Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-10-2011, 06:52 PM   #1
toussaud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,005
Wilburn retired from racing

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...by-spendthrift


wow this pisses me off. Wilburn was really just starting to come into his own and was going to terrorize the handicap division next year. t his makes no sense to me. A grade 1 handicap win was all but certain next year for him.
toussaud is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 07:08 PM   #2
ManU918
Registered User
 
ManU918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,435
This really sucks. I have followed Wilburn from his first start and he was just starting to come around and they go and retire him. What a bunch of shit.
ManU918 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 07:54 PM   #3
PhantomOnTour
C'est Tout
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cajunland
Posts: 13,272
Aw great.
He was good enough to defeat Shackleford and Caleb's Posse in the Indy Dby, who seem to be two of the better 4yr olds heading to 2012, and NOW they retire him!?
A Gr1 win at 1m or longer in 2012 is not an unrealistic expectation for a colt like Wilburn, but nevermind.

Coulda been a pretty nice dream trio in the Met Mile....Shack, Wilburn and Caleb's Posse
__________________
How do I work this?
-David Byrne

Last edited by PhantomOnTour; 11-10-2011 at 07:55 PM.
PhantomOnTour is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 08:07 PM   #4
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
he may have accomplished something if he had a chance to race more...


guess being a nice son of bernardini makes him too big to fail


__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 09:12 PM   #5
Spalding No!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,053
At least the stallion-hungry B. Wayne Hughes didn't gobble up Tapizar, too.

Why couldn't he have bought The Factor instead?
Spalding No! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 09:13 PM   #6
jelly
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 832
This will help bring more fans to racing.
jelly is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 09:25 PM   #7
thespaah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManU918
This really sucks. I have followed Wilburn from his first start and he was just starting to come around and they go and retire him. What a bunch of shit.
Problem with increasing numbers in yearling sales is we lose great horses to the breeding shed. It just does not make any sense for owners to risk their horses to the grind of racing when they can make a sure return on investment by turning racing stock into breeding stock.
It sucks sideways and it adds another kick in the balls to racing.
Thing is, if the best horses are not around to race beyond 3 or 4yrs of age, interest in the sport will continue to decline.
Now I am going to hear it from some of the owners on here. Have at it.
I'll save you the keystrokes. We agree to disagree.
thespaah is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 09:28 PM   #8
rastajenk
Just Deplorable
 
rastajenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,068
Wilburn? Isn't he that guy on TV with Kornhusker?

I'm afraid he never rose to the level of affecting attendance and handle.
rastajenk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2011, 09:47 PM   #9
toussaud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by thespaah
Problem with increasing numbers in yearling sales is we lose great horses to the breeding shed. It just does not make any sense for owners to risk their horses to the grind of racing when they can make a sure return on investment by turning racing stock into breeding stock.
It sucks sideways and it adds another kick in the balls to racing.
Thing is, if the best horses are not around to race beyond 3 or 4yrs of age, interest in the sport will continue to decline.
Now I am going to hear it from some of the owners on here. Have at it.
I'll save you the keystrokes. We agree to disagree.
I agree. It's kinda like a see saw. If you have great success at sales, more stallions are sapped up and the racing gets watered down. When sales are down, horses stay in training longer and racing is better, but at the same time, when sales are down, wagering is usually down so the whole time everyone is complaining about how bad everything is.


In both cases, the shed runs the show.
toussaud is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 07:29 AM   #10
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
Another one bites the dust.
Hard to call them "race" horses anymore.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 08:02 AM   #11
FenceBored
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by toussaud
I agree. It's kinda like a see saw. If you have great success at sales, more stallions are sapped up and the racing gets watered down. When sales are down, horses stay in training longer and racing is better, but at the same time, when sales are down, wagering is usually down so the whole time everyone is complaining about how bad everything is.


In both cases, the shed runs the show.
The market tanked in the Fall of 2008, so we should have seen the better racing these past three years. How did I miss the improvement amongst the males in the Handicap Division? Could someone point me to the replays?
FenceBored is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 08:18 AM   #12
sammy the sage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central fla.
Posts: 4,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
guess being a nice son of bernardini makes him too big to fail
that's it in a nutshell...they just doubled his daddy's stud fee to 150k...so here's clone/cheap shot wannabe trying to cash in on the coat-tails...
sammy the sage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 09:11 AM   #13
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy the sage
that's it in a nutshell...they just doubled his daddy's stud fee to 150k...so here's clone/cheap shot wannabe trying to cash in on the coat-tails...
right on Sammy


you know, objectively... Hughes and Spendthrift made a pretty sharp acquisition here.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 07:23 PM   #14
Doza
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomOnTour
Coulda been a pretty nice dream trio in the Met Mile....Shack, Wilburn and Caleb's Posse
Dream trio? Gotta dream a little bigger than that.
Doza is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2011, 08:28 PM   #15
dnlgfnk
Registered User
 
dnlgfnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis suburb
Posts: 1,761
Lamenting the departure of a three yr. old whose major accomplishment is the G-2 Indiana Derby is a statement in itself that, in order to maintain interest and attract new fans, the game needs to be seen as a gambling, rather than sporting venture.

In googling "Star studded field", one of the first racing entries was last year's Haskell Invitational, featuring such historical champions as Super Saver, Lookin At Lucky, Ice Box and First Dude.

I long for the days of 3 or 4 multiple stake winners to be matched up each weekend also, but the 1970's, and Jess Jackson have passed by. Maintaining enthusiasm for the game will have to come from the next exotic opportunity rather than the next rematch.
dnlgfnk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.