|
|
05-10-2016, 02:39 PM
|
#1066
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
thank you Parx for making the 4th official w no change. Correct call.
Last edited by Stillriledup; 05-10-2016 at 02:40 PM.
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 06:41 AM
|
#1067
|
GARY
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,339
|
DQ that should have happened and didn't
this one is blatant and I own a horse in this race
Parx race 9 on May 7th
You need to watch the head on the this race, from the start
of this race.
This was a 100k race, My Juliet Stakes, a 100k race .
The winner, #8 veers in causing a severe bumpoing incidsent
with three horses.
Three objections,including a Stewards inquiry and zero action taken.
More to follow
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 01:44 PM
|
#1068
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY BRED
this one is blatant and I own a horse in this race
Parx race 9 on May 7th
You need to watch the head on the this race, from the start
of this race.
This was a 100k race, My Juliet Stakes, a 100k race .
The winner, #8 veers in causing a severe bumpoing incidsent
with three horses.
Three objections,including a Stewards inquiry and zero action taken.
More to follow
|
If it's out of the gate is the precedent is they don't make changes.
|
|
|
05-14-2016, 04:46 PM
|
#1069
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,053
|
Can't see how this horse stays up at parx
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 04:43 PM
|
#1070
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,830
|
A pathetic all around display at Monmouth on the 8th race today. There were three separate incidents---one horse didn't leave the gate, another dumped the rider, and late stretch a horse checked out bad possibly costing second. Instead of showing replays, they fixed the camera on the tote and the always exciting "Inquiry" sign.
Watching the replay, the "head on" is more like a 45 degree angle, but even with that ridiculous view it was easy to see the 4 should have been DQed from 2nd. No replay, no explanation, no nothing. Monmouth looks like a bush league track doing stuff like this.
Last edited by cj; 05-15-2016 at 04:44 PM.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 05:59 PM
|
#1071
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
A pathetic all around display at Monmouth on the 8th race today. There were three separate incidents---one horse didn't leave the gate, another dumped the rider, and late stretch a horse checked out bad possibly costing second. Instead of showing replays, they fixed the camera on the tote and the always exciting "Inquiry" sign.
Watching the replay, the "head on" is more like a 45 degree angle, but even with that ridiculous view it was easy to see the 4 should have been DQed from 2nd. No replay, no explanation, no nothing. Monmouth looks like a bush league track doing stuff like this.
|
Obviously you didn't see the Feature yesterday. They DQed the winner you ran the entire length of the stretch straight as a string on the lead. They claim he crowded the horses behind him when he clear at the quarter poll.
Now here's the kicker. They never post an inquiry. Paco Lopez objected against the top two finishers and the DQed the winner to LAST.
So CJ you've seen a million races like I have. When's the last time you saw a horse DQed from first in a stake on an on objection with no inquiry and placed last. Because I can say prior to yesterday I'd never seen it.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 06:12 PM
|
#1072
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,830
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperPickle
Obviously you didn't see the Feature yesterday. They DQed the winner you ran the entire length of the stretch straight as a string on the lead. They claim he crowded the horses behind him when he clear at the quarter poll.
Now here's the kicker. They never post an inquiry. Paco Lopez objected against the top two finishers and the DQed the winner to LAST.
So CJ you've seen a million races like I have. When's the last time you saw a horse DQed from first in a stake on an on objection with no inquiry and placed last. Because I can say prior to yesterday I'd never seen it.
|
I saw the result but not the race. I did think it was odd. I'll check out the replay. Maybe it was an early message to Jorge?
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 06:13 PM
|
#1073
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: toronto
Posts: 545
|
just want to cry a bit, Belmont 9
not really complaining about the call, i guess it could have gone either way. just sick about what it cost me, .20 super
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 06:47 PM
|
#1074
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 686
|
2016-05-15 SA R4 -
Stewards: ".. the horse veered out and cost the chance of a better placing by causing the other horses to steady.."
Then they provided a replay of the tape to support the call.
Just about the worst freaking call ever. The horse didn't make contact, no bother, just cost them a chance at a better placing?
Last edited by BCOURTNEY; 05-15-2016 at 06:51 PM.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:01 PM
|
#1075
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCOURTNEY
2016-05-15 SA R4 -
Stewards: ".. the horse veered out and cost the chance of a better placing by causing the other horses to steady.."
Then they provided a replay of the tape to support the call.
Just about the worst freaking call ever. The horse didn't make contact, no bother, just cost them a chance at a better placing?
|
I agree it was an awful call. The took the turn for home wider than he would have wanted, but he never hit or impeded the he still went outside with him. That's not interference.
Also the 1/2 chalk basically on level terms with that one thereafter, had the length of the stretch to run on by the 50/1 and couldn't get by. Bad DQ. I knew the longshot players were doomed after the 8 or so minute Inquiry.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:10 PM
|
#1076
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I saw the result but not the race. I did think it was odd. I'll check out the replay. Maybe it was an early message to Jorge?
|
I'm telling you it's worth a look.
Basically stuff that Gordon in every race.
Btw... People who were there described it as a near riot.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:13 PM
|
#1077
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by parlay
not really complaining about the call, i guess it could have gone either way. just sick about what it cost me, .20 super
|
Yeah I watched it in real time and it looked like six just won. But the head on was pretty bad.
Btw... That's at least the four time I can count Junior getting taken down on a horse on the lead drifting in the last year or two.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:26 PM
|
#1078
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I saw the result but not the race. I did think it was odd. I'll check out the replay. Maybe it was an early message to Jorge?
|
Was a message to me got DQD out of the tri. Small money though but money's money. I thought of this when they took him down, the message sending.
|
|
|
05-15-2016, 07:28 PM
|
#1079
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCOURTNEY
2016-05-15 SA R4 -
Stewards: ".. the horse veered out and cost the chance of a better placing by causing the other horses to steady.."
Then they provided a replay of the tape to support the call.
Just about the worst freaking call ever. The horse didn't make contact, no bother, just cost them a chance at a better placing?
|
Easiest call in racing, if the winner stays straight the 5 beats him easy. You can carry someone out but you'd better beat the horse you herd 9 paths out by more than a billionth of a millimeter.
|
|
|
05-18-2016, 05:25 PM
|
#1080
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,830
|
What does Irad have to do to get DQed? At this point I assume a gun has to be involved. He was on the best horse today but simply fouled the 2 horse to get out of a tight spot he put himself into. (Race 8, Belmont, 5-18-2016)
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|