Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-23-2020, 05:21 PM   #16
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
Sort of laughing at this. The execs think that the regulation "will be perceived in a positive light by the general public". But the same execs have done very little about the perceived "drugging of horses" by the same public. A issue that has plagued the industry for much longer.
jay68802 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-28-2020, 10:15 PM   #17
Afleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,190
but trainers winning @50% were allowed for years
Afleet is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-29-2020, 06:59 AM   #18
rastajenk
Just Deplorable
 
rastajenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by alhattab View Post
From the link, Joe Bravo:
Quote:
“I am shocked by this,” he said. “This rule takes away all the competition that makes up a horse race. The competitiveness of the race will be the biggest change. How do you get horses that are next to one another to go on and fight and have a race down the lane? There will be no competition. Horses are pack animals. They follow one another. How will you get them to pass one another? From a competitive standpoint, these races will be really dull.”
Antonio Gallardo:
Quote:
“Who’s going to want to bet on Monmouth Park? Nobody will bet on it,” he said. “One hundred percent, nobody will bet on Monmouth with no whips. If nobody bets there will be no money. No money, no racing. Game over.”
rastajenk, post #3:
Quote:
The New Jersey part of my handle just went from zero to -zero.
rastajenk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-30-2020, 11:27 PM   #19
Al Gobbi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 997
Quote:
A group of jockeys gathered in the paddock garden at Santa Anita on Sunday morning, awaiting their mounts for the next session of workouts. A single subject dominated conversation – new whip rules that take effect this week at California tracks.

The centuries-old style of striking a horse with a full-arm motion was banned earlier this year by the California Horse Racing Board, replaced by rules dictating an underhanded motion and a limit of six strikes in a race.

The riders gathered at Santa Anita on Sunday morning expressed a mix of concern and trepidation over how they will adjust to the new methods and how strict track stewards will be regarding financial penalties and suspensions for violations.
https://www.drf.com/news/california-...es-willing-try
Al Gobbi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.