The face of White Supremacy

[PaceAdvantage]

PS. THE CUCKING KEEPS GETTING MORE AND MORE INTENSE

I personally think they should round up EVERY SINGLE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN in the USA and throw them into death camps:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...-BB1cMPwV?rt=0

This will solve the WHITE SUPREMACY CRISIS once and for all.

[chrisl]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

The drink of all white supremacists...what else would it be?

Wait for the attack on the makers of White Claw. They will want it banned as a racist beverage.

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

PS. THE CUCKING KEEPS GETTING MORE AND MORE INTENSE

I personally think they should round up EVERY SINGLE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN in the USA and throw them into death camps:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...-BB1cMPwV?rt=0

This will solve the WHITE SUPREMACY CRISIS once and for all.

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

[barahona44]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

Caroline Kennedy's husband is Jewish. Does that count?

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by barahona44

Caroline Kennedy's husband is Jewish. Does that count?

In the strictest sense, yea, it counts.

Gotta play fair.

[jocko699]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

As there is black supremacy and many of those are caucasian.

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

Maria Shriver married Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger.

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

Maria Shriver married Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger.

I would counter Arnold is acceptable. New blood. But acceptable.

[jimmyb]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

JFK and Teddy were infamous for their trysts. Some not from the upper crust.


Joe Sr. was notorious for frequently cheating on his wife, Rose, and it turns out, didn’t have much of a filter for suggestive comments, either – even when it came to his daughter Kick’s friends.

As a child, Kick’s friends were often uncomfortable around her father, who would touch or pinch them without their consent. At times, he’d even ask for a kiss at the end of the night, Byrne writes.

This discomfort came to head when Kick’s friend Charlotte McDonnell accidentally entered Joe’s suite at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York. Joe spoke to McDonnell, while he was standing in a towel, making jokes of a sexual nature, which she was appalled by.

[TJDave]

Up until the mid 60’s most everyone married within their tribe. I’m old enough to remember when interracial marriage was viscerally shocking. Jews and gentiles/Catholics and Protestants were an oddity as well.

Times have changed but I suspect that rich/poor will be the last to fade. Those with wealth and privilege are vain to give it up. The ultimate bigots. And the nouveau riche are worse.

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by jimmyb

JFK and Teddy were infamous for their trysts. Some not from the upper crust.


Joe Sr. was notorious for frequently cheating on his wife, Rose, and it turns out, didn’t have much of a filter for suggestive comments, either – even when it came to his daughter Kick’s friends.

As a child, Kick’s friends were often uncomfortable around her father, who would touch or pinch them without their consent. At times, he’d even ask for a kiss at the end of the night, Byrne writes.

This discomfort came to head when Kick’s friend Charlotte McDonnell accidentally entered Joe’s suite at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York. Joe spoke to McDonnell, while he was standing in a towel, making jokes of a sexual nature, which she was appalled by.

Come on. You have to have known what I meant by "relationship".

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by TJDave

Up until the mid 60’s most everyone married within their tribe. I’m old enough to remember when interracial marriage was viscerally shocking. Jews and gentiles/Catholics and Protestants were an oddity as well.

Times have changed but I suspect that rich/poor will be the last to fade. Those with wealth and privilege are vain to give it up. The ultimate bigots. And the nouveau riche are worse.

I see it exactly the same way. The first interracial marriage I was ever aware of as a kid was Oscar Robertson. I was maybe 8 years old and I remember asking my dad, "Isn't that illegal?"

Forgive me. I was a little kid and grew up in a neighborhood of Scandinavian fishermen. At the rec center I played in growing up, the only time there were any black kids there were when they bussed up from the Central District for rec center sponsored basketball games. There wasn't a black family living within 3 miles of my house in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle in the 70s.

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by TJDave

Up until the mid 60’s most everyone married within their tribe. I’m old enough to remember when interracial marriage was viscerally shocking. Jews and gentiles/Catholics and Protestants were an oddity as well.

Times have changed but I suspect that rich/poor will be the last to fade. Those with wealth and privilege are vain to give it up. The ultimate bigots. And the nouveau riche are worse.

More on subject, this touches very close to the facts of what we are dealing with at this time. There is really a battle to demarcate the elitists and the unwashed masses, and it's not based on racial standards. It's much more based on economic standards, and the white middle class is the target. There isn't a true effort to bring the black man up as there is to consolidate the bottom economic classes, to create a class, irrespective of race, of citizens reliant on government, and content being that way. The racial tensions are truly a cloak as to what the real efforts are. The left doesn't represent the underprivileged as much as they are consolidating they're base of control. Race is an easy diversion. It's simple for the masses to understand, and white guilt is proving to be an easy sale, much easier than "trust us at the top to look out for you" is to sell.

Edit: I read an article yesterday where anti-terrorism think tanks are comparing what happened in DC with the "Lost Cause" movements of the post civil war era in the south. However, and I could be wrong, but on Jan. 6, I didn't notice any posters or any mentions at all in the crowd, of "Save the White Race" or "Protect White Womenhood" or anything that could be construed as "racial". The media and left has equated "Love of America" with "White Supremacy". That's flat out ugly.

Ugly times we live in. The liars are winning the game.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by ultracapper

Edit: I read an article yesterday where anti-terrorism think tanks are comparing what happened in DC with the "Lost Cause" movements of the post civil war era in the south. However, and I could be wrong, but on Jan. 6, I didn't notice any posters or any mentions at all in the crowd, of "Save the White Race" or "Protect White Womenhood" or anything that could be construed as "racial". The media and left has equated "Love of America" with "White Supremacy". That's flat out ugly.

Ugly times we live in. The liars are winning the game.

Cue the photos of the confederate flag at the Jan 6 rally.

[ultracapper]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Cue the photos of the confederate flag at the Jan 6 rally.

Confederate Flag=White Supremacy?

Yep. Keep it simple. The media wins again.