insanity on the ballot Arizona

[46zilzal]

If there was ANY consideration that Secretary of State nark Finchem had ANY scruples whatsoever, that belief was shattered into a million conspiracy pieces after his interview on Sixty Minutes Sunday.

Confronted with the EVIDENCE, he was clueless even going to the point of lying about the FBI and finger prints on ballots that simply do not exist,he could only SHOW 4 ballots that were fraudulent (and interviewer Scott Pelly pointed out that these were NOT from the 2020 presidential election but the primary),and has GULPED the Kool Aide, not just sipped it.

https://news.azpm.org/s/95320-fact-c...f-voter-fraud/

About the insurrection riot in Washington on January 6th? His comment: Mark Finchem on June 30, 2022: This entire J6 crap was manufactured to create a narrative that there was an assault on the Capitol. This fits into the Marxist ideology of how do you go to one party rule?

The other two pitiful candidates: Kari Lake and that Ichabod Crane character Blake Edwards, are just as deluded.

Even down ballot they are nuts here in Arizona, Not one, not two, but three ballot initiatives want to take away the rights of voters to determine laws DIRECTLY from their intent via the ballot box...They do in fact become law BYPASSING the biased party dominant legislature...CAN'T have that!, the PUBLIC telling government what THEY WANT!...Not allowed if fascists are at the helm

[PaceAdvantage]

So you're not voting for them?

Maybe you can pass a law preventing them from running...or preventing others from voting for them?

DEMOCRACY!

[PaceAdvantage]

Insanity was actually voting for a dementia-riddled old white man for POTUS in 2020...a man who hid in his basement for most of the campaign and couldn't draw more than a handful of people to the few campaign events he attended...

That's insanity.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Insanity was actually voting for a dementia-riddled old white man for POTUS in 2020...a man who hid in his basement for most of the campaign and couldn't draw more than a handful of people to the few campaign events he attended...

That's insanity.

No insanity is believing that sack of shit got 81 million ballots tallied for him... more than any other presidential candidate in history including Obama. Lost every bellwether county.... and still can't draw a crowd beyond the capacity of a McDonald's lobby.

[46zilzal]

quote from Scott Pelly to Finchem: "You called Arizona the epicenter of fraud — it’s scaremongering,” Pelley says to Finchem's face. “It’s not the fraud that is breaking people’s faith in our elections, it’s people like you.”

ON THE NOSE!

[46zilzal]

3,33,829 votes in the 2020 presidential election in Arizona, and this guy Finchem finds FOUR fraudulent votes...Real FRAUD in the making!!!!

60 lawsuits around the US and the judges refused comment on each of them. WHY? ZERO EVIDENCE that there was fraud.

Recount of the Arizona election required by law when the margin: A recount of the vote is required when the canvass of returns in a primary or general election shows that the margin between the two candidates receiving the greatest number of votes for a particular office, or between the number of votes cast for and against initiated or referred measures or proposals to amend the Constitution of Arizona, is less than or equal to the lesser of the following:

1. One-tenth of one per cent of the number of votes cast for both such candidates or upon such measures or proposals.
2. Two hundred votes in the case of an office to be filled by state electors and for which the total number of votes cast is more than twenty-five thousand.
3. Fifty votes in the case of an office to be filled by state electors and for which the total number of votes cast is twenty-five thousand or less.
4. Two hundred votes in the case of an initiated or referred measure or proposal to amend the constitution.
5. Fifty votes in the case of a member of the legislature.
6. Ten votes in the case of an office to be filled by the electors of a city or town or a county or subdivision of a city, town or county.

Recount satisfied the original result...Then the amateur Cyber Ninja's come it and what do they find?
A draft report of the Republican-backed review of 2020 election results in Arizona’s largest county — which critics derided as a shambolic stunt aimed to further vote-rigging conspiracies peddled by former President Donald Trump — has in fact confirmed the winners, the county said.

The much-delayed report from Cyber Ninjas, a Florida-based firm whose owner had spread pro-Trump conspiracies, had been repeatedly hyped up by Trump himself.

But the draft “confirms the county’s canvass of the 2020 General Election was accurate and the candidates certified as the winners did, in fact, win,” Maricopa County’s official account tweeted Thursday night.

Fiction demonstrated again that the contention of fraud is non-existent

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

quote from Scott Pelly to Finchem: "You called Arizona the epicenter of fraud — it’s scaremongering,” Pelley says to Finchem's face. “It’s not the fraud that is breaking people’s faith in our elections, it’s people like you.”

ON THE NOSE!

It's unfortunate that Scott Pelly only feels the need to confront Republicans with the hard nose questions.

Maybe the next time Biden is on 60 minutes, they will demand to see his medical records like they did for Senator John McCain when he was running for President.

NOPE...they won't...because DEMOCRATS are a PROTECTED CLASS...and THAT IS WHY...even if EVERY VOTE in 2020 was cast legitimately and counted 100% correctly, it was STILL THE MOST RIGGED ELECTION IN HISTORY.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

3,33,829 votes in the 2020 presidential election in Arizona, and this guy Finchem finds FOUR fraudulent votes...Real FRAUD in the making!!!!

60 lawsuits around the US and the judges refused comment on each of them. WHY? ZERO EVIDENCE that there was fraud.

Recount of the Arizona election required by law when the margin: A recount of the vote is required when the canvass of returns in a primary or general election shows that the margin between the two candidates receiving the greatest number of votes for a particular office, or between the number of votes cast for and against initiated or referred measures or proposals to amend the Constitution of Arizona, is less than or equal to the lesser of the following:

1. One-tenth of one per cent of the number of votes cast for both such candidates or upon such measures or proposals.
2. Two hundred votes in the case of an office to be filled by state electors and for which the total number of votes cast is more than twenty-five thousand.
3. Fifty votes in the case of an office to be filled by state electors and for which the total number of votes cast is twenty-five thousand or less.
4. Two hundred votes in the case of an initiated or referred measure or proposal to amend the constitution.
5. Fifty votes in the case of a member of the legislature.
6. Ten votes in the case of an office to be filled by the electors of a city or town or a county or subdivision of a city, town or county.

Recount satisfied the original result...Then the amateur Cyber Ninja's come it and what do they find?
A draft report of the Republican-backed review of 2020 election results in Arizona’s largest county — which critics derided as a shambolic stunt aimed to further vote-rigging conspiracies peddled by former President Donald Trump — has in fact confirmed the winners, the county said.

The much-delayed report from Cyber Ninjas, a Florida-based firm whose owner had spread pro-Trump conspiracies, had been repeatedly hyped up by Trump himself.

But the draft “confirms the county’s canvass of the 2020 General Election was accurate and the candidates certified as the winners did, in fact, win,” Maricopa County’s official account tweeted Thursday night.

Fiction demonstrated again that the contention of fraud is non-existent

Again, even if everything above is true, it was still THE MOST RIGGED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN MODERN HISTORY

[46zilzal]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Again, even if everything above is true, it was still THE MOST RIGGED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN MODERN HISTORY

You must be flat earth believer too if you fall for this ongoing FICTION
I would guess 1960 had more PROVABLE monkey business than this last one.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

You must be flat earth believer too if you fall for this ongoing FICTION
I would guess 1960 had more PROVABLE monkey business than this last one.

You missed the entire point.

I just said, IF EVERY VOTE WAS CAST 100% LEGITIMATELY

and

EVERY VOTE WAS COUNTED 100% CORRECTLY

it was STILL

THE MOST RIGGED ELECTION IN MODERN HISTORY

Your reading comprehension is way off. I've just stated above that I can concede the voting and counting process was 100% VALID and CORRECT and LEGITIMATE, and it was STILL MASSIVELY RIGGED.

If you can't figure the reason why, it is you who is the flat-earther dope.

[PaceAdvantage]

Imagine...46zilzal...the guy who 100% bought into the RUSSIA FIXED THE 2016 ELECTION FOR TRUMP narrative by INFLUENCING PEOPLE TO VOTE based on MISINFORMATION and DISINFORMATION they were supposedly spreading to the American people...

...can't UNDERSTAND what I am saying and continues to think I'm saying the voting process itself was rigged or the counting process was rigged

For a supposed doctor, he's dreadfully slow on the uptake

[46zilzal]

https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...iani-january-6

Pence is on board with the attempted coup being what it was

[PaceAdvantage]

How exactly was it determined that the people gathered in DC on January 6th were there to "overthrow the election?"

Why weren't they there simply to protest what they believed to be a fraud-filled election?

There's a difference, you know.

But the MEDIA, the same entity that RIGGED THE ELECTION for Biden, paints it as they were there to "overthrow the election" and that's what sticks?

Funny how that works, isn't it, 46zilzal?

Show me proof the majority of people who were there that day were there to OVERTHROW THE ELECTION.

I'll be waiting.

[Tom]

46, did you put sugar in your coffee again?

[Dave Schwartz]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

So you're not voting for them?

Maybe you can pass a law preventing them from running...or preventing others from voting for them?

DEMOCRACY!

This is not as far from the truth as you might think.

Here in NV we have an item on the ballot that says primaries should all be non-partisan.

Check this out.
https://yeson3nv.com/

Welcome to the one-party system.