 05:38 PM   #5
lansdale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by hpollock View Post
Does anyone have any recommendations for books or academic papers on mathematical handicapping that have been published within the last ten years?

Your question is somewhat open-ended, so I'll just throw a few things out which might be clarified by your response.

If you follow this subject at all you might be aware of the work of Bill Benter, who has won somwhere in the range $1 billion using a mathematical model, beginning in the late 80s. Zjelko Raganojec has used similar techniques to a make a similar sum in Australia. Although now more than 25 years old, you might find it useful to take a look at 'Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets' which contains both Benter's original paper on the application of logit modelling to horseracing as well as the Bolton-Chapman paper on which it was based. The volume, a collection of academic papers on the title subject, was edited by Bill Ziemba, who is, himself, a valuable resource in this field.

A couple of books by Leighton Vaughn-Williams from the early aughts:

'Betting to Win'
'Information Efficiency in Financial and Betting Markets'

Vaughan-Williams is Professor of Economics and Director of Betting Research at the business school of Nottingham Trent University. You might consider shooting him an e-mail with your question.

Since the '90s, there has been an exponential growth in the mathematical analysis of gambling in the academic world, as you may know. One of the most prominent and from what I understand, successful figures to have emerged during tht time is Minggao Gu -- he has also collaborated, at times, with Benter. He has a number of academic papers online, with many, but not all, understandably behind a paywall.

One possible implication of Gu's recent work is that logit modelling may now be superseded, at least in Hong Kong, by more sophisticated mathematical tools. However, I know people still using it, and linear regression generally, with success in European and other parts of the world.

You might want to consider a search on the posts of Trifecta Mike and Magister Ludi on this site. Both were well-trained in advanced mathematics, and both described the diminishing returns from the use of linear techniques in U.S. horseracing. TM was part of a syndicate successfully employing Bayesian hierarchical methods, and ML referred to non-linear correlations as far more profitable than linear.

If you can make your question more specific, I'll try to answer in kind.
lansdale is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-04-2019, 05:59 PM   #6
lansdale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,506
Epstein

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whosonfirst View Post
Not to disparage this approach, but why do you assume that mathematics is the answer? We sometimes have an idea, and then only look for answers that fit our mindset. Here's an interesting youtube video that's from 2013 by a Phd in statistics. I have to admit to not totally understanding the approach.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gW0PO7g6pY
Re the comments of Richard Epstein on the difficult of making money from horseracing in your signature line, I believe this was from the first (1967) edition of 'Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic,' He changed his tune on this subject in the second edition (2009) of the book, in which he discusses profits from a specific genetic handicapping method. By chance, I happened to be in a long e-mail exchange with Don Schlesinger, who is a close friend of Epstein, while he was helping the then-82-year-old author, edit the latter book, so read it more carefully.

Worth noting, imho, that although this is a classic book on gambling, that Epstein's expertise is fundamentally on casino games, which are, in themselves, mathematical systems. Note that he lumps the entirety of financial markets and horseracing into one chapter on 'Statistical Betting' and 'Statistical Systems,' because of the 'real-world' element they share, and thus are not part of the subject he considers himself to be treating. Certainly there is much more known about making money in financial markets and even horseracing than is indicated here, and Epstein would be the first to agree.

Last edited by lansdale; 08-04-2019 at 06:00 PM. Reason: grammar
lansdale is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-05-2019, 12:37 PM   #7
Magister Ludi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 441
Google Scholar is Your Friend

https://scholar.google.com/
Magister Ludi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-05-2019, 12:50 PM   #8
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magister Ludi View Post
Why? Who? Is that it?.....Low energy post.
ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-05-2019, 01:07 PM   #9
Magister Ludi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 441
clr: 1. linear regression cannot be effectively used with nonlinear functions 2. regression analysis is not appropriate for most racetrack betting markets 3. clr is highly effective for removing calcium, lime, and rust
Magister Ludi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-05-2019, 01:09 PM   #10
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magister Ludi View Post
clr: 1. linear regression cannot be effectively used with nonlinear functions 2. regression analysis is not appropriate for most racetrack betting markets 3. clr is highly effective for removing calcium, lime, and rust
Regurgitating much?....I know that's all you've got...
ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-05-2019, 01:23 PM   #11
Magister Ludi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall View Post
Why? Who? Is that it?.....Low energy post.
As much as I despise Elsevier, I won't help you to breach their paywall.
Magister Ludi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-06-2019, 09:50 AM   #12
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,563
Throw away the books, I say...whether they be "mathematical", or otherwise. In this game...nothing truly worth knowing will ever be sold in a book. Open a modest ADW account, so you can access the daily past performances for the price of a $2 bet...and then conduct your own independent investigation into the intricacies of this game. Any meaningful discoveries that are to be made will have to be uncovered by you alone. And if you are a relative beginner to this game, then consider yourself fortunate...because there will be a lot less that you'll have to UNLEARN.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-06-2019, 10:21 AM   #13
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,871
And when you practice, make REAL berts, not parper bets.
Even it is $2 bets - actual $$$ makes lessons sink in far easier than mnd bets. When you make those, all you can lose is your mind.
And the losing ticket cements it for you.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-06-2019, 10:36 AM   #14
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
And when you practice, make REAL berts, not parper bets.
Even it is $2 bets - actual $$$ makes lessons sink in far easier than mnd bets. When you make those, all you can lose is your mind.
And the losing ticket cements it for you.


Exactly...and I am kicking myself for leaving that out. When you paper-bet...you give yourself the impression that you are a lot more creative and courageous than you really are.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-06-2019, 10:48 AM   #15
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
I HAVE MANY (OUT OF YOUR PUBLISHING DATE RANGE), BUT THE WON I MOST HIGHLY RECOMMED IS BUTRON FABRICAND'S "HORSE SENSE", NOT SO MUCH FOR IT'S SELECTION PROCESS, BUT RATHER FOR HIS RACE RESULTS ANALYSIS.

I'LL ALSO RECOMMEND "EFFICIENCY OF RACETRACK BETTING MARKETS"
IT CONTAINTS OVER 50 PAPERS WRITTERN BY PEOPLE LIKE HAUSCH, ZIEMBA,LO, AND GET READY FOR THIS, HARRY H. LUDLOW, PRESENTLY THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL UNDER DONALD TRUMP (HEY, NO ONE IS PERFECT)

THOUGH READ IF YOU ARE NOT STATICALLY PROFICIENT, BUT THE CONCLUSIONS AFTER EACH PAPER ARE WORTH THE READ
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.