Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-11-2022, 10:01 PM   #1
tamaharbor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 285
Evidence of maternal and paternal age effects on speed in thoroughbred racehorses

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/d...98/rsos.220691
tamaharbor is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-12-2022, 04:41 PM   #2
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,597
The math is over my head, but right away I wonder if they had a good way to control for quality?

For example, it's likely that Flightline is going to get a lot of very high quality mares to breed to in the early years, especially if the first crop looks good. But by the time he reaches a certain age, even if he still active, the quality of the mares will probably decline. The highest quality ones will move on to the latest hot sire. I'm sure the same is true for the very best mares. That alone would impact the speed of the offspring. You'd have to control for that. It could almost be a self reinforcing outcome where if so and so is 15, they stop sending him the best mares, he produces slower horses, so they end him even lower quality mares etc..
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-13-2022, 01:24 PM   #3
usfgeology
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
The math is over my head, but right away I wonder if they had a good way to control for quality?

For example, it's likely that Flightline is going to get a lot of very high quality mares to breed to in the early years, especially if the first crop looks good. But by the time he reaches a certain age, even if he still active, the quality of the mares will probably decline. The highest quality ones will move on to the latest hot sire. I'm sure the same is true for the very best mares. That alone would impact the speed of the offspring. You'd have to control for that. It could almost be a self reinforcing outcome where if so and so is 15, they stop sending him the best mares, he produces slower horses, so they end him even lower quality mares etc..
They sort of address that phenomenon albeit not directly. From the article…

“Specifically, if high sire quality is erroneously inferred from strong early life performances by a truly average sire, then increasing age brings more data and the estimated merit of that sire will decline towards the mean. In this study, we avoid this potential source of bias by analysing all sires represented irrespective of perceived (or actual) quality.”
usfgeology is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-13-2022, 08:56 PM   #4
tbwinner
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,021
Admittedly I did not read the study yet.

But I recall the wisdom being...the older the mare, the more successful the offspring. Meaning a mares foals later in her life are better than her first borns.
tbwinner is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-14-2022, 09:18 AM   #5
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,278
EVERY OVUM produced by any female, was created when they were still a fetus, so on the distaff side of the coin,that is a long time for free radicals to do their damage.
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-14-2022, 11:17 AM   #6
BarchCapper
Registered User
 
BarchCapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
EVERY OVUM produced by any female, was created when they were still a fetus, so on the distaff side of the coin,that is a long time for free radicals to do their damage.
Glad for whatever damage those free radicals did to the ovum 17 year old Somethingroyal conceived with in 1969!!!!!
__________________
Tom in NW Arkansas
——————
”Past performances are no guarantee of future results.” - Why isn't this disclaimer printed in the Daily Racing Form?
BarchCapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.