Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-23-2018, 02:26 AM   #5581
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
The orbits of planets according to Einstein, show where the planet was and will be. according to the curvature of space time.

The planet is not needed to be in all orbit positions and indeed no matter is needed in those positions to "see" that empty space is curved.
hcap is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 09:44 AM   #5582
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
The orbits of planets according to Einstein, show where the planet was and will be. according to the curvature of space time.

The planet is not needed to be in all orbit positions and indeed no matter is needed in those positions to "see" that empty space is curved.
And if no planets are needed, including the one Einstein was sitting on, what would he be able to us about empty space? Or time, for that matter?

FYI: We live in a physical universe. We cannot measure or make any predictions about things that do not touch any of our senses.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru

Last edited by boxcar; 02-23-2018 at 09:52 AM.
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 09:52 AM   #5583
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Yup! That's it. Everything you need to know about life, the universe and everything. The answer is, of course, 42.

Would that be your IQ level? Or how many cards you're missing in your deck? Or how many stories short your elevator is from reaching the top floor? Or all the above?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 09:57 AM   #5584
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Boxcar said Radiation is another form of matter but boxcar does not recognize it as matter. (E=MC^2). Various kinds of radiation of certain wavelengths can not be seen by the naked eye. If boxcar did accept electromagnetic phenomena of all sorts, would have to accept Einstein and he then might have to consider the curvature of space-time, and that a good portion of the universe is curved without the presence of local "matter"


And as I have posted a number of times "virtual particles", on the quantum level pop in and out of existence.

"Virtual particles are indeed real particles. Quantum theory predicts that every particle spends some time as a combination of other particles in all possible ways. These predictions are very well understood and tested"....Gordon Kane, director of the Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Michigan .


Evidence....



If boxcar did accept virtual particles he might have to consider the universe is still being created and annihilated way past the biblical 7 day timeline
Can there be any radiation without Matter?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:33 PM   #5585
Light
Veteran
 
Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Can there be any radiation without Matter?
You are to science what atheists are to God. Because you don't see it or know it, it doesn't exist.

In the spiritual realm, love and light are constantly being radiated. No matter exists there.
Light is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:48 PM   #5586
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Can there be any radiation without Matter?
Yes. At the moment of the Big Bang the universe was filled with radiation, i.e., photons, and there was no matter.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:54 PM   #5587
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
You are to science what atheists are to God. Because you don't see it or know it, it doesn't exist.

In the spiritual realm, love and light are constantly being radiated. No matter exists there.
Try to keep up, Lightness. You're comparing apples to oranges. We're weren't talking about the spiritual realm. We're talking about the Physical realm. And in this realm, there is no radiation apart from Matter.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 02:59 PM   #5588
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Yes. At the moment of the Big Bang the universe was filled with radiation, i.e., photons, and there was no matter.
That's speculation, that's number one.

Secondly, a photon is a particle. And a particle is a minute portion of Matter.

You truly are working hard to get into that Science Hall of Shame, aren't you?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 03:17 PM   #5589
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
That's speculation, that's number one.
No, it's not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Secondly, a photon is a particle. And a particle is a minute portion of Matter.
Particles are waves. And waves are particles. That's Quantum Physics.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 03:26 PM   #5590
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
No, it's not.

Particles are waves. And waves are particles. That's Quantum Physics.
And neither would exist apart from Matter.


Physics.

one of the extremely small constituents of matter, as an atom or nucleus.
an elementary particle, quark, or gluon.
a body in which the internal motion is negligible.


http://www.dictionary.com/browse/particle
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 03:28 PM   #5591
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
No, it's not.
Yeah, it is. Many scientists don't buy into it. And don't ask me to "prove" it. We've had this discussion previously. Goggle it if you don't believe me.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 03:34 PM   #5592
Light
Veteran
 
Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Try to keep up, Lightness. You're comparing apples to oranges. We're weren't talking about the spiritual realm. We're talking about the Physical realm. And in this realm, there is no radiation apart from Matter.
There is no difference between the physical and the spiritual realms. The realms are separated by energy disguised in one form or another. By a higher or lower "frequency". You cannot see higher frequencies. That's why God is invisible. Also only 5% of our universe is visible according to science. So I am not comparing apple to oranges. Remember Einstein's quote "energy cannot be created nor destroyed". In other words, energy is constant but changes form.
Light is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 03:58 PM   #5593
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Yeah, it is. Many scientists don't buy into it.
I'm a scientist and I'm not one of them.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 04:00 PM   #5594
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
And neither would exist apart from Matter.
Define matter.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 02-23-2018, 04:22 PM   #5595
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Define matter.
If that's of matter to you, define define.
Greyfox is offline  
Closed Thread





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.