Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-07-2021, 03:05 PM   #151
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
remember that race, where they forgot to extract takeout??


When they paid out 16%-25% more of the winning shares??



I don't
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 03:25 PM   #152
Elkchester Road
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Near Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer View Post
remember that race, where they forgot to extract takeout??


When they paid out 16%-25% more of the winning shares??



I don't
Exactly.
__________________
Just when you least expect it...just what you least expect-The Pet Shop Boys.
Elkchester Road is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 04:36 PM   #153
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
Jeff,

Some ADWs might not have the ability to scratch and unscratch a horse and then make the appropriate payouts in the event of scratch/unscratch by the track. I think everyone would have to make sure to get their ducks in a row or you might be looking at a LOT of manual adjustments and a different kind nightmare. (I don't know this to be true, but I have some experience with one of those systems)

My understanding of the way it works is this:

Everything flows from the tote company.

Individual ADWs have UI's (User Interfaces) programmed to display and react to data delivered to the ADW by their Tote Company.

Each tote refresh delivers new data from the Tote Company to the ADW. From there, the ADW UI displays that data - and responds to it accordingly.

For example, if the #5 horse is scratched, that horse will be displayed as a scratch on the UI - and the UI is programmed not to allow the user to wager on that horse.

Suppose the #5 horse is mistakenly scratched. While the #5 horse is mistakenly scratched it will be treated like any other scratched horse in the tote data.

ADW players will see that the #5 horse is scratched - and are simultaneously prevented from keying and submitting wagers on the #5 horse.

But, if on the very next tote refresh - the #5 horse were suddenly available or unscratched in the tote data sent to the ADW:

The ADW's UI should be able to treat that horse like any other live entry - display all tote data for that horse - and allow players to key and submit wagers on it.

Imo, the change would need to be made at the tote level first.

Once that happens - I'm thinking things would flow smoothly to and from the ADW.



-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

Last edited by Jeff P; 11-07-2021 at 04:39 PM.
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 04:42 PM   #154
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
We need to be honest ...

I'm sure the stewards are nice people, and probably accredited and experienced...


It's inappropriate to call the stewards names, or even to blame them for the rampant incompetency...


The managerial people haven't done their due diligence


has to be protocols

has to be training

rules need some level of 'interpretation/judgment' but the current amount of freedom of (arbitrary?) creative decision making is excessive ...

a horse breaks through the gate before the start, and it's questionable whether they are able to view the video frame-by-frame in slow motion...
[we assume they in fact have the technology at the ready]

and then if the horse is a long shot, it's often 'DQ'd, but if the horse is running for an insider owner/trainer and runs 3rd or something, they let the result stand and pay the purse money to the satisfied owner.

- these situations have bettors who singled the horse on top in multis ... and while the 3rd purse is a nice compromise for the insiders, the horse would have probably won if it had not broken early, and then had to be gathered and rushed up outside...


- a favorite herds a long shot and it's OK ?

- two Baffets surge to the lead, and the star draws off, while the stablemate screens off rivals...

- A horse who is much the best surges through a turf pack, and a non-contender who may have run 2nd or 3rd if lucky is affected, and they take down the best horse, who many used in multis on top.
There's no fining the purse difference or something of the connections, they just opt for a silly re-arrangement of taking a horseplayer-selected dominant horse down.

SO MANY THINGS in horse racing, and nobody teaches the Stewards how to consistently handle these things.

And the Stewards are some great horseplayers and some average joes who happened to have the job, and they kind of randomly decide based on the moment...

It's disgraceful of the management in their lack of due diligence.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.

Last edited by Robert Fischer; 11-07-2021 at 04:44 PM.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 06:45 PM   #155
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
The cure of allowing "unscratches" is far worse than the disease. That's just inviting pool manipulation, and would itself leave a bunch of pissed off bettors.

Remember as well, in some parts of Del Mar, there were betting window lines yesterday. You guys are mostly off track and in a position to quickly make new bets, but "unscratching" could screw over people on track.

No way should that CHRB rule prohibiting unscratches ever be changed. Put in a rule that allows them to declare a race an "ALL". And if they want to improve their steward/vet communication, that's great. But no unscratches- that's pure result-oriented thinking based on one weird incident.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 06:53 PM   #156
Michael
Registered User
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
The cure of allowing "unscratches" is far worse than the disease. That's just inviting pool manipulation, and would itself leave a bunch of pissed off bettors.

Remember as well, in some parts of Del Mar, there were betting window lines yesterday. You guys are mostly off track and in a position to quickly make new bets, but "unscratching" could screw over people on track.

No way should that CHRB rule prohibiting unscratches ever be changed. Put in a rule that allows them to declare a race an "ALL". And if they want to improve their steward/vet communication, that's great. But no unscratches- that's pure result-oriented thinking based on one weird incident.
I really like the "all" idea... it's just sounds like a reasonable compromise. (Haven't gave it indepth thought, but I def don't hate the idea)
Michael is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 08:35 PM   #157
LemonSoupKid
Registered User
 
LemonSoupKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 930
It's very simple: the existing rule made no sense. They make more money from bettors and should thus treat them with more respect. Anyone with any sense understands how foolish psychologically it is to let a horse run and then potentially win and not be able to pay. At least some wagers were refunded but us big horizontal players, who put more time and often more money into at least a type of handicapping, get beat up. Im sure they'll change it now, but thats pretty bad. Im just happy it wasnt a 5 fig payout on the line for me.
LemonSoupKid is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 09:12 PM   #158
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
The cure of allowing "unscratches" is far worse than the disease. That's just inviting pool manipulation, and would itself leave a bunch of pissed off bettors.

Remember as well, in some parts of Del Mar, there were betting window lines yesterday. You guys are mostly off track and in a position to quickly make new bets, but "unscratching" could screw over people on track.

No way should that CHRB rule prohibiting unscratches ever be changed. Put in a rule that allows them to declare a race an "ALL". And if they want to improve their steward/vet communication, that's great. But no unscratches- that's pure result-oriented thinking based on one weird incident.
As a bettor I strongly disagree with the above post.

Think about what happened in the last race on Friday.

Stewards are human. And as we've seen more times than I care to count they are subject to human error.

But once human error allowed them to mistakenly scratch a LIVE horse in the last race on Friday:

There was NOTHING in the rules allowing them to correct such an egregious mistake.

The result?

Bettors who individually wagered hundreds, thousands, and some of them tens of thousands in multi-race exotics who had #1 Modern Games on their tickets were given a huge middle finger by the CHRB.

When was the last time you heard on track bettors actually booing the last race of the day at the Breeders Cup?

How do you prevent that from ever happening again?

You PROTECT THE BETTORS by changing the rules and you create tote functionality to restore horses mistakenly scratched by the stewards back into the tote.

The unscratch rule I am proposing:

1. Can only be used to correct horses mistakenly scratched by the stewards.

2. Requires a vote by the stewards to correct a mistake made by the stewards.

That's it.

If you are worried about pool manipulation by the stewards you already have a problem. A steward who is dishonest already has the ability to disqualify any horse in any race from its actual finish position and have it officially placed anywhere he or she wants. (Not allowing them to correct a mistakenly scratched horse isn't going to change that.)

Imo, there ARE a few ways to do this intelligently with on track bettors in mind.

When scratches (and potential unscratches) occur on days when a track has an unusually large crowd:

Track management can easily tell the gate crew to wait a few minutes to give on track betters the chance to make additional wagers just like they sometimes do for regular scratches.

The incident that happened in the last race on Fri took place as the sun was sinking over the horizon. Del Mar doesn't have lights. There was a 15 to 20 minute delay. At one point I was wondering if they would have to cancel the race due to darkness.

But 99 days out of 100 at California tracks on track attendance isn't so big that track management can't tell the gate crew to wait a minutes until the lines at the windows empty out.

Also:

On track players do have the option to use a track issued handheld wifi device to wager.

Many on track players also have smart phones and ADW accounts. Guarantee you they are using them now for additional late wagers when regular scratches occur.

Making a race an ALL:

Making races where the stewards have mistakenly scratched a horse an ALL also screws bettors who have correctly selected the mistakenly scratched horse in their multi-race exotics because they collect pennies on the dollar for the ALL absent the stewards' boneheaded mistake compared to what they know they will collect when the mistakenly scratched horse running for purse money only wins.

As a bettor:

I'd much rather give the stewards the ability to correct a mistake before the race goes off.

I'm guessing I'm not the only bettor who sees it this way.


-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

Last edited by Jeff P; 11-07-2021 at 09:17 PM.
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 10:08 PM   #159
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Jeff, sports are full of uncorrectable errors. If the refs blow the whistle in a basketball or football game you can't un-blow the whistle. And that can mean a touchdown gets taken away.

If a hockey referee fails to stop a fight, a player can get seriously hurt and miss games and even face real life consequences. But you can't go back and reverse that.

If a referee stops a boxing match, he can't un-stop it. If a referee fails to stop a round and an illegal punch gets thrown, there's no such thing as an un-punch.

Colorado once won a national football championship because they were awarded 5th down in a crucial game.

Uncorrectable errors are part of the world of sports, which means they are also part of the world of betting on sports. They are part of the risk you assume when you decide to bet on a sports event, including a horse race. If it is a risk you don't want to assume, you don't have to bet. As Andy Beyer once said, there are safer investments out there.

Seriously, this was a one-off. You can run 100,000 horse races and not see another incident like this. So why the heck would we do something that could introduce real uncertainty in races just before post time just because we fear another 1 in 100,000 incident?

You pays your money, just like we all do, and you takes your chances. That's how horse racing works.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-07-2021, 11:35 PM   #160
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,813
Anybody know how the gate guy is?
JustRalph is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2021, 12:25 AM   #161
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
Anybody know how the gate guy is?
I heard he was working the next day.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2021, 12:26 AM   #162
dnlgfnk
Registered User
 
dnlgfnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis suburb
Posts: 1,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
Anybody know how the gate guy is?
__________________
"I like to come here (Saratoga) every year to visit my money." ---Joe E. Lewis
dnlgfnk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2021, 12:27 AM   #163
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Jeff, sports are full of uncorrectable errors. If the refs blow the whistle in a basketball or football game you can't un-blow the whistle. And that can mean a touchdown gets taken away.
While the other sports are wagered on, the leagues have nothing to do with the rules and regulations regarding betting.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2021, 08:13 AM   #164
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
I think you just can't have a horse running for purse money only. I realize this is punitive to the owners, but otherwise it's punishing the general public.

I didn't actually see the 10th on Friday or the incident. But I've heard there was very little time between the announcement the horse was scratched and when they realized it could race. Why not just announce what happened, then back all the horses out, and give the public 5-10 minutes to adjust? No need to scratch; no need to run for purse money only. And no incident we are talking about 3 days later.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2021, 10:21 AM   #165
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,613
Quote:
But, if on the very next tote refresh - the #5 horse were suddenly available or unscratched in the tote data sent to the ADW:

The ADW's UI should be able to treat that horse like any other live entry - display all tote data for that horse - and allow players to key and submit wagers on it.

Imo, the change would need to be made at the tote level first.

Once that happens - I'm thinking things would flow smoothly to and from the ADW.
That's the problem. Not all the ADWs might have code in place to do that right now. There would have to be some changes made.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.