The Official Trump Collapsing Thread

[Tom]

Originally Posted by mrhorseplayer

if thats the "facts" Then why wasnt hillary raided for destroying evidence while under federal investigation?

Good point.
One that will obviously be ignored by the never-never-landers.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by Tom

Good point.
One that will obviously be ignored by the never-never-landers.

Weren't their computers all seized? Houma's and Weiner's?

Besides isn't this a double standard for anyone arguing a partisan trope?

[Tom]

Hillary erased and then wiped thousands of emails.
She physically destroyed devices.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by Tom

Hillary erased and then wiped thousands of emails.
She physically destroyed devices.

I thought a lot of stuff was seized though.

In any case if Hillary was guilty of that wouldn't Trump's lawyer buddy also be guilty in the court of Tom's opinion?

[Tom]

If he was shredding stuff that was part and parcel to an investigation, yes.
Laws don't change by party....only the enforcement of them.

Lots of stuff as seized and proved she broke he law. Intent has no part in what she did.

I have no problem with Cohen going, down or Trump either, for that matter, if he did, in fact, break the law. We know Hillary did, so why is she not indicted?

[mrhorseplayer]

Originally Posted by Tom

If he was shredding stuff that was part and parcel to an investigation, yes.
Laws don't change by party....only the enforcement of them.

Lots of stuff as seized and proved she broke he law. Intent has no part in what she did.

I have no problem with Cohen going, down or Trump either, for that matter, if he did, in fact, break the law. We know Hillary did, so why is she not indicted?

exactly

[tucker6]

Originally Posted by Tom

If he was shredding stuff that was part and parcel to an investigation, yes.
Laws don't change by party....only the enforcement of them.

Lots of stuff as seized and proved she broke he law. Intent has no part in what she did.

I have no problem with Cohen going, down or Trump either, for that matter, if he did, in fact, break the law. We know Hillary did, so why is she not indicted?

crickets

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by Tom

If he was shredding stuff that was part and parcel to an investigation, yes.
Laws don't change by party....only the enforcement of them.

Lots of stuff as seized and proved she broke he law. Intent has no part in what she did.

I have no problem with Cohen going, down or Trump either, for that matter, if he did, in fact, break the law. We know Hillary did, so why is she not indicted?

I don't know why or what for Hillary would have been indicted for. Honestly I don't. I didn't follow the whole thing that much because I didn't care.

I'm not sure what she is guilty of aside from being a shitty person.

Same goes for Trump.

What I'm positive of at tbis point is Cohen is going to be charged with legitimate stuff. If at some point Trump is as well that will be a big deal.

I'm just not as partisan as you guys on the issue. If there is smoke you should look for the fire. There was a lot of smoke surrounding Hillary and there is a lot of smoke surrounding the Trump Campaign/Administration.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by tucker6

crickets

What crickets?

I don't disagree with anything he said.

I see Trump supporters acting the exact same way Hillary supporters did.

Do you think Cohen has committed crimes and should be prosecuted?

[mrhorseplayer]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

I don't know why or what for Hillary would have been indicted for. Honestly I don't. I didn't follow the whole thing that much because I didn't care.

I'm not sure what she is guilty of aside from being a shitty person.

Same goes for Trump.

What I'm positive of at tbis point is Cohen is going to be charged with legitimate stuff. If at some point Trump is as well that will be a big deal.

I'm just not as partisan as you guys on the issue. If there is smoke you should look for the fire. There was a lot of smoke surrounding Hillary and there is a lot of smoke surrounding the Trump Campaign/Administration.

because hillary destroyed evidence while under a federal investigation this is not opinion this is fact.


Trump has not destroyed any evidence under federal investigation neither has his attorney.


with all the democratic hate if they had any thing at all on President Trump he would have already been charged.

[mrhorseplayer]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

What crickets?

I don't disagree with anything he said.

I see Trump supporters acting the exact same way Hillary supporters did.

Do you think Cohen has committed crimes and should be prosecuted?

HIllary committed the crimes by destroying evidence while under federal investigation this is not a opinion this is a fact.


cohen if he destroyed evidence while being under federal investigation then he needs to be charged.

[davew]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

Weren't their computers all seized? Houma's and Weiner's?

Besides isn't this a double standard for anyone arguing a partisan trope?

Hillary's friends were all given immunity and then Comey dropped the case.
Weiner's laptop checked for showing package to underage girls.

When checking Weiners laptop, the NYPD found Hillary/Huma pay to play (yoga and wedding stuff) emails...

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by davew

Hillary's friends were all given immunity and then Comey dropped the case.
Weiner's laptop checked for showing package to underage girls.

When checking Weiners laptop, the NYPD found Hillary/Huma pay to play (yoga and wedding stuff) emails...

Ahh okay.

Well lock her up I guess... honesty I didn't pay attention to it as my options were Trump or Hillary. I checked out.

Main issue I have is I don't see how any of that has anything to do with Trump's investigation. I would like to see illegal activities discovered and prosecuted... If found of course.

I still maintain I don't think Trump did anything illegal. I think a lot of people close to him have and will burn for it... including family... but I think he's just an egotistical idiot who says dumb things a lot. The more he or some of his council *cough* Giuliani *cough* talk the easier they make an obstruction case just with public statements.

Notice how quiet his actual White House counsel acts? They should take notes.

[mrhorseplayer]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

Ahh okay.

Well lock her upI guess... honesty I didn't pay attention to it as my options were Trump or Hillary. I checked out.

Main issue I have is I don't see how any of that has anything to do with Trump's investigation. I would like to see illegal activities discovered and prosecuted... If found of course.

I still maintain I don't think Trump did anything illegal. I think a lot of people close to him have and will burn for it... including family... but I think he's just an egotistical idiot who says dumb things a lot. The more he or some of his council *cough* Giuliani *cough* talk the easier they make an obstruction case just with public statements.

Notice how quiet his actual White House counsel acts? They should take notes.

is it the same people investigating President Trump that investigated Hillary? If so then those same peeps found wrong doing with hillary and asked not to prosecute then how can those same people want to prosecute President Trump if of course wrong doing if found also how can those same peeps be non biased in the investigation?


none of President Trumps family or anoyne close to President Trump did anything illegal cause if they did they would have been charged already. The is no obstuction.

[woodtoo]

Originally Posted by mrhorseplayer

is it the same people investigating President Trump that investigated Hillary? If so then those same peeps found wrong doing with hillary and asked not to prosecute then how can those same people want to prosecute President Trump if of course wrong doing if found also how can those same peeps be non biased in the investigation?


none of President Trumps family or anoyne close to President Trump did anything illegal cause if they did they would have been charged already. The is no obstuction.

The 17-month IG report comes out any day now, hopefully today.
Crooked Hillary will NOT be exonerated nor will her cadre be.