James Clapper Recalls ‘Staggering’ Proof of Putin Swaying Election to Trump

[hcap]

Originally Posted by delayjf

All that intellect and all you can come up with is regurgitated socialist BS - I'm laughing at your "superior" intellect".

Doesn't take an Einstein to poke YUGE holes in all the Trumpeteer cultists whining.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

And thus concludes today's circle-jerk. Hcap was the first to use that on here in any meaningful way. And I clobbered him for it. Thought it was inappropriate and disgusting.

But now I embrace it....I embrace hcap's methods.

You two guys going back and forth just now was my evening's comedic entertainment. Thanks for that.

You were the one claiming Obama sold us out on that out of context absurd video you post (many times) when you feel threatened.

Simply because two of us called you on the accuracy and relevancy of it, does not mean we were "ganging up" on you like how we get personally insulted over and over again by all the cultists on this board.

Another one of your false equivalencies.

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

Doesn't take an Einstein to poke YUGE holes in all the Trumpeteer cultists whining.

What is Clappers' 'staggering' proof ? I seemed to have missed it.

[letswastemoney]

Trump rallies are peaceful for the most part. It's when someone hostile such as Acosta shows up that people are angry, but there's almost never violence.

Trump supporters use words. They aren't ANTIFA.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

What is Clappers' 'staggering' proof ? I seemed to have missed it.

Read the beginning of this thread. He, and I never said there was proof as of yet. But he was DNY and has been in national security for many years. When someone with solid credentials speaks, it makes sense to listen.

Whereas if the Chump-in-Chief babbles the opposite what his own intel people say, it does not

Clapper has held several key positions within the United States Intelligence Community. He served as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) from 1992 until 1995. He was the first director of defense intelligence within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and simultaneously the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.[3] He served as the director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) from September 2001 until June 2006.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by letswastemoney

Trump rallies are peaceful for the most part. It's when someone hostile such as Acosta shows up that people are angry, but there's almost never violence.

Trump supporters use words. They aren't ANTIFA.

There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE Acosta was in any way hostile.

I find it difficult to believe "peaceful Trump supporters" are peaceful chanting mindlessly the press is the enemy of the people and harmonizing this in tune with Trump's whims. He acts like a band leader playing the crowd as a high strung instrument.

[woodtoo]

Still off your meds I see.

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

Read the beginning of this thread. He, and I never said there was proof as of yet. But he was DNY and has been in national security for many years. When someone with solid credentials speaks, it makes sense to listen.

Whereas if the Chump-in-Chief babbles the opposite what his own intel people say, it does not

Clapper has held several key positions within the United States Intelligence Community. He served as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) from 1992 until 1995. He was the first director of defense intelligence within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and simultaneously the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.[3] He served as the director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) from September 2001 until June 2006.

So like the rest of the dims, nothing there there, but could be 'staggering' proof once it is found?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by hcap

You were the one claiming Obama sold us out on that out of context absurd video you post (many times) when you feel threatened.

Simply because two of us called you on the accuracy and relevancy of it, does not mean we were "ganging up" on you like how we get personally insulted over and over again by all the cultists on this board.

Another one of your false equivalencies.

Even ely would agree that if that were Trump and Medvedev in that video, under the EXACT same circumstances, in no WAY would you be trying to sugarcoat what was said in that video.

You and the rest of the Democrats in Congress would be calling for his immediate impeachment.

So spare me your BS.

That video is HIGHLY APPROPRIATE given today's constant Russia news cycle. (Well, it's been interrupted by "Q," which is the new MSM obsession, for some reason).

NO Republicans were calling for Obama's impeachment after that video. Nobody was screaming "RUSSIAN COLLUSION." Nobody was hiring special counsels to investigate.

Duplicity at its finest, despite a whopper of actual, verifiable, video evidence.

Oh...oh!...oh!...but Trump said Putin said he didn't do it...IMPEACH HIM that TRAITOR!!! L M F A O

[Tom]

Originally Posted by davew

What is Clappers' 'staggering' proof ? I seemed to have missed it.

I think what happened was that Clappers was staggering out of a bar when he said that.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Even ely would agree that if that were Trump and Medvedev in that video, under the EXACT same circumstances, in no WAY would you be trying to sugarcoat what was said in that video.

You and the rest of the Democrats in Congress would be calling for his immediate impeachment.

So spare me your BS.

That video is HIGHLY APPROPRIATE given today's constant Russia news cycle. (Well, it's been interrupted by "Q," which is the new MSM obsession, for some reason).

NO Republicans were calling for Obama's impeachment after that video. Nobody was screaming "RUSSIAN COLLUSION." Nobody was hiring special counsels to investigate.

Duplicity at its finest, despite a whopper of actual, verifiable, video evidence.

Oh...oh!...oh!...but Trump said Putin said he didn't do it...IMPEACH HIM that TRAITOR!!! L M F A O

I agree that lefties would be skewering Trump for making those same comments. I would argue with them about that...

Doesn't change the fact the track record of the previous administration vs. this one's first 18 months is shockingly different.

[lefty359]

How can the press not be the enemy of the people when they call Trump deranged, Stalin, Hitler and any vile name they can think of and now they have started on the people that voted for Trump. They ignore his successes and insult him personally. Yes, they are not objective but an active wing of the Democrats. Trump is right again.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Even ely would agree that if that were Trump and Medvedev in that video, under the EXACT same circumstances, in no WAY would you be trying to sugarcoat what was said in that video.

A lot of ifs.
Obama was engaged and aligned with NATO, arguing together with the Russians about an ant-ballistic treaty. There was no 2+ hours hidden from U.S. advisors, security personal or the public.

Obama tells Russia's Medvedev more flexibility after election
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-n...82P0JI20120326

The United States and NATO had offered Russia a role in the project to create an anti-ballistic shield which includes participation by Romania, Poland, Turkey and Spain.

You and the rest of the Democrats in Congress would be calling for his immediate impeachment.

So spare me your BS.

-Obama, during talks in Seoul, urged Moscow to give him “space” (on an open mic)until after the November ballot, and Medieval said he would relay the message to incoming Russian president Vladimir Putin.

So if your Chump-in-Chief had been already in talks out in the open with NATO and Medieval and not dissing NATO and the EU just before meeting, Chump might be given a pass. Yeah, we would be pissed he got caught on an open mic, but if everything else was diplomatically OPEN and we perceived Chumpy as honestly representing the interests of the U.S., no one would be calling the Chump a TRAITOR.

That video is HIGHLY APPROPRIATE given today's constant Russia news cycle. (Well, it's been interrupted by "Q," which is the new MSM obsession, for some reason).

NO Republicans were calling for Obama's impeachment after that video. Nobody was screaming "RUSSIAN COLLUSION." Nobody was hiring special counsels to investigate.

Bull.Total nonsense.
It was the second time the conference was held after the 1st 2010 Nuclear Security Summit. All out in the open.

The summit series discusses international cooperative measures to protect nuclear materials and facilities from terrorist groups
There was absolutely no conspiracy going on. Except in your fevedrish false equivalency feeble understanding of history, inappropriately derived from a 10 second clip from a video, used as a definite Obama hit piece

[FantasticDan]

Twitter

[woodtoo]

Originally Posted by FantasticDan

https://twitter.com/noahpinion/statu...50926271143936

Now you get it!!!