SPEED 2013

[Sly7449]

I have noticed an ad stating "an eye-popping +82% ROI."

Does anyone have any Reviews on this Product that was recently released?

http://horsebettingsuccess.com/speed-2013/

Thanks

Sly

[appistappis]

you should hurry and order, they might run out.

[MightBeSosa]

"After considering not making the method public at all, I stopped at 100 races (actual total in the published recap you receive with the method ran to 102 races by end of the betting day on Jan. 4th.) to write up the method for distribution."

I'm no statistics guru, but I suspect a 100 race trial would have less significance then say, a teen girl liking Justin Beiber.

[thaskalos]

A rare sight. An intelligent, seemingly well-informed con man.

[ArlJim78]

I like the last comment from Andrew Q. Serling today.

I’m concerned that as I accumulate great wealth with your method, I will
start to hurt the payoffs.
Can you offer any sustenance?

[andicap]

Originally Posted by appistappis

you should hurry and order, they might run out.

[shouldacoulda]

Originally Posted by MightBeSosa

"After considering not making the method public at all, I stopped at 100 races (actual total in the published recap you receive with the method ran to 102 races by end of the betting day on Jan. 4th.) to write up the method for distribution."

I'm no statistics guru, but I suspect a 100 race trial would have less significance then say, a teen girl liking Justin Beiber.

@ +$0.82 ROI I would be dipped in "you know what" before I would write a book. I would accumulate great wealth instead at the track.

[VastinMT]

I used this method at the track two days ago and became wealthy beyond my wildest dreams!

Then I spent yesterday buying up all the other copies available!

Sorry, you snooze, you lose!!!

[traynor]

This provides a great example of the use of small models. With a bit of digging, one can find clumps of races to "prove" almost anything. There is not much difference between a 100 race "model," a 300 race "model," and a 1000 race "model." None are especially predictive. The only thing they show is what happened in the past, not what will happen in the future.

[thaskalos]

Originally Posted by traynor

This provides a great example of the use of small models. With a bit of digging, one can find clumps of races to "prove" almost anything. There is not much difference between a 100 race "model," a 300 race "model," and a 1000 race "model." None are especially predictive. The only thing they show is what happened in the past, not what will happen in the future.

This is not a case of being misled by using small models.

This is a case of someone telling outright lies in order to profit from the ignorance of the gullible public.

If a system like this really existed...it would never be sold by its creator.

[lamboguy]

Originally Posted by thaskalos

This is not a case of being misled by using small models.

This is a case of someone telling outright lies in order to profit from the ignorance of the gullible public.

If a system like this really existed...it would never be sold by its creator.

its no different than all of our politians

[timtam]

I purchased this method and after reading it over I realized it was pretty
much the same as Tom Consoles FG. He actually advocates betting as
many as 3 horses in one race but usually 2. Got had again

[shouldacoulda]

Originally Posted by timtam

I purchased this method and after reading it over I realized it was pretty
much the same as Tom Consoles FG. He actually advocates betting as
many as 3 horses in one race but usually 2. Got had again

Thanks for the review. Sorry you got burned.

[timtam]

The reason I was upset was because it advocated 2 or 3 horses per race.
I've been using it to get contenders in exactas and tris. With some tweeking
its ok but I was under the impression it narrowed the field to one horse thus
the high percentage is somewhat deceiving.

[Mike A]

Was this written by Clint Tracy, or Dick Eastwood?