Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-20-2023, 10:16 AM   #121
BarchCapper
Registered User
 
BarchCapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
Probably a pretty good measuring stick. The rest……?

I still think there should be about 10 tracks tops
I think we should follow the Australian model - 1 track for approximately every 73,000 people. (25.69 million, ~350 tracks)

330 million population in US = ~4500 tracks

__________________
Tom in NW Arkansas
——————
”Past performances are no guarantee of future results.” - Why isn't this disclaimer printed in the Daily Racing Form?
BarchCapper is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 07:50 AM   #122
mike_123_ca
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 66
Toronto closed 5 tracks over the years. There are some nice pics in the link below for those, like myself, that like to reminisce about the good old days.

https://www.blogto.com/city/2012/04/...ke_in_toronto/
mike_123_ca is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 08:51 AM   #123
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,614
I hijacked his from the Jerry Brown thread because it's more relevant here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crestridge View Post
What's wrong with Hong Kong's formula: few tracks, large handle, honest management, more basis toward honesty and strict rules enforced, class ratings, free past performances, many horses in the race, large attendance at the tracks, etc. Just two, three days a week, something to research.
This is where I suspect we are heading in terms of size. We'll see about the rest.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 11:19 AM   #124
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_123_ca View Post
Toronto closed 5 tracks over the years. There are some nice pics in the link below for those, like myself, that like to reminisce about the good old days.

https://www.blogto.com/city/2012/04/...ke_in_toronto/
that was E.P Taylor's move
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 12:36 PM   #125
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,285
Seems to be going over well with the No. Ca. horse community.


https://www.drf.com/news/leading-nor...on-plan-viable
__________________
Best writing advice ever received: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will suffice.
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 01:16 PM   #126
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
I hijacked his from the Jerry Brown thread because it's more relevant here.



This is where I suspect we are heading in terms of size. We'll see about the rest.
i agree...no tobacco and a lot fewer horses in Ky...at least they have bourbon
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 05:18 PM   #127
Thomas Roulston
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lakehurst, NJ
Posts: 1,035
The only hope for racing in NoCal to be revived is the installation of turf courses at all of the fair circuit tracks - and for the tracks to lengthen and juggle the dates of their meets in such a way that there is continuous racing between the Labor Day weekend and the Memorial Day weekend.
Thomas Roulston is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 06:33 PM   #128
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
I would'tt think they will be investing much capital in a fair track.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?

Last edited by Tom; 07-21-2023 at 06:35 PM.
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 08:21 PM   #129
elhelmete
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Roulston View Post
The only hope for racing in NoCal to be revived is the installation of turf courses at all of the fair circuit tracks - and for the tracks to lengthen and juggle the dates of their meets in such a way that there is continuous racing between the Labor Day weekend and the Memorial Day weekend.
The fairs are in the summer.
elhelmete is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2023, 11:14 PM   #130
craigbraddick
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 657
Thomas:

Check out what CARF have planned. Your answer is not the ONLY answer. In fact, it is not even the most likely answer. I understand people's disillusion but seriously here is a chance to get behind and support something that will bring nearly year round racing to Northern California. Instead people just go online and deliver statements like the one you did when they can easily read about what is going on and say: "That is a great idea, what can I do to support it?" Or say the opposite - instead of just deciding this is the ONLY way forward.

CB
__________________
http://racecallercraig.blogspot.com
www.twitter.com/callstheraces
craigbraddick is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-22-2023, 02:56 PM   #131
horsefan2019
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
If that quote from one of the owners in the Norcal circuit is the majority of the opinions, then there might be hope for them. They probably won't ship their horses to Socal and figure out how to setup something that works to their benefit. Frankly the logistics and costs don't make sense. You are going to ship your horses 400 miles down south to a more competitive circuit where there isn't much benefit to you and your costs increase dramatically. They might just be better off enlarging a fair circuit and base their operations around there.
horsefan2019 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-22-2023, 03:18 PM   #132
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by horsefan2019 View Post
If that quote from one of the owners in the Norcal circuit is the majority of the opinions, then there might be hope for them. They probably won't ship their horses to Socal and figure out how to setup something that works to their benefit. Frankly the logistics and costs don't make sense. You are going to ship your horses 400 miles down south to a more competitive circuit where there isn't much benefit to you and your costs increase dramatically. They might just be better off enlarging a fair circuit and base their operations around there.
I am not going to make predictions on who ships and who doesn't, but in general it's mistaken to say they can't compete down here. What would happen if they all did ship is that SoCal tracks would start carding races attractive to the shippers. So you'd see Maiden 16 races and $4k claimers and stuff. Indeed, you'd probably see races mostly filled with NorCal horses along with some people moving up from Los Al short track thoroughbred races.

If they came, some of those horses would win some races down here.

(On another note, I am highly skeptical of the expansion of the fairs to create a full NorCal circuit for another reason-- these fair meets will lose a lot of money, and the fairs are publicly owned and accountable to taxpayers. Frank Stronach could, of course, subsidize Northern California racing because owning racetracks is his hobby. But I assume people would start getting voted out of office if money intended to support agriculture in California- which is what the fairs are supposed to be about- gets incinerated on horse racing instead.)
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-22-2023, 04:11 PM   #133
GaryG
Unreconstructed
 
GaryG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Appalachia
Posts: 6,646
California racing was at its best when there was one circuit. This pretty much ended when Oak Tree was established. In those days NoCal got some top class horses and the Golden Gate Mile was a big race. But that wasn't enough action, so it became two year round circuits. Increased Fair dates sounds like an endless summer, but it was a dismal failure when Del Mar tried it. It doesn't matter, racing as we knew it is gone. The class disparity between our horses and the Euros is widening as well.
__________________
Deo Vindice
GaryG is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-22-2023, 04:14 PM   #134
horsefan2019
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
I am not going to make predictions on who ships and who doesn't, but in general it's mistaken to say they can't compete down here. What would happen if they all did ship is that SoCal tracks would start carding races attractive to the shippers. So you'd see Maiden 16 races and $4k claimers and stuff. Indeed, you'd probably see races mostly filled with NorCal horses along with some people moving up from Los Al short track thoroughbred races.

If they came, some of those horses would win some races down here.

(On another note, I am highly skeptical of the expansion of the fairs to create a full NorCal circuit for another reason-- these fair meets will lose a lot of money, and the fairs are publicly owned and accountable to taxpayers. Frank Stronach could, of course, subsidize Northern California racing because owning racetracks is his hobby. But I assume people would start getting voted out of office if money intended to support agriculture in California- which is what the fairs are supposed to be about- gets incinerated on horse racing instead.)

Frank doesn't run the company anymore. I doubt he is the one closing down the track. I see this more as the company getting max value from selling the land under which Golden Gate Fields sits at. And most likely not putting it back into the business.


Also I have a hard time believing the company is going to put up so much money to entice these guys to ship their cheap horses down south. It doesn't make financial sense. What is more likely is they are getting out of the smaller tracks and recouping what they can get out of it.
horsefan2019 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-22-2023, 06:08 PM   #135
horsefan2019
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryG View Post
California racing was at its best when there was one circuit. This pretty much ended when Oak Tree was established. In those days NoCal got some top class horses and the Golden Gate Mile was a big race. But that wasn't enough action, so it became two year round circuits. Increased Fair dates sounds like an endless summer, but it was a dismal failure when Del Mar tried it. It doesn't matter, racing as we knew it is gone. The class disparity between our horses and the Euros is widening as well.

The highlight of the California meet these days is the Del Mar summer meeting. Hard to replicate that considering a lot of that is due to the location and weather.
horsefan2019 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.