Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - Sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 3.40 average.
Old 11-10-2013, 10:37 PM   #31
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
It is called parity. You guys are nuts if you think football players are going to go out and not try. That is the easiest way to get injured.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2013, 11:30 PM   #32
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
You know what odds you could have gotten if you made the prediction that the Rams would score the first 35 points of the game in indy? If they run that computer simulation a million times, does even one simulation have Stl up 35-0 on the road vs a team that's supposed to be better than them? I say no.

Hey Whiz, love your "Script falling out of the briefcase" theory, awesome!

The NFL is a multi BILLION dollar business...heck, some of their individual TEAMS are worth over a billion, the entire league and how much money they make is astounding.

Do you think that the NFL and their head honchos would leave ONE THIN DIME on the table if they thought scripting the results would result in more revenue?

If you were the head of a company worth a hundred billion (yep, with a B) or more would you just sit back in your little NYC corner office and just let the teams "battle it out" and have the best man win? Do their high paid execs just let the results fall randomly, or do they have sophisticated computer models that know exactly what they would want to happen in a "perfect world"?

Most of us were born at night, hopefully none of you were born last night.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2013, 09:49 AM   #33
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
Another thing that's a joke about the NFL is the injury process.

Teams hire doctors as their medical staff. Teams then put a gun to these doctors heads and basically tell them to clear anybody who has a pulse and isn't concussed, to play. Then the coach can make a decision and rationalize it by saying "our medical staff cleared him to play".

This is a joke. Cutler tore his groin three weeks ago. I suffered the same injury in baseball in high school, and I guarantee you, if it truly was a tear, no way could somebody play QB well with that little recovery. So late last week, Trestman comes out and says "our staff has cleared Jay to play". The backup, McCoun, already proved he is capable. At full strength for both, Cutler is better. But if McCoun is 100% and Cutler is 60%, it shouldn't be a difficult decision.

Yet Trestman took the easy way out. He started Cutler because he was "cleared to play" yet we all know that's a joke. If Trestman had any balls, he would've overrode the "decision" and started McCoun. But he took the safe approach, knowing he could throw the medical staff under the bus if the decision was proved wrong. And it was proved wrong.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2013, 01:09 PM   #34
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
Quote:
PEDs have been around for a pretty good amount of time in the NFL, so why would it start this year?
Its unbelievable how players have grown over the years. I think Romo is listed as weighting 230 lbs - he don't look no 230 lbs.
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2013, 04:22 PM   #35
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
Another thing that's a joke about the NFL is the injury process.

Teams hire doctors as their medical staff. Teams then put a gun to these doctors heads and basically tell them to clear anybody who has a pulse and isn't concussed, to play. Then the coach can make a decision and rationalize it by saying "our medical staff cleared him to play".

This is a joke. Cutler tore his groin three weeks ago. I suffered the same injury in baseball in high school, and I guarantee you, if it truly was a tear, no way could somebody play QB well with that little recovery. So late last week, Trestman comes out and says "our staff has cleared Jay to play". The backup, McCoun, already proved he is capable. At full strength for both, Cutler is better. But if McCoun is 100% and Cutler is 60%, it shouldn't be a difficult decision.

Yet Trestman took the easy way out. He started Cutler because he was "cleared to play" yet we all know that's a joke. If Trestman had any balls, he would've overrode the "decision" and started McCoun. But he took the safe approach, knowing he could throw the medical staff under the bus if the decision was proved wrong. And it was proved wrong.
Most Everyone in the NFL is playing with some sort of injury, there would be nobody left to play if everyone waited till they were 100%.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2013, 04:48 PM   #36
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Most Everyone in the NFL is playing with some sort of injury, there would be nobody left to play if everyone waited till they were 100%.
There's a big difference between playing hurt and playing injured. Bumps, bruises, minor muscle pulls and even sprains can be played with. Cutler didn't have a muscle pull; he had a tear. Huge difference, and it showed as he was completely uncomfortable, and ultimately ended up hurting his ankle as well as it looks like he will be out against the Ravens. I'd take McCoun at 100% over a 60% Cutler.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-11-2013, 07:18 PM   #37
Marshall Bennett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,596
How many are playing with brain damage? Makes you wonder if for no other reason, the drama that played out in Miami.
Marshall Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-12-2013, 12:54 AM   #38
NJ Stinks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
How many are playing with brain damage? Makes you wonder if for no other reason, the drama that played out in Miami.
Imagine the interest in tonight's outcome if there was no gambling involved....
__________________
One flew east, one flew west,
One flew over the cuckoo's nest.
NJ Stinks is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-12-2013, 08:35 AM   #39
precocity
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,148
I know the cowgirls defence are a bunch of no heart I pulled my hamstring punks!
precocity is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 12:58 PM   #40
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
As for the product slipping in quality, several reasons I believe:

Rule changes that purely favor the offense. I guess I'm a purist but the 51-48 Broncos-Cowboys game was not my idea of perfection. Bad defense had something to do with that. And because the rule changes favor the offense so much, DBs do what they have to do; they hold more and interfere more.

Secondly, with the new collective bargaining agreement, teams are limited in terms of how much time they can spend practicing, and how much hitting goes on. If practice makes perfect, lack of practice breeds inperfections.

Now with the focus on head injuries, how long before tackling is outlawed and they play flag football? The game I see now isn't the same game I grew up watching in the 1970s. The NFL has some real problems down the road.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 01:04 PM   #41
Quagmire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist

Now with the focus on head injuries, how long before tackling is outlawed and they play flag football? The game I see now isn't the same game I grew up watching in the 1970s. The NFL has some real problems down the road.
I agree 100%. That personal foul penalty called against SF late in the game yesterday was ridiculous.
Quagmire is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 01:38 PM   #42
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quagmire
I agree 100%. That personal foul penalty called against SF late in the game yesterday was ridiculous.
Refs don't have the benefit of replay on that play, and live it sure looked like a penalty. Hard to fault them too much in my opinion.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 01:40 PM   #43
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
Now with the focus on head injuries, how long before tackling is outlawed and they play flag football? The game I see now isn't the same game I grew up watching in the 1970s. The NFL has some real problems down the road.
Well, the game in the 1970s was different. It also left a lot of guys walking around with serious problems, and many of them are long dead, way before the life expectancy of a normal person. I can live without that game even if it was better for fans.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 01:49 PM   #44
PhantomOnTour
C'est Tout
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cajunland
Posts: 13,272
The rule I have a problem with is this "extended possession" rule they now have for receptions, esp TD catches.
This is the rule that robbed Calvin Johnson a few years ago and robbed the 49ers yesterday vs the Saints (although they scored on the next play or two).

The Niner receiver caught a pass in the end zone, dragged his second foot in bounds and then out of bounds (which effectively ends the play in my book), only to drop the ball when he hit the ground...which was some two yards out of bounds.
The rule was "no catch" since he didn't hold on through his tumble to the turf.
RIDICULOUS....he established possession and had two feet in bounds. Once that dragged foot makes contact with the ground out of bounds I say the play should end right there....thus a touchdown.
__________________
How do I work this?
-David Byrne
PhantomOnTour is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-18-2013, 04:21 PM   #45
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomOnTour
The rule I have a problem with is this "extended possession" rule they now have for receptions, esp TD catches.
This is the rule that robbed Calvin Johnson a few years ago and robbed the 49ers yesterday vs the Saints (although they scored on the next play or two).

The Niner receiver caught a pass in the end zone, dragged his second foot in bounds and then out of bounds (which effectively ends the play in my book), only to drop the ball when he hit the ground...which was some two yards out of bounds.
The rule was "no catch" since he didn't hold on through his tumble to the turf.
RIDICULOUS....he established possession and had two feet in bounds. Once that dragged foot makes contact with the ground out of bounds I say the play should end right there....thus a touchdown.
Yet, the 'crossing the plane' rule doesnt adhere to the same standards, if you're flying thru the air and extend the ball over the imaginary goal line, its a TD no matter what happens to you before you hit the ground.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.