Err…So You’re SURE Trump Wasn’t RIGHT About Russia Collusion??!

[PaceAdvantage]

YouTube

[PaceAdvantage]

This is a brilliant video, btw.

[davew]

how long has he been exposing left loony conspiracies?

[PaceAdvantage]

The real interesting point here is...Hillary Clinton and her sycophants went on for YEARS telling us all the election of 2016 was DEFINITELY RIGGED by Trump and Russia (complete with manufactured evidence)...and she has suffered ZERO consequences for doing this, up until this point...

Hillary's LIES about the 2016 "rigging", which actually helped RIG 2020 (and don't tell me it didn't...a healthy portion of the population believed Trump conspired with Russia to win the 2016 election) -- will be treated as a nothingburger to those who clung to it THE MOST(post).

But Trump's thoughts on the 2020 election are deemed "THE BIG LIE" by the media, non-stop, 24-7 til this very day...

For this Trump is still labeled a GIANT THREAT to our democracy (along with many other, similarly manufactured fake reasons)...the very democracy Hillary helped to basically destroy in 2020.

With that said, here's my message to all of you (and you know who you are):

YouTube

[classhandicapper]

The mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, Wash Post etc..) are basically the propaganda arms of the moderate democrats, Marxists, left leaning intelligence community, and assorted vermin on the left with influence on the democrats.

That's why FOX, OANN, Newsmax, and conservative talk radio etc.. came into existence. They are the response to everything else being biased, but they are biased in the opposite direction.

People in the media may think they are doing the right thing because of their own personal politics, but when your job is to call out the politicians and government for lying and corruption and instead you become an extension of the lying and corruption, you have become a BAD person.

People that actually expose corruption (like Julian Assange) seem to wind up in all sorts of trouble. That's where we are now.

[Tom]

The only threat to our democracy is the democrat party.

[Jeff P]

A long read. But Imo a pretty good article about the mainstream media's role (and cover-up) in Russia Russia Russia --

Lee Smith | December 02, 2021
Here Comes the Limited Hangout:
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/n...gout-lee-smith

America’s Nixonian press corps takes a page from the Watergate playbook to try and cover up its active role in the criminal Russiagate hoax

Russiagate was not a collective miscue committed by dedicated, albeit overzealous and perhaps gullible reporters. Rather, it was an intelligence operation targeting a U.S. president. The main media players were not pixielike and paranoiac TV celebrities or even glib establishment cable TV newsreaders. They were reporters from the country’s two most prestigious newspapers.

A closer look at the stories cited by the Pulitzer committee celebrating the Post’s and Times’ Russia work sheds light on how they worked with spy services to prosecute the operation. The first story cited by the Pulitzer Prize committee, “Officials say Flynn discussed sanctions,” is the Post’s follow-up attack on Flynn, dated Feb. 9, 2017, almost a month after Ignatius’ initial strike. This story is also sourced to a leak of a classified transcript of Flynn’s call with the Russian ambassador, confirmed by nine U.S. officials—in other words, it is evidence of at least nine people committing a felony by leaking information from a foreign intelligence intercept. Its authors, Greg Miller, Adam Entous, and Ellen Nakashima, appear to have been the intelligence services’ chosen partners, since they published numerous leaks of classified information to facilitate the cover-up.

In other words, all of Russiagate—the initial crime and the criminal cover-up—is based on the dossier. No matter how much reporters now try to sever themselves from it while maintaining Trump really did collude with Russia, there was only ever the dossier.

So should the Pulitzer committee strip the Post and the Times of their 2018 prize, as Trump and many of his supporters are saying? By no means. That would only further obscure the damage the media have done to American citizens, U.S. national security, and government institutions during the past several years. The press sponsored an intelligence operation that, among many other outrages, violated the privacy rights of an American citizen (Page); forced another to flee his adopted home for fear of false imprisonment (Millian); dragged a decorated combat veteran through the mud and cost him his home and millions of dollars in legal fees (Flynn); interfered in an election, and helped spies target the president through leaks of classified information. Demanding they simply return the awards they use to credential themselves obscures the larger truth. Instead, it would be more fitting for the Post and Times to have the prize’s citation emblazoned on their mastheads for posterity to commemorate how they injected poison into the national bloodstream and burned down our free press.

-jp

.

[davew]

well, at least they earned a Pulitzer prize