|
|
01-13-2018, 11:17 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston Tx.
Posts: 3,130
|
First Indictments Issued In Clinton Uranium One Russian Bribery Case
And I thought that Uranium One was legit.
"The Justice Department issued the first indictment in the Uranium One scandal to the co-president of a Maryland-based nuclear transportation company.
Mark Lambert was charged in an 11-count indictment with wire fraud, money laundering and violating the foreign corruption practices act.
The crimes stem from an alleged scheme orchestrated to bribe officials from a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned energy company Rosatom."
http://www.oann.com/first-indictment...-bribery-case/
__________________
Laboratory rats are susceptible to drug addiction, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
|
|
|
01-13-2018, 11:19 PM
|
#2
|
Resurrectionist
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Cheyenne, Wy
Posts: 3,615
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MONEY
And I thought that Uranium One was legit.
"The Justice Department issued the first indictment in the Uranium One scandal to the co-president of a Maryland-based nuclear transportation company.
Mark Lambert was charged in an 11-count indictment with wire fraud, money laundering and violating the foreign corruption practices act.
The crimes stem from an alleged scheme orchestrated to bribe officials from a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned energy company Rosatom."
http://www.oann.com/first-indictment...-bribery-case/
|
Interesting. Thank you $$$ for the link!
__________________
Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 09:41 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,705
|
You mean that giving donations to the Clinton foundation in exchange for favors from the State Department is not legit?
If this is one of the charges, the flood gate is slowly opening, and a trickle will become a steady stream as the money laundering slush fund gets exposed.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 09:44 AM
|
#4
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 113,052
|
The Clintons have got to have the cleanest danged money in history!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 10:17 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,212
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
You mean that giving donations to the Clinton foundation in exchange for favors from the State Department is not legit?
If this is one of the charges, the flood gate is slowly opening, and a trickle will become a steady stream as the money laundering slush fund gets exposed.
|
The acronym RICO in association with the Clintons will be on everyone's lips before all is said and done with Uranium One and the Foundation.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 10:27 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Mr. Sessions IS doing his job. Crow will be served as requested.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 01:19 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,891
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo
Mr. Sessions IS doing his job. Crow will be served as requested.
|
That would be a very pleasant and welcomed surprise. I would love to stand corrected on that guy.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 02:42 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,705
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker6
The acronym RICO in association with the Clintons will be on everyone's lips before all is said and done with Uranium One and the Foundation.
|
They are saying that over two thirds of the 'players' in the beltway are tied to the Foundation in some way. It would cause a governmental crisis if they took them all down. I guess there will be quite a bit of stench while the swamp gets drained.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 03:01 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
They are saying that over two thirds of the 'players' in the beltway are tied to the Foundation in some way. It would cause a governmental crisis if they took them all down. I guess there will be quite a bit of stench while the swamp gets drained.
|
Sounds like a real s**thole.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 04:19 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,142
|
What was the Uranium One scandal? Of course it was nothing, but what it supposedly was, was that Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of US Uranium to a Russian company in exchange for bribes from the Russians through her family's Foundation.
Of course this all ignores that at least nine other agencies also had to approve the transfer and that there is no proof that any of the donations to the Clinton Foundation personally benefited any of the Clintons. It's just that you all want it to be true so badly.
What does this current, real, scandal have to do with the fake Uranium One scandal. Absolutely nothing!
Mark Lambert bribed (allegedly) Russian officials to obtain contracts to transport nuclear material from Russia to the United States. The material in question was civilian grade nuclear material legally being transported. The crime comes with the bribery.
There is no way that this indictment has any connection with the phony Uranium One scandal. One involved uranium leaving the United States (it wasn't) The other involved uranium coming into the United States (it was legally)
One involved a private citizen of the USA possibly breaking the law. The other involved numerous government officials working within the law.
One (falsely) claimed bribery originating in Russia and coming to the United States. The other actually involved bribery originating in the United States going to Russia.
Is there any evidence that Mark Lambert has any connection to the Clintons?
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 05:00 PM
|
#11
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 113,052
|
mostie, a lot more there than there is in the Trump/RUSSIANS probe.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 06:11 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,705
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
mostie, a lot more there than there is in the Trump/RUSSIANS probe.
|
Not really, the FBI will question people and drill them non-stop for 10 hours about phone calls from months before. Of course they already have transcripts of the phone calls because of their FISA warrants. Then they will charge people with lying to the FBI, because they can not remember every word they said over a phone conversation from months ago.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 08:40 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
If only I was in the casket business about now
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 08:42 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
What was the Uranium One scandal? Of course it was nothing, but what it supposedly was, was that Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of US Uranium to a Russian company in exchange for bribes from the Russians through her family's Foundation.
Of course this all ignores that at least nine other agencies also had to approve the transfer and that there is no proof that any of the donations to the Clinton Foundation personally benefited any of the Clintons. It's just that you all want it to be true so badly.
What does this current, real, scandal have to do with the fake Uranium One scandal. Absolutely nothing!
Mark Lambert bribed (allegedly) Russian officials to obtain contracts to transport nuclear material from Russia to the United States. The material in question was civilian grade nuclear material legally being transported. The crime comes with the bribery.
There is no way that this indictment has any connection with the phony Uranium One scandal. One involved uranium leaving the United States (it wasn't) The other involved uranium coming into the United States (it was legally)
One involved a private citizen of the USA possibly breaking the law. The other involved numerous government officials working within the law.
One (falsely) claimed bribery originating in Russia and coming to the United States. The other actually involved bribery originating in the United States going to Russia.
Is there any evidence that Mark Lambert has any connection to the Clintons?
|
William Campbell-whistleblower was gagged by Holder, Lynch, has not testified yet.
DOJ-Lynch, Yates, Ohr, Carlin, L.Page
FBI-Comey, McCabe, Baker, Preistap, Strzok
Fusion GPS-Simpson, Steele, Clinton, Jacoby, N. Ohr
All guilty. All connected.
Last edited by woodtoo; 01-14-2018 at 08:43 PM.
|
|
|
01-14-2018, 08:50 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,212
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo
William Campbell-whistleblower was gagged by Holder, Lynch, has not testified yet.
DOJ-Lynch, Yates, Ohr, Carlin, L.Page
FBI-Comey, McCabe, Baker, Preistap, Strzok
Fusion GPS-Simpson, Steele, Clinton, Jacoby, N. Ohr
All guilty. All connected.
|
That about sums it up. There WAS a conspiracy in the last election. The truth will come out one way or another, but I know where the smoke is coming from at this point, so my bet's been placed.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|