|
|
12-02-2020, 12:08 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,735
|
Barr says no election fraud
and Barr is a complete sack of shit.. why doesn't he just do his dam job that he gets paid for and investigate this election fraud.
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 12:09 PM
|
#2
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,532
|
lamboguy v1.0
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 12:23 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 216
|
Barr
Deep state swamp creature!
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 02:58 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
and Barr is a complete sack of shit.. why doesn't he just do his dam job that he gets paid for and investigate this election fraud.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by epochtimes
In its headline, The Associated Press twisted Barr’s comment to make it appear as if AG Barr had said
|
Nothing new there....^
They are investigating... But if that happens in the same manner as many other investigation. We may never know the results or will come out in 2099.
Nope I'm wrong here...
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 03:05 PM
|
#5
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 3,204
|
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-house-bribery
Or, Bill Barr and his lackeys looked and looked and looked for evidence of election fraud, but didn't find any because there isn't any to find.
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 03:23 PM
|
#6
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,810
|
Funny how Barr never talked to any of those who filed a report about seeing it happen.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 05:07 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burls
|
You're like a person when asked at Tiffany's "See anything you like" saying... Nope I see nothing of value in here at all. This applies to a few other as well.
There is plenty of phuckery that has been presented... to what extent is the only real question.
So... Why the haste to wipe data from voting machines and shred envelopes and doc's?
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 05:46 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,629
|
Barr did not say NO ELECTION FRAUD, not sure what fake news site you got that from
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 06:07 PM
|
#9
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail
Why the haste to wipe data from voting machines and shred envelopes and doc's?
|
Link?
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 07:49 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,586
|
Key note in Barr's statement is "nothing to date".
He hasn't really taken a look either.
|
|
|
12-02-2020, 10:03 PM
|
#11
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,768
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
lamboguy v1.0
|
I think it’s back to the beta version
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
12-03-2020, 12:09 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,361
|
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
|
|
|
12-03-2020, 02:50 PM
|
#13
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail
|
Regarding the outcome to your link:
"In Georgia, U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Batten Sr., a George W. Bush appointee, noted there was “precious little proof” of “tremendous worldwide improprieties regarding the Dominion voting machines,” as argued by attorney Sidney Powell."
https://www.presstelegram.com/2020/1...-in-court/amp/
|
|
|
12-04-2020, 06:15 PM
|
#14
|
$2 Showbettor
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The Villages
Posts: 2,578
|
I don’t see this going anywhere. Biden will be inaugurated president next month. Most of the evidence is circumstantial, but I find it interesting that the democrats think it’s OK to impeach a president on circumstantial evidence but in this case in means nothing.
|
|
|
12-04-2020, 06:58 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redboard
I don’t see this going anywhere. Biden will be inaugurated president next month. Most of the evidence is circumstantial, but I find it interesting that the democrats think it’s OK to impeach a president on circumstantial evidence but in this case in means nothing.
|
Not wanting to derail the thread but if the Ukraine case was circumstantial I'd be curious what you consider a slam dunk.
__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|