You need to watch this video...

[PaceAdvantage]

...especially if you're Jewish

Being woke apparently means you can call for the genocide of Jews without punishment on our most "elite" campuses today. Fabulous.

And they call DONALD TRUMP an "existential threat" to the USA...wow

When IN FACT, this is EXACTLY WHAT THE DEMOCRATS WARNED US ABOUT...that anti-Semitism is "skyrocketing" because Trump was president...but the REAL TRUTH is that the DEMOCRATS and the FAR-LEFT (like these university administrators) are the TRUE ENABLERS of the WORST KIND of anti-Semitism.

DEAD COUNTRY

YouTube

Definitely VOTE FOR MORE OF THIS by voting for Biden in 2024.

[PaceAdvantage]

PS. none of the people answering questions in that video have ever, or will ever, vote for Trump, or any Republican for that matter

Trump isn't the problem

Democrats and the far-left are the true existential threat.

[PaceAdvantage]

Imagine trying to SIDESTEP such obvious answers to obvious questions like the women in that video did.

Imagine if Stefanik was asking about hateful statements made on college campuses about trans people...or gay people...or Black people...do you think they would sit there squirming in their seats trying to formulate some sort of response like that?

No. Their answer would have been immediate and forceful. None of that would be tolerated and it would absolutely amount to bullying and harassment and would most certainly violate their code of conduct for students. And students caught doing such things would face swift and immediate punishment including expulsion.

But when it comes to the Jews?

[zico20]

Here is what Stefanik should have said when they wouldn't affirm calling for genocide against Jews goes against their code of conduct. She then should have asked "if a white student calls for N****** to be shipped back to Africa, would that violate your code of conduct." We all know what the answer would be, exposing their hypocrisy and hatred of whites and Jews.

This entire hatred is more about whites vs non whites than with Jews, although that plays a major part with those who are Muslim. If it were non whites bombing whites you would never hear a call for a cease fire from the left or minorities, you can bet your life on that.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

...especially if you're Jewish

Being woke apparently means you can call for the genocide of Jews without punishment on our most "elite" campuses today. Fabulous.

And they call DONALD TRUMP an "existential threat" to the USA...wow

When IN FACT, this is EXACTLY WHAT THE DEMOCRATS WARNED US ABOUT...that anti-Semitism is "skyrocketing" because Trump was president...but the REAL TRUTH is that the DEMOCRATS and the FAR-LEFT (like these university administrators) are the TRUE ENABLERS of the WORST KIND of anti-Semitism.

DEAD COUNTRY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqWUD6qRJxQ

Definitely VOTE FOR MORE OF THIS by voting for Biden in 2024.

Elise Stefanic, just another MAGA bully, who doesn’t understand the difference between speech and actions. Unless speech leads directly to harmful actions, it is protected. No matter how repugnant it is. Stefanic’s part of the hearing was five minutes of a 3 3/4 hour hearing.

There were actually many valuable moments. All provided by Democrats and the responses to their question. We learned efforts to protect Jewish students is being hamstrung by Republican efforts to cut funding to civil rights office. We learned specific strategies Universities were implementing to protect students while protecting constitutional rights.


We learned that some Republicans Representatives are dumber than a box of rocks. Including one who thought it would be a good idea for Universities to keep track of what percentage of their faculty were conservatives.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Elise Stefanic, just another MAGA bully, who doesn’t understand the difference between speech and actions. Unless speech leads directly to harmful actions, it is protected. No matter how repugnant it is. Stefanic’s part of the hearing was five minutes of a 3 3/4 hour hearing.

You can't be serious.

Yes, under the Constitution of the United States, that is true - only when it comes to what the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT can and can't do. But you don't care about the Constitution as evidenced by the various despicable trampings of said document the last 8+ years or so by the party you support with every fiber of your being.

Thus, as you well know, speech does not have to lead to harmful actions IN THIS INSTANCE.

The women answering those questions don't work for the US Gov't, therefore they are not bound by the free speech clause. You know this because you constantly told me this when the social media companies were censoring their asses off during COVID and beyond (even though they were being PRESSURED to do so by the DEMOCRATS and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which is definitely UNCONSTITUTIONAL BEHAVIOR by said Democrats).

These women operate under the rules set forth by the universities who cut their paychecks. They do not operate under the rules set forth in the US Constitution for the US Federal Government.

Stop acting as dumb as you are.

Those universities would NEVER allow white people to walk around campus calling for the death of Black people. They would NEVER allow hateful groups of students to walk around calling for the death of gay or trans people. Those students would likely be EXPELLED immediately.

But call for the death of Jews?

No problem for those women in the hearing, and also no problem for mostpost.

Feel free to carry on students...as long as you don't actually try to kill anyone.

And they (including mostpost) used to tell us TRUMP was "enabling anti-Semitism" in this country while he was president.

Get fucked.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Elise Stefanic, just another MAGA bully, who doesn’t understand the difference between speech and actions. Unless speech leads directly to harmful actions, it is protected. No matter how repugnant it is. Stefanic’s part of the hearing was five minutes of a 3 3/4 hour hearing.

There were actually many valuable moments. All provided by Democrats and the responses to their question. We learned efforts to protect Jewish students is being hamstrung by Republican efforts to cut funding to civil rights office. We learned specific strategies Universities were implementing to protect students while protecting constitutional rights.


We learned that some Republicans Representatives are dumber than a box of rocks. Including one who thought it would be a good idea for Universities to keep track of what percentage of their faculty were conservatives.

You mental midget.
Explaion to me, then, how your dcumbag democrats are labeling PARENTS PRTECTING THEIR CHILDREN FROM THE PERVERTED (ALL) DEMOCRATS CALLING THEM DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.

You liberal pigs are nothing short of pedophiles and child abusers.
What we need is hunting licences for you lying preditors. btw. you just labeled yourself a full member of the nazi party....oh, wait, YOU ALREADY WERE!

DEMOCRATS- DRIVE THEM INTO THE SEAS. THEY ARE TERROROISTS.
YOU BELONG ON A LIST.

[classhandicapper]

These fucking scumbags would throw me out of their ivy league schools if a 6' 5" bearded guy had his 8" dick and balls hanging out of his pink bikini and I referred to him as "he" when his desired pronoun is "she" but they won't even admit that calling for the genocide of Jews is harassment and terrifying to the Jewish population there. They are sick fucks. No wonder all our young people are so disturbed.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

You can't be serious.

Yes, under the Constitution of the United States, that is true - only when it comes to what the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT can and can't do. But you don't care about the Constitution as evidenced by the various despicable trampings of said document the last 8+ years or so by the party you support with every fiber of your being.

Thus, as you well know, speech does not have to lead to harmful actions IN THIS INSTANCE.

The women answering those questions don't work for the US Gov't, therefore they are not bound by the free speech clause. You know this because you constantly told me this when the social media companies were censoring their asses off during COVID and beyond (even though they were being PRESSURED to do so by the DEMOCRATS and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which is definitely UNCONSTITUTIONAL BEHAVIOR by said Democrats).

These women operate under the rules set forth by the universities who cut their paychecks. They do not operate under the rules set forth in the US Constitution for the US Federal Government.

Stop acting as dumb as you are.

Those universities would NEVER allow white people to walk around campus calling for the death of Black people. They would NEVER allow hateful groups of students to walk around calling for the death of gay or trans people. Those students would likely be EXPELLED immediately.

But call for the death of Jews?

No problem for those women in the hearing, and also no problem for mostpost.

Feel free to carry on students...as long as you don't actually try to kill anyone.

And they (including mostpost) used to tell us TRUMP was "enabling anti-Semitism" in this country while he was president.

Get fucked.

So, what you’re saying is while government can’t infringe on a person’s constitutional rights, private entities can and should. Which of course makes those rights meaningless.

All citizens of these United States operate under the rules set forth in the Constitution. We elect the president and members of congress under those rules. We select judges under those rules. We collect taxes under those rules. We provide for the common defense under those rules. Pepsi Cola can’t tell me what church to go to. Although it can prevent me from constructing an altar inside their bottling plant. Walmart can have me arrested for shoplifting, but they can’t put me in jail without a trial.

Your whole thesis that individuals or organizations are not responsible to the constitution is just ridiculous.

[classhandicapper]

A university can establish its own rules for acceptable behavior and speech (within legal boundaries).

What can't happen is the government telling them to implement rules that prohibit speech the government doesn't want.

That's why Twitter could ban Alex Jones and no was up in arms about free speech other than knowing more moderate voices would eventually also be banned. It was legal. A lot of people including Musk were up in arms about the government pushing Twitter, Facebook etc... to ban and shadow ban articles and people that were critical of government policy on Covid, vaccination and other issues. That's illegal.

If you are a university and you aren't banning calls for genocide, you are probably an anti-semite yourself.

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Elise Stefanic, just another MAGA bully, who doesn’t understand the difference between speech and actions. Unless speech leads directly to harmful actions, it is protected. No matter how repugnant it is. Stefanic’s part of the hearing was five minutes of a 3 3/4 hour hearing.

There were actually many valuable moments. All provided by Democrats and the responses to their question. We learned efforts to protect Jewish students is being hamstrung by Republican efforts to cut funding to civil rights office. We learned specific strategies Universities were implementing to protect students while protecting constitutional rights.


We learned that some Republicans Representatives are dumber than a box of rocks. Including one who thought it would be a good idea for Universities to keep track of what percentage of their faculty were conservatives.

Get some new material, every Republican that makes a Democrat look like a fool in a hearing you call a bully, you keep repeating the same crap, over and over and over again.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by mostpost

So, what you’re saying is while government can’t infringe on a person’s constitutional rights, private entities can and should. Which of course makes those rights meaningless.

All citizens of these United States operate under the rules set forth in the Constitution. We elect the president and members of congress under those rules. We select judges under those rules. We collect taxes under those rules. We provide for the common defense under those rules. Pepsi Cola can’t tell me what church to go to. Although it can prevent me from constructing an altar inside their bottling plant. Walmart can have me arrested for shoplifting, but they can’t put me in jail without a trial.

Your whole thesis that individuals or organizations are not responsible to the constitution is just ridiculous.

I have no words for your ignorance on this topic...except you're not ignorant, as you know full well there is a different set of rules regarding speech when it comes to the Federal Government and the Constitution (which your party threw out the window), as opposed to rules regarding speech in a private university or college.

Do you know how many conservative speakers have been BANNED from speaking in certain private universities and colleges? Loads.

That's just for starters.

Please tell me this is an act and you're really not this stupid.

[horses4courses]

No.....I don't.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

No.....I don't.

It's actually better that way. You're right.

[Inner Dirt]

Now modern progressive liberals do not give a crap about antisemitism? What next? They seem to get stranger by the minute.