|
|
11-16-2018, 12:34 AM
|
#1
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Julian Assange has been Charged
WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal, prosecutors inadvertently revealed in a recently unsealed court filing — a development that could significantly advance the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and have major implications for those who publish government secrets.
The disclosure came in a filing in a case unrelated to Assange. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, urging a judge to keep the matter sealed, wrote "due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged." Later, Dwyer wrote the charges would "need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...cid=spartandhp
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 02:47 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal, prosecutors inadvertently revealed in a recently unsealed court filing — a development that could significantly advance the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and have major implications for those who publish government secrets.
The disclosure came in a filing in a case unrelated to Assange. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, urging a judge to keep the matter sealed, wrote "due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged." Later, Dwyer wrote the charges would "need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...cid=spartandhp
|
Roger Stone, Jerome Corsi, and friends to follow. I think this may be why Trump has been sulking so much lately. It also appears Chumpy might have been getting updates on the Mueller probe from his inside man.... Whittaker
Btw, this was not "Q", but Mueller.
Last edited by hcap; 11-16-2018 at 02:55 AM.
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 06:30 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Roger Stone, Jerome Corsi, and friends to follow. I think this may be why Trump has been sulking so much lately. It also appears Chumpy might have been getting updates on the Mueller probe from his inside man.... Whittaker
Btw, this was not "Q", but Mueller.
|
Nothing like having a good wing man to have your back. If you don't believe me, ask Obama.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 09:10 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baystater
Posts: 3,494
|
So much for government transparency.
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 09:10 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
this surprises who? hell Mueller charged fourteen russians
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 10:21 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Nothing like having a good wing man to have your back. If you don't believe me, ask Obama.
|
Ah schucks, nobody to play with you on your superstition thread?
Why don't you introduce the book of "Limbaugh" as a new biblical interpretation, requiting understanding only a few dog whistles, conspiracy theories, a total lack of historical knowledge, and a decent AM radio?
'
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 06:01 PM
|
#7
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
According to sources, your last post is another example of you resorting to whataboutism.
FACT FREE.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 06:07 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 5,597
|
You all need to give Harry some slack....
I mean what does it say about a person who post here (seems like 50 times a day) about "its only a matter of time"?
How long has it been now? Personally, I don't give a shit either way as I am not TOTALLY ENGULFED as HCAP!
So, lets look at some hypotheticals.....'
1. Trump gone.....Puts Pence in......
HCAP, You gonna do the non-stop "Its only a matter of time" for Pence too???
2. Trump stays and we have to consistently check to ensure HCAP hasn't jumped from the nearest rooftop........
I seriously do not know anyone who has soooooo much invested !!!!
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed.
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 10:52 AM
|
#9
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
There is no way to win for hcap.
We all know that.
Personally, I have been banking 10-15 everyday for a huge celebration. Ooops, lost one!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 12:19 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtothegame
You all need to give Harry some slack....
I mean what does it say about a person who post here (seems like 50 times a day) about "its only a matter of time"?
How long has it been now? Personally, I don't give a shit either way as I am not TOTALLY ENGULFED as HCAP!
So, lets look at some hypotheticals.....'
1. Trump gone.....Puts Pence in......
HCAP, You gonna do the non-stop "Its only a matter of time" for Pence too???
2. Trump stays and we have to consistently check to ensure HCAP hasn't jumped from the nearest rooftop........
I seriously do not know anyone who has soooooo much invested !!!!
|
You are exaggerating my rightful objections as a "psychological obsession". Political opinions are strong on both sides. Personas attacks against leftists, liberals and never-Trumpers are part and parcel of the Trump supporters (Chumpsters) on PA OT. Known as
ad ho·mi·nem
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 04:45 PM
|
#11
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
ad ho·mi·nem
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
2. Referring to the POTUS as ORange instead of attacking his actions
3. Calling the POTUS a CHUMPSTER rather than critique his policies
4. See any post by hcap here - he is ad ho-mi-nem
See also hypocrite.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 06:21 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
ad ho·mi·nem
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
2. Referring to the POTUS as ORange instead of attacking his actions
3. Calling the POTUS a CHUMPSTER rather than critique his policies
4. See any post by hcap here - he is ad ho-mi-nem
See also hypocrite.
|
Political figures are permissible targets. According to PA.
Personal ad hominem attacks against me and other on the left are supposed to be off limits.
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 07:18 PM
|
#13
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
Well BS - YOU keep calling posters names, so get a hold of reality pal. YOU are everything you whine about US being.
FACT FILLED POST.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 01:54 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Well BS - YOU keep calling posters names, so get a hold of reality pal. YOU are everything you whine about US being.
FACT FILLED POST.
|
Only you when you insult me first.
|
|
|
11-19-2018, 10:28 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,649
|
It will be interesting to see what the charge is ...
0bama's DOJ felt they could not charge him for publishing top secret classified info, otherwise they would have to charge a few 'top' news organizations and reporters as well. They call it a 'New York Times problem.' This is a 2 year old article.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.cd8c8965afcd
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|