Bob Woodward

[Burls]

Get ready for a TWITTER TANTRUM!

The best part of it all:
After the Trump Team trashed Micheal Wolff's Fire and Fury when it came out on January 5 2018, Bob Woodward made sure to tape record all of his interviews so that, if pressed, he could substantiate his assertions.

And he's got HUNDREDS OF HOURS of tapes.

: pound:

[sour grapes]

big deal.trump being called an idiot is a step up from tillerson calling him a moron.

[PaceAdvantage]

I hope he plays the tape of Gary Cohn saying he swiped papers off of Trump's desk before he could sign them.

[reckless]

The timing is all wrong in releasing exerts of yet another piece of fiction by Bob Woodward. I would have figured this would have been released before the next GDP economic report, which should come in at or near 5 friggin' per cent !!

Anyhow, who in their right mind believes Bob Woodward?

Oh the hate Trumpers will believe but they have no credibity. The media will believe because they are ... the media. They are equally dishonest, patently corrupt and most of all stupid. They actually look up to Woodward, hard to believe. Just like the dolts who read them and watch them on TV.

[PaceAdvantage]

Next thing you know, they'll have Bernstein out there saying "This is worse than Watergate..."

Oh wait...

[lamboguy]

Originally Posted by reckless

The timing is all wrong in releasing exerts of yet another piece of fiction by Bob Woodward. I would have figured this would have been released before the next GDP economic report, which should come in at or near 5 friggin' per cent !!

Anyhow, who in their right mind believes Bob Woodward?

Oh the hate Trumpers will believe but they have no credibity. The media will believe because they are ... the media. They are equally dishonest, patently corrupt and most of all stupid. They actually look up to Woodward, hard to believe. Just like the dolts who read them and watch them on TV.

i think a better question is who believes any of them, Democrats, Republican's, liberals, conservatives, or the media from either side.

my story is that i went to vote in the primary election yesterday in Mass. i am in the district that had Capuano as its congressman. they had a guy running for Secretary of State that i wanted to vote for. i am registered as a Republican and they wouldn't let me vote on the Democrat side. i guess i understood that and had no problem with it, its the first time i had ever tried to vote in a primary. but in line there was another guy that was a Republican, the guy was originally from the Republic of Georgia, and they gave the man a real hard time and wouldn't give him a ballot and basically told him to take a hike. they put this guy through so much misery that i doubt he ever comes back to vote again ever.

in the regular elections they let you vote as anyone that you want, in the past i voted for Clinton, Gore and Obama vs. Romney. i voted for the Republican guy every other time since Nixon.

[davew]

Originally Posted by lamboguy

i think a better question is who believes any of them, Democrats, Republican's, liberals, conservatives, or the media from either side.

my story is that i went to vote in the primary election yesterday in Mass. i am in the district that had Capuano as its congressman. they had a guy running for Secretary of State that i wanted to vote for. i am registered as a Republican and they wouldn't let me vote on the Democrat side. i guess i understood that and had no problem with it, its the first time i had ever tried to vote in a primary. but in line there was another guy that was a Republican, the guy was originally from the Republic of Georgia, and they gave the man a real hard time and wouldn't give him a ballot and basically told him to take a hike. they put this guy through so much misery that i doubt he ever comes back to vote again ever.

in the regular elections they let you vote as anyone that you want, in the past i voted for Clinton, Gore and Obama vs. Romney. i voted for the Republican guy every other time since Nixon.

The Republic of Georgia used to be part of the Russian empire. It is good they did not let a Russian meddle with their election. (or are you saying he is now a US resident?)

Bob Woodward may have hundreds of hours of tapes, but only a 5 minute phone call with Trump.

[Burls]

Originally Posted by davew

Bob Woodward may have hundreds of hours of tapes, but only a 5 minute phone call with Trump.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-woodward-call

It's already started: Trump lies, as is his way, and Woodward has a tape proving that Trump lied.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday told The Daily Caller that he was never “given messages” that famed reporter Bob Woodward had tried to contact him to interview him for his new book about the Trump White House, and claimed he “probably would have spoken to him if he’d called.”

Instead of just wasting time with he said / he said, why not just release a tape of the call? So he did.

[Tom]

Does that fall under high crimes or misdemeanors?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Burls

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-woodward-call

It's already started: Trump lies, as is his way, and Woodward has a tape proving that Trump lied.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday told The Daily Caller that he was never “given messages” that famed reporter Bob Woodward had tried to contact him to interview him for his new book about the Trump White House, and claimed he “probably would have spoken to him if he’d called.”

Instead of just wasting time with he said / he said, why not just release a tape of the call? So he did.

Ummmm...but Woodward never did call Trump for an interview...that transcript was after the fact, with Woodward EXPLAINING to Trump all these times he tried to get in contact with him for the book, but was never able to get through.

Not seeing this proof of Trump lying. I'm sure it's there, but this transcript doesn't in fact prove any such thing.

Of course, I'm sure I'm missing something YUGELY obvious...because of bias of course.

[Burls]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Ummmm...but Woodward never did call Trump for an interview...that transcript was after the fact, with Woodward EXPLAINING to Trump all these times he tried to get in contact with him for the book, but was never able to get through.

Not seeing this proof of Trump lying. I'm sure it's there, but this transcript doesn't in fact prove any such thing.

Of course, I'm sure I'm missing something YUGELY obvious...because of bias of course.

Ummmmmm
Doofus Drumph said he would have spoken to Woodward had he called.
Woodward did call.
They did speak.
Drumph lied - big surprise there.

[Fred Mertz]

Originally Posted by Burls

Woodward did call.
They did speak.
Drumph lied - big surprise there.

The recorded call was conducted after the book was completed.


Woodward was unsuccessful getting past White House handlers to Trump while working on the book.


See PA Mike's reply above. He says the same thing.

[elysiantraveller]

This book is nothing but slanderous libel lies!!!!

If...

We changed the libel laws...

The President could, of course, sue all these accounts in court... and lose... but he can't do that because it would actually drag all of the stuff out.

You really can't make the shit up that comes out of his mouth.

Trump suggests changes to libel laws over Woodward book

But of course... you guys are right... its all lies.

[PaceAdvantage]

Nobody said it's ALL lies.

More fake news.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Nobody said it's ALL lies.

More fake news.

Except people in this thread... other threads... Cabinet Members... the Administration... the President...