Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Well...this entry didn't exactly look like something that a piece of sophisticated handicapping software would rate so highly...that's all. This...plus the fact that I had a decent wager on the double with the ...which lost by a nose on the wire.
|
Your absolutely correct thask...
I looked at 2 programs and the entry was not near the top..
and the one I thought was a lame horse ...WON
Lame by way of so many breaks in his PP's
and he closed from behind which most winners were close to lead
thats Parx for ya...
GB