|
|
11-09-2020, 02:21 PM
|
#31
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Here's your ongoing process of evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaVEppGkTQw
It's Rudy, so you will say it's not evidence.
But...you asked for it...so here it is.
He directly addresses your claim of "no evidence."
Witnesses are evidence. They always have been. They always will be.
Whether the evidence turns out to be credible or not remains to be seen.
But there is evidence.
|
Lol yeah he's a clown. But if there are actual witnesses, great, let's hear from them in court. So far all I see is "some guy told me so".
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:27 PM
|
#32
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
None of the evidence shown you thus far was enough for you, and likely nothing will ever be...so why bother?
You can just keep replying with the cute "So no evidence...thanks"
I'm not actually trying to convince you of anything, because I don't really care whether you believe it or not. You're not one who has any impact on this process.
|
Perhaps because there hasn't really been any so far? And what has been presented, like the WI registered voter thing, was an absolute lie.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:32 PM
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baystater
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
So no evidence. Got it.
|
If someone says they will take someone out and repeats it numerous times, then makes numerous unsuccessful attempts to do so - then all of a sudden the person shows up dead...
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:45 PM
|
#35
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
You're picking on PA Mike's stating "VOTING FRAUD for 4+ years." You're playing a game of semantics. You know exactly what he meant...but, then again, maybe you don't. I wouldn't be surprised.
"You all..." is an out and out LIE! A statement like that just tells me that you would have been a perfect hire for the Demos at one of the counting stations.
|
It's not a game of semantics, what are you talking about? In response to me thinking that him yelling about mass fraud is ridiculous, he said "VOITING FRAUD for 4+ years". When I asked for proof of Dems complaining about the type of voter fraud about which Republicans are currently complaining, he couldn't give any. Then you ask me why I'm asking that? It's a reasonable question. And how you either A not following the argument, or B trying to distort it.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:47 PM
|
#36
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
Not at all what I said...you don't understand, obviously.
No one on here has claimed to be "super intelligent;" although, you have certainly implied that for yourself..."got it?"
The mutual gratification is all about you and YOUR ilk...get real!
|
Find me one place where I've implied whether I'm intelligent or not. If I had a nickel for every time some right leaning poster on here told me I couldn't think straight or that I'm an idiot or the list goes on and on, I'd have millions of dollars.
I've seen posts here claiming that the entire Democratic party is filled with idiots. So most of the posters here are smarter than 50%+ of the population? Give me a break. The most common rebuttal here is to try and belittle someones intelligence, which implies an inflated view of ones own intelligence
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:49 PM
|
#37
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyb
If someone says they will take someone out and repeats it numerous times, then makes numerous unsuccessful attempts to do so - then all of a sudden the person shows up dead...
|
I guess this is a metaphor? For engaging w voters, championing mail in voting during a pandemic, highlighting the failures and recklessness of the other side? If that's a successful attempt to "take someone out", then yeah, good job.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:50 PM
|
#38
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,905
|
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 02:54 PM
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
Also, do you simply not read the prior posts? You all keep bringing up how Dems claimed there was massive voter fraud as a reason for why we should be entertaining Trump's claims. I'm asking you, when did they do that? Seems like a reasonable follow up question...
|
I take it you live under the Tacoma Narrows Bridge... The sun is out be careful your kind turn to stone in the light of day.
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 04:07 PM
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
So no evidence. Got it.
|
For some reason democrats weren't interested in "evidence" during the Kavanaugh hearings. One woman with no one else to back up her story (even her best friend at the time) was enough.
Now we have several real time witnesses to fraud, and dems ignore it. Par for the course
If this gets to the USSC, Justice Thomas gets his sweet revenge on Biden. Kavanaugh gets his on Harris. ACB gets off to a good start. Good times. Good times
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 04:18 PM
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Here's your ongoing process of evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaVEppGkTQw
It's Rudy, so you will say it's not evidence.
But...you asked for it...so here it is.
He directly addresses your claim of "no evidence."
Witnesses are evidence. They always have been. They always will be.
Whether the evidence turns out to be credible or not remains to be seen.
But there is evidence.
|
Of a feeble-minded delineated has been ex lawyer who acted blindly as a "useful idiot" manipulated by both the Russians and Ukrainians?
Wakey wakey
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 04:22 PM
|
#42
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElKabong
For some reason democrats weren't interested in "evidence" during the Kavanaugh hearings. One woman with no one else to back up her story (even her best friend at the time) was enough.
Now we have several real time witnesses to fraud, and dems ignore it. Par for the course
If this gets to the USSC, Justice Thomas gets his sweet revenge on Biden. Kavanaugh gets his on Harris. ACB gets off to a good start. Good times. Good times
|
Who? Provide links? And not "some guy" on twitter quoting "some other guy".
Also, EL OH EL at the "But Democrats weren't..." response again. PA, you should work on an auto draft feature for the site that explains away any negative with "But Democrats..."
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 04:59 PM
|
#43
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ketchikan,AK
Posts: 2,086
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
Find me one place where I've implied whether I'm intelligent or not. If I had a nickel for every time some right leaning poster on here told me I couldn't think straight or that I'm an idiot or the list goes on and on, I'd have millions of dollars.
I've seen posts here claiming that the entire Democratic party is filled with idiots. So most of the posters here are smarter than 50%+ of the population? Give me a break. The most common rebuttal here is to try and belittle someones intelligence, which implies an inflated view of ones own intelligence
|
You must be using the same math they are using on counting ballots, on your nickel for every post that they told the truth about you. I really think you are exaggerating just a little bit. Just a wee bit, Ya think!
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 05:45 PM
|
#44
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,290
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
|
Interesting video. Thanks for posting it.
For those of you with zero interest in watching all 58 minutes:
If you want to know how our voting networks are structured and some of the entry points where they are vulnerable, watch from the 19:20 mark to the 29:20 mark.
The video claims to show proof of tampering in Kentucky in the 2018 election starting at about the 30:50 mark.
The video goes on to show tampering in the 2020 election starting at about the 40:10 mark.
And the video discusses how we can do better going forward starting at about the 48:00 mark.
-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Last edited by Jeff P; 11-09-2020 at 05:49 PM.
|
|
|
11-09-2020, 05:51 PM
|
#45
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,652
|
who needs evidence when it just does not FEEL right?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|