Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Advance Deposit Wagering (ADW)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-20-2007, 04:26 PM   #46
NoCal Boy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 633
It gets complicated, but I do believe the law is unconstitutional as applied to interstate parimutuel wagering. I doubt it means much lost handle as AZ likely has few larger players, but it simply is not right.
NoCal Boy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 04:27 PM   #47
HorseRun
Journeyman
 
HorseRun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
with YOUBET the time being, means forever...i got the same letter in NJ about 5 years ago and youbet still doesnt allow NJ members....these guys are worthless and overpaid
HorseRun is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 04:46 PM   #48
highnote
Registered User
 
highnote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
I called the 800 number for the AZ AG and it was not a valid number.

Can you check the number and repost it?
highnote is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 05:16 PM   #49
theiman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 355
I copied and pasted it from another forum.

Sorry.
theiman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 05:27 PM   #50
speedking
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 593
AZ Attorney General Terry Goddard

602-542- 5025

800-352-8431 is for AZ calls only it seems.
speedking is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 05:29 PM   #51
betovernetcapper
Registered User
 
betovernetcapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 2,145
There are 2 basic types of 800 #s-intrastate and interstate. State officials have to talk to the residents so they may pay for an intrastate 800#. Given that most people calling a state official from out of state are complaining about something they'd rather not pay for the call. My guess is it's an intrastate 800#.
__________________
The fan base demographics are not particularly positive," he said. "I guess we can either risk alienating them or letting them die off. " -Bob Evans 6/25/2007

My posts & letters & avatars & whatever reflect solely my own world view- Born in 1948 and never an I.C.E. visit
betovernetcapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 09:57 PM   #52
azbacks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Phoenix
Posts: 10
I did a little digging and was not suprised to find that information was slim. This House Resolution went through with the minimum amount of public exposure. It was endorsed by Turf Paradise, but opposed by the AZ Dept of Racing. I understand the vote was near to unaminous. Only 9 against.

The law allows state residents to wager only at the state approved locations. Horse and dog tracks and their associated OTB's. This HR only applies to pari-mutual wagering. It is a class 6 felony. Several years ago this same type resolution, with misdemeanor penalties, did not make it to the GOV..

This information is available to the public, but I am sure Boomer knows more than what is in the legal records.

I also felt this is a little hypocritical to accept out of state wagering, but not allow locals to wager on tracks other than what they are offering at the OTB..

azbacks

I feel the above info is correct, but don't go suing anyone over it!!
azbacks is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2007, 11:42 PM   #53
NateBracey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
Mind Boggling

I live in Scottsdale and had my Brisbet account
closed as of last night. The ABSOLUTE way to
get this overturned would be for Brisbet, Youbet, etc...
to stop taking wagers in Turf Paradise. All of this
dump of a track's income comes from off track monies.
You cut that out and I guarantee something will change.

So here is what I heard "somebody" do. They had a relative open an account for them out of Arizona - a relative that is trustworthy enough to send them their checks when they make a withdrawl.
NateBracey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 12:01 AM   #54
Indulto
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by NateBracey
I live in Scottsdale and had my Brisbet account
closed as of last night. The ABSOLUTE way to
get this overturned would be for Brisbet, Youbet, etc...
to stop taking wagers in Turf Paradise. All of this
dump of a track's income comes from off track monies.
You cut that out and I guarantee something will change.

So here is what I heard "somebody" do. They had a relative open an account for them out of Arizona - a relative that is trustworthy enough to send them their checks when they make a withdrawl.
Wouldn't the relative have to submit the wagers as well? Don't some ADW/Totes look at URLs as well?
Indulto is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 12:18 AM   #55
TomC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 105
Has anyone ever seen another industry that seems to despise its clients as much as the horse racing industry?

What sizes would the purses be if we all stopped wagering? Maybe we can all go to the track just to cheer the nice horsey on, and have a hot dog. Forget the wagering. Extra mustard please....oh and dont forget to tax me on it.
TomC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 12:21 AM   #56
NateBracey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 25
hmmmmm...

you could be right...don't have an answer for that one!
NateBracey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 12:50 AM   #57
Kelso
Veteran
 
Kelso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC
Has anyone ever seen another industry that seems to despise its clients as much as the horse racing industry?

What sizes would the purses be if we all stopped wagering?
I think Arizona is a prime target to provide an answer. Relatively small and, therefor, weak. Absolutely inconsquential to the industry. Ignore 'em until they cave ... then identify the next weak target.

BOYCOTT AZ TRACKS!
Kelso is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 12:59 AM   #58
Hosshead
It's A Photo-Ying & Yang
 
Hosshead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by NateBracey
The ABSOLUTE way to
get this overturned would be for Brisbet, Youbet, etc...
to stop taking wagers on Turf Paradise.
That's exactly what ALL the ADW's should do. There's only one thing stopping them.
Greed.
Do you think that little Aruba might have a chance to solve this problem ?
Hosshead is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 01:04 AM   #59
prospector
Registered User
 
prospector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bullhead city, az
Posts: 1,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by boomman
Obviously (working at Yavapai Downs since their inception) I am TOTALLY aware of what is going on ADW wise in Arizona, and would be happy to answer any questions CONFIDENTIALLY via pm.........

Boomer
boomer,
did you know this was coming and still let us procott Yavapai Downs ?
i sure hope not...i always like to think the best of people..
__________________
"Marines - Providing Enemies of America an Opportunity To Die For their
Country Since 1775"
prospector is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2007, 01:14 AM   #60
TomC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 105
My thinking is this.
1) Make a deal where YOUBET, BRISBET, etc, MUST carry TUP.
2) They must accept wagers for TUP from AZ residents (as well as all states)
3) Any wager they accept from AZ, the ADW gets NO commission. 100% of the "take" goes to TUP, as if we placed the bet at TUP.

What would this do? Make everyone a winner....
1) The fans win, obviously.
2) TUP gets a new income stream doing nothing on their part.
3) THE ADW does not lose on TUP, because before all this, AZ residents were not allowed to bet on TUP anyway. However, they (ADW) do get to keep their customers.
4) The state wins, collecting extra taxes from the increased TUP handle

Oh wait a second....everyone would be happy and it would make good sense. Forget I said this. They would never go for it. Maybe instead they can look into charging us with a Class 6 Felony if our shoe laces are untied.

Can you imagine this. You fill out a mortgage application. You get to the part where it asks "Have you ever been convicted of a felony?" You answer Yes...$20 to win on the 7.
TomC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.