Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-20-2023, 10:50 PM   #76
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,657
Wait...Clarence Thomas has a conservative bias?

OH

MY

GOD!

Who knew?
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 10:46 AM   #77
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
Horsey should do some research, as other Justices, even left-leaners, have also benifited from rich friends with vacations, gifts, and some, even from people WHO HAD DIRECT CASES BEFORE THE COURT AT THE TIME.


Come on, Horsey, you are smarter than the mostpost elk......
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 11:48 AM   #78
Inner Dirt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Posts: 12,721
What I want to know has any Republican played the race card over this yet?

Somebody please find me one.
Inner Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-22-2023, 09:39 AM   #79
cratman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 147
Yes most/all do it but still not right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Horsey should do some research, as other Justices, even left-leaners, have also benifited from rich friends with vacations, gifts, and some, even from people WHO HAD DIRECT CASES BEFORE THE COURT AT THE TIME.


Come on, Horsey, you are smarter than the mostpost elk......
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/u...and-gifts.html

In one year examined by NYT the leaders were 1) Breyer, 2) Sotamayor, and 3) Ginsburg. These were the same justices that would have protected Wall Street from disruptive innovation. Wonder who funded their freebies.

In their defense, my guess is Thomas would have been number 1 had he reported.
__________________
Cratman
cratman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-23-2023, 10:36 PM   #80
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Horsey should do some research, as other Justices, even left-leaners, have also benifited from rich friends with vacations, gifts, and some, even from people WHO HAD DIRECT CASES BEFORE THE COURT AT THE TIME.


Come on, Horsey, you are smarter than the mostpost elk......
I can't deny what you're saying here. Tom
Sooooo.....let's split the difference.....okay?
Nullify the bias that currently exists on SCOTUS, shouldn't we?

Getting rid of Clarence Thomas would bring that about.
Besides, he is a complete embarrassment to the office.
Then....after 2024.....we will know what the majority wants.
Any appointments that happen after that, so be it.
(Just to clarify, I'm not impaired in any way - just a dreamer)

Once again, you are way off the mark.
No.....I am nowhere near as smart as mostpost.
Nor, do I have a fraction of his patience to keep posting here.
He deserves The Medal of Honor for educating the morally deficient.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-23-2023, 10:38 PM   #81
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-23-2023, 10:45 PM   #82
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses View Post
Besides, he is a complete embarrassment to the office.
R A C I S T !
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-23-2023, 10:48 PM   #83
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,658
I heard today that Ruth Gator Ginsburg did the same thing.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-24-2023, 12:27 AM   #84
ElKabong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by cratman View Post
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/u...and-gifts.html

In one year examined by NYT the leaders were 1) Breyer, 2) Sotamayor, and 3) Ginsburg. These were the same justices that would have protected Wall Street from disruptive innovation. Wonder who funded their freebies.

In their defense, my guess is Thomas would have been number 1 had he reported.
Excellent find. Now h4c can comment. Should the two living justices be impeached?

As for ginsberg, it's no surprise she was on the take bigtime
__________________
“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” -Joe Biden
ElKabong is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-24-2023, 10:19 AM   #85
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses View Post
I can't deny what you're saying here. Tom
Sooooo.....let's split the difference.....okay?
Nullify the bias that currently exists on SCOTUS, shouldn't we?

Getting rid of Clarence Thomas would bring that about.
Besides, he is a complete embarrassment to the office.
Then....after 2024.....we will know what the majority wants.
Any appointments that happen after that, so be it.
(Just to clarify, I'm not impaired in any way - just a dreamer)

Once again, you are way off the mark.
No.....I am nowhere near as smart as mostpost.
Nor, do I have a fraction of his patience to keep posting here.
He deserves The Medal of Honor for educating the morally deficient.
Then we'd have to impeach all the justices. Are you so naive as to believe that that judges don't have political biases? Or worldview biases? Moreover, not all biases are bad! Some people, by the grace of God, are biased toward the Good, while others are biased toward Evil. Also, some people by the grace of God, are sufficiently self-disciplined to set aside their biases when a situation call for it. Great example of this is with Thomas and Alito who lifted the stay on an abortion drug, even though both these justices voted to overturn Roe.

This world could not operate without biases.

And how in the world could the morally deficient educate anyone one on good morals? Mosty is the poster child of apologists for evil.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-24-2023, 07:01 PM   #86
OntheRail
Registered User
 
OntheRail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses View Post
I can't deny what you're saying here. Tom
Sooooo.....let's split the difference.....okay?
Nullify the bias that currently exists on SCOTUS, shouldn't we?

Getting rid of Clarence Thomas would bring that about.
Besides, he is a complete embarrassment to the office.
Then....after 2024.....we will know what the majority wants.
Any appointments that happen after that, so be it.
(Just to clarify, I'm not impaired in any way - just a dreamer)

Once again, you are way off the mark.
No.....I am nowhere near as smart as mostpost.
Nor, do I have a fraction of his patience to keep posting here.
He deserves The Medal of Honor for educating the morally deficient.
Only if we can remove the latest biased Judge... who is so far out there she could not define what a woman is. Till then Clarence Thomas is good as gold and needs to stay on the bench to counter the crazy ass leftist activist.

But I'll tell you what... now that they narrowed and defined the rules... if any of them fail to follow them as they are from this point forward. They should be fairly treated the same... and the chips fall where they may.

How bout that...
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.

Last edited by OntheRail; 04-24-2023 at 07:03 PM. Reason: To puke..
OntheRail is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-24-2023, 11:30 PM   #87
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
Tje bias on the court is documented to be ON THE LEFT.
We have seen numerous cases where the "right" justices have not voted together.

When do the LEFT jusyices ever not stick toggether?
So who we get rid of, the little bimbo with the anti-Triump bias?


Horsey, put on you nig boy pants and suck it up, have a nice cold can of Coke,
it's on Clarence......or is it Clarence is on it?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-27-2023, 09:33 PM   #88
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,658
Terrible, just terrible. I hope they go after all of those campaign donors that allow politicians use their property or facilities for illegal campaign donations and corruption if they are involved with any legislation, contracts or tax credits.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-28-2023, 05:10 PM   #89
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,822
Hey horsey……

The guys who matter want you to STFU

Read it here

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo...04.25.2023.pdf


https://www.revolver.news/2023/04/su...homas-scandal/


https://apnews.com/article/supreme-c...2269127458fa08
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!

Last edited by JustRalph; 04-28-2023 at 05:12 PM.
JustRalph is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-28-2023, 09:13 PM   #90
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
You can't get me to STFU, can you?
Just tell these VIPs to get in line.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.