Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.20 average.
Old 02-14-2016, 08:33 AM   #91
outofthebox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
Delta 8th race last night timer post finishing time way before finish. Off a 47 1/5 1/2 the timer pops up at 58 for final time. These fillies ran at least 1:00...
outofthebox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-14-2016, 04:38 PM   #92
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
Delta 8th race last night timer post finishing time way before finish. Off a 47 1/5 1/2 the timer pops up at 58 for final time. These fillies ran at least 1:00...
Guess they haven't gotten around to getting the button fixed yet. Such a slap to horseplayers.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-14-2016, 05:40 PM   #93
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Something is fishy with the 1/2 time for the Phoenix Gold Cup at TuP yesterday. Video showed 42.90, chart shows 44.00. It was a blazing fast track yesterday and the reported 44 seems slow to me believe it or not. Maybe 42.90 is too fast, but it was faster than 44 IMO.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-14-2016, 11:32 PM   #94
RXB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
Delta 8th race last night timer post finishing time way before finish. Off a 47 1/5 1/2 the timer pops up at 58 for final time. These fillies ran at least 1:00...
1:00.40 is about right.
RXB is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-14-2016, 11:41 PM   #95
RXB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Something is fishy with the 1/2 time for the Phoenix Gold Cup at TuP yesterday. Video showed 42.90, chart shows 44.00. It was a blazing fast track yesterday and the reported 44 seems slow to me believe it or not. Maybe 42.90 is too fast, but it was faster than 44 IMO.
The 42.90 from the teletimer seems about right to me. I have no idea why they changed it to 44.00.
RXB is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 12:10 AM   #96
RXB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,787
Here's the funny thing. When the teletimer screws up, often they're unaware.

Then the teletimer is right, but they think it's wrong and mess things up. They think 42.90 is too fast, even though the horse running in 4th position after 4f was 6 lengths off of the lead, and the eventual 1-2-3 finishers were running 7-4-6 after 4f (an unusual circumstance, to say the least). Plus they don't know enough to realize that when the final time is 1:07.73, an opening half-mile of 44.00 isn't really very fast comparatively and would be highly unlikely to cause such a total collapse of the 1-2-3 runners in the final 2f. And to top it off, they don't even know how to handtime their own track with semi-reasonable accuracy, which is really not all that difficult.
RXB is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 12:43 AM   #97
RXB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,787
I notice that they also changed that TuP 5 fraction at the 5f mark from the teletimed 54.94, which seems correct, to 55.84 which is definitely wrong.
RXB is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 12:49 AM   #98
EMD4ME
NoPoints4ME
 
EMD4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXB
Here's the funny thing. When the teletimer screws up, often they're unaware.

Then the teletimer is right, but they think it's wrong and mess things up. They think 42.90 is too fast, even though the horse running in 4th position after 4f was 6 lengths off of the lead, and the eventual 1-2-3 finishers were running 7-4-6 after 4f (an unusual circumstance, to say the least). Plus they don't know enough to realize that when the final time is 1:07.73, an opening half-mile of 44.00 isn't really very fast comparatively and would be highly unlikely to cause such a total collapse of the 1-2-3 runners in the final 2f. And to top it off, they don't even know how to handtime their own track with semi-reasonable accuracy, which is really not all that difficult.
EMD4ME is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:01 AM   #99
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXB
The 42.90 from the teletimer seems about right to me. I have no idea why they changed it to 44.00.
That was my thought too before having looked at video. On the raw pace/speed figures it fit well. I'll do some video work today.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:09 PM   #100
RXB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,787
Today some 12k claimers at Turf Paradise ran the opening half-mile of a 6f race in 43.64, and yesterday a female allowance runner went gate-to-wire with a 43.37 half, so why would they think that legit 75k older male stakes horses can't go 42.90?

The teletiming of the Phoenix Gold Cup was in line with other 6f races at TuP. I checked those races plus one other 6f race yesterday where the early fractions were much slower and they were all basically correct.

Now the question is: will they admit their mistake and change back to the correct teletimed fractions for the Gold Cup?
RXB is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:23 PM   #101
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXB
Today some 12k claimers at Turf Paradise ran the opening half-mile of a 6f race in 43.64, and yesterday a female allowance runner went gate-to-wire with a 43.37 half, so why would they think that legit 75k older male stakes horses can't go 42.90?

The teletiming of the Phoenix Gold Cup was in line with other 6f races at TuP. I checked those races plus one other 6f race yesterday where the early fractions were much slower and they were all basically correct.

Now the question is: will they admit their mistake and change back to the correct teletimed fractions for the Gold Cup?
I've asked Equibase about it, they'll get back to me.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:42 PM   #102
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,842
Can anyone time a race?
Is it really rocket science?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:45 PM   #103
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Can anyone time a race?
Is it really rocket science?
Why do you think I'm considering switching to Uber?
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 09:49 PM   #104
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,842
I hope you calibrate your meter!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-15-2016, 10:00 PM   #105
EMD4ME
NoPoints4ME
 
EMD4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Can anyone time a race?
Is it really rocket science?
It was said before and I will say it again.....

It's done on PURPOSE, so that certain people can extract an edge.

We have juiced up horses, jocks stiffing left and right and as if THAT'S not enough, mistiming to deal with.

Makes the hardcore people want to abandon the game.
EMD4ME is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.