Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-21-2006, 05:44 AM   #1
Maverick58034
Registered User
 
Maverick58034's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 165
Lower Claiming Price and In For Tag in OC

Hey everyone,

I was curious as to your thoughts on horses that are either A) entered in for the lower end of the claiming prices (i.e. CLM10000(10-8), entered in for 8000), and B) entered in for a claiming price in an Optional Claming race (i.e. OC100k, in for 100,000 tag).

While I have not done any serious data studies, I have noticed that horses that meet either of these qualifications seem to win less than their counterparts. This could be a fluke, as I have not compiled reliable data (this is only an observation).

My thoughts in the situation are that in case A) the trainer could not find a race at the price he/she desires, so they make it work, or perhaps the racing secretary needs to fill the race, or maybe the trainer is trying to dump the horse off while still picking up a nice purse. In case B) It has always seemed to me that the trainer is really trying to get the horse claimed, and may not be in the best of shape.

Anywho, I was curious as to your guys thoughts on this.

--Mike
Maverick58034 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-21-2006, 05:49 AM   #2
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,830
I think with B, it just depends on the quality of the horses with allowance conditions in the race. The horses entered to be claimed are usually out of conditions, and not good enough for stakes.Towards the end of the year, and early in the year when written for horses 4yo and up, the claimers and usually stronger than the allowance horses.

A definite bad sign is a horse that meets the allowance conditions, but is still entered to be claimed. This doesn't happen all that often, but is worth noting when it does.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-21-2006, 06:57 AM   #3
ntheiroff
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bermuda Run, NC
Posts: 18
In A) there is usually a 2# allowance, if the horse is entered to be claimed for 8K. I never saw much sense in giving up $1000/#. I usually take it as though the owner/trainer WANTS to lose the horse.
__________________
http://www.saratogasteakhouse.com
ntheiroff is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-21-2006, 12:16 PM   #4
Pgh. Gere
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 87
Maverick

Agree with Cj as to scenario B, with Allowance / Optional claimers.

With A, that would be interesting to study. Be sure that those are open claimers you are looking at and that the LBs off is for price and not conditions, ie non winner since two months ago.

Another angle to look at, if the horse is entered for 8 and maybe switching to or using an apprentice rider. 5lb bug plus the other 2 etc. You may or may not consider weight into your handicapping, but trainers do. Riding with 113 or 115 verse the field all in at 122, may make the difference.
Pgh. Gere is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-21-2006, 01:57 PM   #5
Fastracehorse
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,443
My script.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maverick58034
Hey everyone,

I was curious as to your thoughts on horses that are either A) entered in for the lower end of the claiming prices (i.e. CLM10000(10-8), entered in for 8000), and B) entered in for a claiming price in an Optional Claming race (i.e. OC100k, in for 100,000 tag).

While I have not done any serious data studies, I have noticed that horses that meet either of these qualifications seem to win less than their counterparts. This could be a fluke, as I have not compiled reliable data (this is only an observation).

My thoughts in the situation are that in case A) the trainer could not find a race at the price he/she desires, so they make it work, or perhaps the racing secretary needs to fill the race, or maybe the trainer is trying to dump the horse off while still picking up a nice purse. In case B) It has always seemed to me that the trainer is really trying to get the horse claimed, and may not be in the best of shape.

Anywho, I was curious as to your guys thoughts on this.

--Mike
On A): If a horse is entered for 8k in a 10k-8k claimer the trainer gets a slight weight break. This can signal a live bet much like the bug does.

On B) Horses in for first time tags can be dangerous - I give them special attention.

I don't have exact stats for you either I just know that A) and B) are part of my arsenal for live ones.

fffastt
Fastracehorse is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-21-2006, 02:10 PM   #6
GlenninOhio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
A definite bad sign is a horse that meets the allowance conditions, but is still entered to be claimed. This doesn't happen all that often, but is worth noting when it does.
I think on balance you are correct, CJ, but a possible scenario for entering for the tag even though the conditions can be met is that the connections would prefer not to lose these conditions if the horse wins and either they don't feel the horse will be claimed or the tag is very high and/or well above what they're into the horse for (perhaps an $80k or $100k tag).

Under these admittedly very rare circumstances the horse would not be a toss.
GlenninOhio is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.