|
|
03-14-2018, 02:20 PM
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless
Conor Lamb campaigned as a Veteran, said he was pro-gun, and promised to vote against Nancy Pelosi.
Rick Saccone is a Veteran and said the exact same things Lamb said about being pro-gun and voting against Pelosi.
The lone difference is Lamb is lying about both the gun issue and his no-Pelosi vote, imo.
Lamb simply ran a better Republican race than Saccone did.
That said, in all reality, by November of this year Lamb will become a footnote.
And even if Saccone wins today thanks to the uncounted votes, he's already a footnote.
|
Its over. Lamb has won. all the votes are counted and Lamb leads by 627 votes.
Recount if you want, it wont change the fact the this
Pro-union, Pro-choice, Pro-Obamacare Candidate ripped Trumps candidate a new one.
and Lamb will be running in the newly created 17th come November (and he will win). He is way too good of a candidate to lose.
Denial is a river in Eygpt.
Allan
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 02:28 PM
|
#62
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
I feel that's a fair assessment but...
- Trump did invest heavily in this race.
- Its steel country and Tariffs were enacted to protect that industry a week ago. Coincidental timing? Hardly.
- Trump made a campaign stop in favor of the GOP candidate over the weekend.
- Saccone wasn't a "bad" candidate and Lamb was a "good" one but that hardly explains the metrics that needed to be overcome.
- The district ALWAYS goes Republican.
The fact is the Republicans and the President put considerable resources into this campaign to lose another one. Imagine what this outcome might have been without the Tariff announcement and Pittsburgh visit.
|
The R's sunk 10,000,000 bucks into a district that will only exist for another 8 months.
Thats how desperate they were to hold the seat. desperate I tell you.
its like whipping a tired horse.
Allan
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 02:40 PM
|
#63
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: near Philadelphia
Posts: 4,560
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
Its over. Lamb has won. all the votes are counted and Lamb leads by 627 votes.
Recount if you want, it wont change the fact the this
Pro-union, Pro-choice, Pro-Obamacare Candidate ripped Trumps candidate a new one.
and Lamb will be running in the newly created 17th come November (and he will win). He is way too good of a candidate to lose.
Denial is a river in Eygpt.
Allan
|
I was making some points about the election.
I was most certainly not cheering for Saccone. As I said Lamb and Saccone said the exact same things.
Only the Democrats there bought Lamb's lies. He'll tote the party line about gun control every time it comes up. I am sure you'll remind us when he does too.
The race wasn't officially over when I made my post. That's why I made my qualifier about recounts. Since you didn't comprehend what I did write, I added 'even if' Saccone won, he's a footnote already. It was a knock. I guess it's tough for guys like you to understand.
Cavones could chortle all they want. It means nothing to me. I didn't give a shat either way.
Lamb, Saccone and Pennsylvania CD 18 are all footnotes already.
Last edited by reckless; 03-14-2018 at 02:42 PM.
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 03:51 PM
|
#64
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,473
|
What an exciting evening you guys had!
Sorry I missed it.
Say, listen, I'm thinking of painting a shelf in the basement today. You are all welcome to stop by and watch the paint dry if want to!
PM me for directions.
Man, so many here trying desperately to find a shred of their lost dignity in these things!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 08:52 PM
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
Pro-union, Pro-choice, Pro-Obamacare Candidate ripped Trumps candidate a new one.
|
No, the White House says that the Democrat won an upset victory because he embraced Trump's policies and rejected those of Nancy Pelosi.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...trump-policies
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
03-14-2018, 10:15 PM
|
#66
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,187
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Stinks
How blind or oblivious does one have to be to ask these questions. Of course people are sick of the tweets and lack of class your boy exhibits on a daily basis.
Your last line quoted above is priceless.
|
Except we're supposedly talking about people who VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT.
We're not talking about San Francisco or NYC.
Therein lies the difference, and my VALID, NOT BLIND, questions.
If you voted for DJT, you knew EXACTLY WHAT you were getting. We had the Access Hollywood tapes BEFORE the election. We had the NAME CALLING, the TWEETING, the "making fun of a disabled reporter," ETC ETC ETC all BEFORE they VOTED FOR THE MAN FOR PRESIDENT.
Don't give me this BS that people are all shocked and surprised about the man THEY VOTED FOR. If anyone is BLIND or OBLIVIOUS, it's people who voted for DJT and are now surprised or shocked at what they got.
That's why I'm completely fine with DJT. I voted for him...I knew what I would be getting.
Who are all these dumb-ass Trump voters who thought they were getting somebody else as President?
So again, try and follow along...instead of jumping in to attack me. Don't the left leaners around here frown on people who attack?
I'm feeling bullied...
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 03-14-2018 at 10:17 PM.
|
|
|
03-15-2018, 11:05 AM
|
#67
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,473
|
I voted for Trump and have no buyer's remorse at all.
From day one, I knew he was the one and Hillary was not.
Trump came down the big escalator.
Something Hillary could never do!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
03-15-2018, 11:37 AM
|
#68
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,469
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
Its over. Lamb has won. all the votes are counted and Lamb leads by 627 votes.
Recount if you want, it wont change the fact the this
Pro-union, Pro-choice, Pro-Obamacare Candidate ripped Trumps candidate a new one.
and Lamb will be running in the newly created 17th come November (and he will win). He is way too good of a candidate to lose.
Denial is a river in Eygpt.
Allan
|
The democrats have found the method to win again
run a white male on the Trump platform.
|
|
|
03-15-2018, 02:40 PM
|
#69
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,207
|
It will never happen, but I would love it if a Democrat ran on an anti-illegal immigration platform.
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 10:12 AM
|
#70
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 10:22 AM
|
#71
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,473
|
Libs and math do not go together.
Libs - do not try this at home.
Must be like racing, they had "about" 100% in.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 02:24 PM
|
#72
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
|
so riddle me this batman:
why did Trump call the winner "lamb the sham" nights before the election.
from a Pelosi supporter to a rejector of peolosi in one fell swoop.
Allan
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 02:35 PM
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
The democrats have found the method to win again
run a white male on the Trump platform.
|
well I disagree about Lamb running on Trump's platform
But the one undeniable fact.
is the dems are running superior candidates in house races.
Look who they are running NJ 11. they are running a naval pilot with impeccable credentials.
https://www.mikiesherrill.com/
Find a flaw with this candidate.
You cant and shes gonna win
Allan
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 02:36 PM
|
#74
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,469
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
so riddle me this batman:
why did Trump call the winner "lamb the sham" nights before the election.
from a Pelosi supporter to a rejector of peolosi in one fell swoop.
Allan
|
Because he thinks Lamb will block vote with the dims, regardless of what he said in the campaign. Time will tell.
|
|
|
03-16-2018, 02:53 PM
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggestal99
so riddle me this batman:
why did Trump call the winner "lamb the sham" nights before the election.
from a Pelosi supporter to a rejector of peolosi in one fell swoop.
Allan
|
He's covered either way. If the Pub wins, it's because Trump campaigned for him. If the Dem wins, it's because the Dem tricked people into believing he favored Trump policies.
In either case The Donald claims his policies won the election, transcending both candidates.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Rate This Thread |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|