Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-14-2012, 07:21 AM   #1
Pace Cap'n
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,960
Churchill Switches To Point System For Derby Eligibility

This is huge...Graded Stakes earnings no longer count for anything...

"Under the new system, Churchill staff selects which races count toward points. The plan calls for 36 races, as opposed to about 185 races worldwide that counted toward Derby selection under the previous arrangement.The campaign of races leading up to the Derby is being divided into four phases..."

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/horses
Pace Cap'n is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 07:30 AM   #2
sammy the sage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central fla.
Posts: 4,874
Politics...don't ya love it...

""Perhaps the biggest surprise is that the Illinois Derby, worth $500,000 this year and which produced 2002 Derby winner War Emblem, is not a points race.""
__________________
got handed a lemon...make lemonade....add sugar or brown sugar or stevia or my personal favorite....miracle fruit....google it...thank me later...
sammy the sage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 07:37 AM   #3
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
Bad move.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 07:42 AM   #4
iceknight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Bad move.
Did you read the whole article? Do you have any solid reasoning- it would be nice to see that offerred than just "that sucks" responses..

I think the move is good and I have made some comments on my blog . We would have horses that are healthy and in form coming in. Also one hit wonders with big races under the belt or multiple 6f, 7f sprint winners (Trinniberg anyone?) won't be entering and fading in a 10f race!

I do agree in part that massively reducing the no of races that are eligible (eg illinois derby etc) is not a good thing, but they might consider amendments if enough pressure is placed by the public? (change.org - anybody?)

Last edited by iceknight; 06-14-2012 at 07:44 AM.
iceknight is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 07:55 AM   #5
Dahoss9698
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceknight
Did you read the whole article? Do you have any solid reasoning- it would be nice to see that offerred than just "that sucks" responses..

I think the move is good and I have made some comments on my blog . We would have horses that are healthy and in form coming in. Also one hit wonders with big races under the belt or multiple 6f, 7f sprint winners (Trinniberg anyone?) won't be entering and fading in a 10f race!

I do agree in part that massively reducing the no of races that are eligible (eg illinois derby etc) is not a good thing, but they might consider amendments if enough pressure is placed by the public? (change.org - anybody?)
Speaking of solid reasoning...how is this new system going to ensure the Derby horses are in form and healthy coming into the Derby? How does one relate at all to the other?

I like the idea of doing away with sprint races, but disagree with their stance on filly races.
Dahoss9698 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:09 AM   #6
iceknight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
Speaking of solid reasoning...how is this new system going to ensure the Derby horses are in form and healthy coming into the Derby? How does one relate at all to the other?

I like the idea of doing away with sprint races, but disagree with their stance on filly races.
Hey, I did nt say my reasoning was "solid" or ironclad but at least i wasnt saying "This is GREAT" and leaving it at that. I am not too thrilled with the demotion of some of the stakes races in this process... (two sentences dedacted as I had stated incorrectly that Churchill Downs would not have control on prep races. They actually claim they will have control.)

Form to me means that a horse that is competing on regular basis and earning points. Here, although some races offer a lot more points than others, I think it still reduces one race wonder horses from squeaking in on that money alone. I will have to read more in depth and recalculate this year's contenders based on the new points system to see how the field would have played out.
Filly races - i will have to read up on that detail but I thought they were "leveling" the field (for colts/geldings)?

Last edited by iceknight; 06-14-2012 at 08:13 AM.
iceknight is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:30 AM   #7
FenceBored
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
From the FAQ at the Courier-Journal:
Why aren’t any sprints or more grass races included?

Because the Derby is not a sprint and it’s run on dirt.

-- http://www.courier-journal.com/artic...stions-Answers
FenceBored is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:34 AM   #8
FenceBored
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
Another doozy:
Who would have been left out this year?

That’s unfair to say, because trainers might have selected different paths to the Derby under the new rules. But CashCall Futurity winner Liaison, who ranked 12th in graded earnings, would have had only 15 points after finishing no better than fourth in three preps at age 3. The sprinter Trinniberg and Illinois Derby winner Done Talking would not have made the field. Instead the last three in would have been My Adonis, Gung Ho and Teeth of the Dog.

-- http://www.courier-journal.com/artic...stions-Answers
And this would have strengthened the field how?
FenceBored is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:47 AM   #9
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Seems that any qualification they adopt will have some sort of flaws.
For me, though, if you can get away from the Delta Jackpot and the UAE Derby being a free pass into the KY Derby, then you're making progress.
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:51 AM   #10
FenceBored
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses
Seems that any qualification they adopt will have some sort of flaws.
For me, though, if you can get away from the Delta Jackpot and the UAE Derby being a free pass into the KY Derby, then you're making progress.
UAE Derby is still a free pass. They estimate 40 points will get you in the gate and the UAE Derby is in the 100-40-20-10 points category.
FenceBored is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 08:54 AM   #11
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenceBored
UAE Derby is still a free pass. They estimate 40 points will get you in the gate and the UAE Derby is in the 100-40-20-10 points category.
They like to encourage foreign entries, and I suppose that's understandable.
Gives the handicapper an easy horse to eliminate most years, too.
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 09:19 AM   #12
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
A knee jerk thought about the new approach: if they're going to essentially eliminate grass races in the point award system then they should also treat plastic dirt the same.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 09:29 AM   #13
mrhorseplayer
Registered User
 
mrhorseplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,972
I like the comment a poster made about now it would do away with those sprint horses, and how trainers now wont be able to duck one another to take an easier path , wich in return will provide for some good racing IMO
mrhorseplayer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 09:34 AM   #14
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
Quote:
Did you read the whole article? Do you have any solid reasoning- it would be nice to see that offerred than just "that sucks" responses..
I read it and it still sucks.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2012, 10:06 AM   #15
Dahoss9698
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceknight
Filly races - i will have to read up on that detail but I thought they were "leveling" the field (for colts/geldings)?
Yeah it just seems like a weird addition considering there has only been one filly to run in the Derby in the last 13 years and she ran second.
Dahoss9698 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.