 |
08-20-2017, 05:19 AM
|
#1
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,790
|
IRS Scandal isn't over yet
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/1...-naming-names/
Interesting why Trump hasn't stepped in?
The Judge just dropped a bomb on the IRS
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 06:43 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,144
|
Last edited by incoming; 08-20-2017 at 06:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 08:50 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
I think Sessions is just starting to get things lined up for the fall of the domino's.
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:42 AM
|
#4
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
I think Sessions is just starting to get things lined up for the fall of the domino's.
|
Pizza-gate?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:44 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,450
|
I wonder if they can do anything about GOOGLE. Those of you who have watched GOOGLE know what I am talking about.
The best example was during the election process. If you clicked on Hillary Clinton, with no other words, you would get all kinds of flowery press telling you how wonderful she was. Do the same for Donald Trump, and you get 100% evil press.
To me, this is fraud. The company claims algorithms that best reflects VOLUME of articles being read.
Note: I rarely check any more, but when I do, the tenor has softened. A bit more balanced. Of course, the news articles will change constantly so when you check, you will not see what I just saw -- which was Trump's approval rating was sinking in three key states being the first (allegedly, the most viewed) story. Yeah, right. 
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:53 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
I wonder if they can do anything about GOOGLE. Those of you who have watched GOOGLE know what I am talking about.
The best example was during the election process. If you clicked on Hillary Clinton, with no other words, you would get all kinds of flowery press telling you how wonderful she was. Do the same for Donald Trump, and you get 100% evil press.
To me, this is fraud. The company claims algorithms that best reflects VOLUME of articles being read.
Note: I rarely check any more, but when I do, the tenor has softened. A bit more balanced. Of course, the news articles will change constantly so when you check, you will not see what I just saw -- which was Trump's approval rating was sinking in three key states being the first (allegedly, the most viewed) story. Yeah, right. |
I switched to Bing about 7 years ago for the same reasons you mentioned. 
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:58 AM
|
#7
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
I wonder if they can do anything about GOOGLE. Those of you who have watched GOOGLE know what I am talking about.
The best example was during the election process. If you clicked on Hillary Clinton, with no other words, you would get all kinds of flowery press telling you how wonderful she was. Do the same for Donald Trump, and you get 100% evil press.
To me, this is fraud. The company claims algorithms that best reflects VOLUME of articles being read.
Note: I rarely check any more, but when I do, the tenor has softened. A bit more balanced. Of course, the news articles will change constantly so when you check, you will not see what I just saw -- which was Trump's approval rating was sinking in three key states being the first (allegedly, the most viewed) story. Yeah, right. |
Never let facts get in the way of your everyone is against us conspiracy theory du jour.
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-b...stories-2017-3
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:59 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,402
|
We've all been defrauded by a goooogle search from time to time.
__________________
"You make me feel like I am fun again."
-Robert James Smith, 1989
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 10:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,450
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
|
Anyone who did google searches during the election period knows the truth. Anyone who says otherwise is just exercising fake news.
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 10:46 AM
|
#10
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,790
|
They can change the results with a flick of the wrist or the click of a mouse. They've been accused of and actually fined in Europe of committing fraud.
I would never think they wouldn't favor Dems. I just assume it based on where their hearts are.....and that's obvious
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
08-20-2017, 09:47 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
|
Sounds like we need to give Goggle a Special Prosecutor enema.
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2017, 03:56 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Federal judge orders IRS to " Name specific people" who directed tea party targeting.
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2017, 05:11 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,648
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo
Federal judge orders IRS to " Name specific people" who directed tea party targeting.
|
you mean like Rep. Elijah Cummings ?
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2017, 06:36 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
That was very hard to watch. No more investigations. Charge them criminally and let the chips fall.
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2017, 07:21 PM
|
#15
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,626
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
I wonder if they can do anything about GOOGLE. Those of you who have watched GOOGLE know what I am talking about.
The best example was during the election process. If you clicked on Hillary Clinton, with no other words, you would get all kinds of flowery press telling you how wonderful she was. Do the same for Donald Trump, and you get 100% evil press.
To me, this is fraud. The company claims algorithms that best reflects VOLUME of articles being read.
Note: I rarely check any more, but when I do, the tenor has softened. A bit more balanced. Of course, the news articles will change constantly so when you check, you will not see what I just saw -- which was Trump's approval rating was sinking in three key states being the first (allegedly, the most viewed) story. Yeah, right. |
Well, the press was 100% positive for Hillary and 100% against Trump.
What do you want Google to do? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
