|
|
05-03-2005, 06:13 PM
|
#2
|
Pace Cappa
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,649
|
That Bellamy Road fig looks huge , but does it have bounce written all over it ?
ZAFONIC
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2hFZ8KnsSo
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 08:42 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 730
|
Thanks for sharing them C.J. Class Act. Good luck in your wagers.
Skanoochies.
__________________
B.P.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 01:32 AM
|
#4
|
Bombardier
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,043
|
Thanks CJ
Your figures confirmed what I had suspected about Greeley's Galaxy. I think I found my key horse. Now if I can just figure out a way to get the whole screen on 1 page when I print them out... Any ideas?
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do. ~O.Gamble
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 01:57 AM
|
#5
|
Aspiring Pace Capper
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingfin66
Now if I can just figure out a way to get the whole screen on 1 page when I print them out... Any ideas?
|
As in the page is too wide when you print it? I know I use Firefox, it fits the screen onto the page. Makes the print a little smaller, but everything is on one page. Do you use IE or Firefox?
__________________
Marty: Eight's the one, I'd stake my life on it.
Jay Trotter: They've got a $2 minimum bet.
http://www.myspace.com/j_rod99
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 02:32 AM
|
#6
|
DJ M.Walk
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Compton, CA!
Posts: 2,073
|
I think cj's pace figure for Greeley's Galaxy is far to high.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 03:45 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 116
|
Set your printer preferences to landscape mode and you'll be okay, but wind up with more pages.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 04:07 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 116
|
In IE you need to change your view setting text size to smallest, then the print should fit in landscape mode.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 07:58 AM
|
#10
|
2 outta 3 aint bad
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lehigh Valley,PA.
Posts: 2,217
|
Track Variants
CJ- I don't know if you incorporate the DRF variants into your ratings or not.I've downloaded the DRF derby pps and see they have no variants for any prep race at GP and none for the San Felipe at SA.Any help on a fig(s) would be greatly appreciated -Thank You
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 08:19 AM
|
#11
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,842
|
I don't use the DRF variant at all. I can give you my variants, but they aren't on the same scale as those in the DRF, which I believe are 1 point = 1/5 second, regardless of distance.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 08:39 AM
|
#12
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,842
|
As for Greeley's Galaxy, I looked over the Hawthorne card again.
Here is what I see for the routes:
4 th, 1m 1/16, Raw Pace:74 , Raw Speed:75
7 th, 1m 1/ 8, Raw Pace:111, Raw Speed:108
10th, 1m 1/16, Raw Pace:64, Raw Speed:69
First, I calculate the final time variant. I project what I expect the winning speed figure to be based on the projection method. I figured around a 75 for the 4th, a 110 for the 7th (based on the 2nd and 3rd place finishers), and a 75 for the last. So I had projections of 0, 2 slow, and 6 slow. With the slow pace of the last race, I know that projection is probably a little off, so I settled on the 2 slow, the median.
Now for the pace variant, I compare the raw pace figures of the winners to the raw speed figures of the winner. So, I had 1 slow, 3 fast, and 5 slow, for an average of 1 slow, which means one slower than the final time variant. So, I have -3 pace (3 slow) and -2 speed (2 slow) variants.
I then subtract these from the raw figures to get 114, 110 for GG. I really think this day was pretty solid, no major questions for me. I think the difference is that I use the winner to calculate my pars and variants, not the leader. It is unusual for most, but I find it a much more consistent method. Had I used the leader for the 4th race, for example, the raw figures would have been 93 - 75, which would really skew the pace variant.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 10:05 AM
|
#13
|
Bombardier
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,043
|
Thanks for the figs and the print friendly version CJ. Thanks to others who responded as well.
As far as Greeley's figure goes, I look at it this way. At a big price, the figure is good...
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do. ~O.Gamble
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 10:08 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
|
I think the fig for GG is legit and I've been doing Hawthorne numbers for over 20 years. The only question regarding him is what did he beat (not much) and he had a perfect trip. When War Emblem won the Illinois Derby in 2002, he beat a pretty good horse in Repent, who at the time was considered one of the top Derby prospects.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 12:30 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 269
|
War Emblem won his Illinois Derby at Sportsman Park, so I wouldn't compare his numbers to the horses that have won that race since.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|