Using the FREE program

[douglasw32]

Get the Newest Program here.

http://localpcpros.com/FASTV7.exe

Here we can discuss HOW everyone is using the program =) as requested.

I have to stop changing it now or my wife will divorce me since it is the only thing she uses, she loves all the improvements we have all contributed but is tired of seeing something new each time.

So lets consider it done.

As always...

A word about printing, it works great in firefox, (http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/produc...=win&lang=en-US) if you print preview and choose "Shrink To Fit"

Thanks again to all of you =)

Doug


P.S.

If it does not work try adding these to your system....

(dot) net
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...&displaylang=en

VB runtimes
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/192461

Library files
http://www.ascentive.com/support/new/libraryfiles.exe

BTW- hint, when you print like I do to the free Bullzip PDF printer from the internet browser, since the report is in HTML
http://www.bullzip.com/products/pdf/info.php#download

Be sure to go to...

Tools->Internet Options->Advanced, scroll to PRINTING
checkbox, "Print background Images and Colors"

Even if you are printing to a "real" printer.

Also this is a great PDF tool for "Marking Up the PDF"
http://www.docu-track.com/downloads/users/
Get the free pdfXchange viewer.

This was all tested when opened in Internet Explorer 8 set as the default browser on 32 bit Vista.

I have been told it works fine on XP, Vista 64 bit and even Linux through wine.

The Pace Advantage Toolbar I made some time ago that needs some updating is here (no spyware)
http://handicappers.ourtoolbar.com/

and an app I made for my IPOD TOUCH/IPHONE is here...
http://localpcpros.com/handicappers.xml
Just open this link with the ipod and save it to the main screen.

This is ALL FREE.

[douglasw32]

This is how "I" see the 8th at Belmont 6/17/09
http://localpcpros.com/bel.pdf

What does everyone else come up with?

[fight]

hey friend i just drew down new program you sent 8th at bel i look at my sat #s tyey are not the same i use bris 1$ whys that my fast #s are top to bottom 85-92-85-78-84-77-77-80-85 isee its 1point here and there but shouldnt we be the same? if you are using bris1$ ty friend good work its appreciated by all.

[fight]

using dartmans theory witch i like and by the way thats not throwing a dart at the sheet lol i get 2-9-3-1tie-8tie.again thanks doug.

[douglasw32]

Originally Posted by fight

hey friend i just drew down new program you sent 8th at bel i look at my sat #s tyey are not the same i use bris 1$ whys that my fast #s are top to bottom 85-92-85-78-84-77-77-80-85 isee its 1point here and there but shouldnt we be the same? if you are using bris1$ ty friend good work its appreciated by all.

Sorry there was a programming error (I mentioned on the last thread that I noticed trying to explain what made up the fast fig) so any of the older ones will come out with different numbers.

more accurate and most likely "tighter" on a scale.

=(

[fight]

just so you understand me.you may have misunderstood what i said i have you new program installed so would i not get the same fast#s as you ??because they are differentthan your bel 8th example . what dont i get?

[Pcon04]

Douglas

Did you eliminated the days away LR in the summary on purpose ???

thanks
pcon04

[dartman51]

Originally Posted by douglasw32

This is how "I" see the 8th at Belmont 6/17/09
http://localpcpros.com/bel.pdf

What does everyone else come up with?

I'm going with the 3. In 84 races @ 6f, at this meet, 42% have gone wire to wire, and the preferred R/S is E. So with that knowledge, and the program numbers, I will go with the 3 to WIN, and the 3 over/under the 1,4,8.

[dartman51]

Originally Posted by fight

using dartmans theory witch i like and by the way thats not throwing a dart at the sheet lol i get 2-9-3-1tie-8tie.again thanks doug.

Fight
While the 2 does have a 6 point edge in the FaST #'s, He is 7 points behind on the dirt #'s (using TSN files). That's when I have to either dig deeper or pass the race. I could also make a case for Doug's choice. If he is 8-1 or better at PT. Within his last few starts, he has matched or exceeded PAR for final time @ today's distance and class level.The only horse in the race that has done so. He also is 2 of 4 at this track, and 4 of 10 at this distance. Plus, has the best TOTAL pace rating. ALL of this is what makes this game so complicated.
See my other post for what I will probably play. If the #1 is 8-1 or better @ PT, it could alter my bet.

Good Luck.

[douglasw32]

Originally Posted by fight

just so you understand me.you may have misunderstood what i said i have you new program installed so would i not get the same fast#s as you ??because they are differentthan your bel 8th example . what dont i get?

I used the BRIS single file DRF in the Version 7 of the program for todays 8th.

if you are doing exactly that and getting different numbers then that is very odd?

[douglasw32]

Originally Posted by Pcon04

Douglas

Did you eliminated the days away LR in the summary on purpose ???

thanks
pcon04

Sorry yes, for space i can add them back if so desired ?

[fight]

85-92-85-78-84-77-77-80-85 yes i using that filewhy different #s?
86-93-86-78-85-78-77-81-85 are yours strange

[Pcon04]

douglas

for me the ML would be beneficial.I for one do not like long layoff

horses .Especially if its a Fav.


Thanks

P

[headhawg]

Originally Posted by fight

85-92-85-78-84-77-77-80-85 yes i using that filewhy different #s?
86-93-86-78-85-78-77-81-85 are yours strange

Looks like a rounding issue to me. Could be that different CPUs yield slightly different results?? Or maybe the O/S?

[douglasw32]

Quote:
Originally Posted by fight
85-92-85-78-84-77-77-80-85 yes i using that filewhy different #s?
86-93-86-78-85-78-77-81-85 are yours strange

Looks like a rounding issue to me. Could be that different CPUs yield slightly different results?? Or maybe the O/S?


================================================== ====

Maybe,I suppose it could round differently.

Fight, did you try downloading it over again to the same place as the older one and executing it, that should overwrite the old one, just top be sure ???