|
07-08-2021, 10:06 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
|
'Out of business': Why is racing losing so many trainers?
https://www.horseracingnation.com/ne...y_trainers_123
Excerpt:
Other countries, particularly Japan, have horse limits in place that distribute horses more evenly among trainers. But those nations are subject to more stringent government regulations. In the U.S., any change would have to come from within the industry – and across a patchwork of state racing authorities that must be open to common reform.
“I think it’s going to have to be on the racetracks to slow down the mega-stables,” Bradley said. “If you’re the kind of person who wants that many horses, then good for you. I’m not saying anything bad about the mega-stables, but that’s what hurts us. I think, until then, things are going to keep going south.”
|
|
|
07-08-2021, 11:46 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 510
|
I dont think we can save the sport without new owners and we will not get many new owners if they have less than a 10% CHANCE to make a profit. Sport of Kings and there doesn't seem to be enough of those so I guess they will have to increase the take out.
|
|
|
07-08-2021, 12:41 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 518
|
Go sit at an auction and spend $40k+ on a horse, let it hang out until the end of its 2 year old year, only be able to run in a few states where you might be able to turn a profit or even break even, and try to rationalize not giving it to a recognizable trainer. You simply can’t. You’re pushing almost 6 figures to take a 2 year old from auction to the starting gate that can do anything other than run in claiming races on a C rate circuit, you’re not going fishing for an unproven trainer at those costs
|
|
|
07-08-2021, 03:38 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Turf_Monster
Go sit at an auction and spend $40k+ on a horse, let it hang out until the end of its 2 year old year, only be able to run in a few states where you might be able to turn a profit or even break even, and try to rationalize not giving it to a recognizable trainer. You simply can’t. You’re pushing almost 6 figures to take a 2 year old from auction to the starting gate that can do anything other than run in claiming races on a C rate circuit, you’re not going fishing for an unproven trainer at those costs
|
The economics of the sport are terrible on a lot of levels.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 11:57 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,666
|
Horsemen just aren't willing to lose. They want walk-overs and network behind the scenes with other outfits to keep live runners from colliding. Jock's agents act as liasons and air-traffic controllers in this pursuit. Nobody invested wants two dominant str/alw, for instance, runners to actually slug it out. Not when it's easily arranged to take turns with each beating short, overmatched fields by a pole-at 2/5 odds.
And if two monsters DO hit the overnite in the same race, one of them is likely to get scratched.
Perhaps even more insidiously, barns now vet pace-scenarios and won't show up if the flow looks unfavorable.
And this consiracy to create non-competitive events applies not only to stakes or alw races. I've seen insiders go to UNBELIEVEABLE lengths to arrange virtual walk-overs in cheap condition races. And this ever-increasing insistence on requiring perfect situations for sharp horses has resulted in an epidemic of scratches that is, or soon will be, THE biggest problem facing thoroughbred racing
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 12:02 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,632
|
Don't some owners get into the business knowing they will lose money?
The horse ownership expenses offset some other business profits they make.
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 02:04 PM
|
#7
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
Don't some owners get into the business knowing they will lose money?
The horse ownership expenses offset some other business profits they make.
|
I could be mistaken, but I thought those incentives were taken away many years ago.
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 02:35 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 245
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman
Horsemen just aren't willing to lose. They want walk-overs and network behind the scenes with other outfits to keep live runners from colliding. Jock's agents act as liasons and air-traffic controllers in this pursuit. Nobody invested wants two dominant str/alw, for instance, runners to actually slug it out. Not when it's easily arranged to take turns with each beating short, overmatched fields by a pole-at 2/5 odds.
And if two monsters DO hit the overnite in the same race, one of them is likely to get scratched.
Perhaps even more insidiously, barns now vet pace-scenarios and won't show up if the flow looks unfavorable.
And this consiracy to create non-competitive events applies not only to stakes or alw races. I've seen insiders go to UNBELIEVEABLE lengths to arrange virtual walk-overs in cheap condition races. And this ever-increasing insistence on requiring perfect situations for sharp horses has resulted in an epidemic of scratches that is, or soon will be, THE biggest problem facing thoroughbred racing
|
And tracks don't care because they don't care about racing anymore, just as long as they do enough to justify their casino license.
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 02:40 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I could be mistaken, but I thought those incentives were taken away many years ago.
|
In California the write offs from Horse racing were under scrutiny back in the 80's.
IRS looks at it as more of a Hobby and not a Business. Hard to keep out of the audit file.
|
|
|
07-11-2021, 03:54 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
|
Just out of curiosity what is considered a large stable? 10 horses, 30 horses, 50, etc?
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 06:30 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Benton, La.
Posts: 1,841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by airford1
I dont think we can save the sport without new owners and we will not get many new owners if they have less than a 10% CHANCE to make a profit. Sport of Kings and there doesn't seem to be enough of those so I guess they will have to increase the take out.
|
I think less than 10% is a little high
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 06:37 PM
|
#12
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,288
|
In Canada we used to have dozens and dozens of partnership of "gentleman" farmers who would rather lose a bit having fun versus just giving that money to the government.
Loop holes began to close in the 80's (tax write offs) and along with ih the extinction of the friendly gentleman partnerships
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|