Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 06-03-2009, 07:58 PM   #76
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
I'm not sure what your saying. Is Equibase right or is Emerald Downs right?
What I am saying is you don't have to ask. Just go watch the REPLAYS and see for yourself.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:00 PM   #77
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
What I am saying is you don't have to ask. Just go watch the REPLAYS and see for yourself.

We're Talking about a lot of tracks around the country that this affects. I have an email to Equibase asking them where they get their data for the run ups.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:03 PM   #78
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
I already answered that in another thread, they get it from the chart caller. I find it hard to believe the chart caller is going to lie. If so, why make up various distances for the run up, just report the same one. But again, I haven't watched yet to see.

You could know who is right and who is wrong in five minutes rather than firing off emails and waiting for self serving replies.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:13 PM   #79
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I already answered that in another thread, they get it from the chart caller. I find it hard to believe the chart caller is going to lie. If so, why make up various distances for the run up, just report the same one. But again, I haven't watched yet to see.

You could know who is right and who is wrong in five minutes rather than firing off emails and waiting for self serving replies.
CJ nothing surprises me anymore. I initially thought Equibase was right but now I'm not so sure. It seems like every time I look into something after assuming something I get a surprise. I want to get these people on the record with their emails so I can post them for all to see. With a couple more days of information I may be able to get someone to write an article on this stuff.

Last edited by andymays; 06-03-2009 at 08:15 PM.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:17 PM   #80
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
OK, so I took the Saturday card and looked them up and watched the replays:

Distance-runup:

8.0 25
6.0 40
6.5 24
6.0 40
5.5 60
6.5 24
6.0 40
6.5 24
6.0 40

If I had to make a bet, I would bet on the chart caller. There are clearly differences in the run up between the 5.5, 6, and 6.5f races. No way are they all "approximately" 50 feet.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:24 PM   #81
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
OK, so I took the Saturday card and looked them up and watched the replays:

Distance-runup:

8.0 25
6.0 40
6.5 24
6.0 40
5.5 60
6.5 24
6.0 40
6.5 24
6.0 40

If I had to make a bet, I would bet on the chart caller. There are clearly differences in the run up between the 5.5, 6, and 6.5f races. No way are they all "approximately" 50 feet.

You are probably right. The one run up that surprises me is the Mile run up. Most two turn mile tracks have longer run ups for mile races because of the short distance to the first turn.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:25 PM   #82
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
It looked pretty accurate, not much of a run up.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:27 PM   #83
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
It looked pretty accurate, not much of a run up.

Since you seem to know what to look for what exactly are you looking for when measuring the run up?
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:33 PM   #84
Charlie D
Registered User
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gods County, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,533
At a gues, Chart caller will probably use the rail posts

Last edited by Charlie D; 06-03-2009 at 08:35 PM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:36 PM   #85
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D
Chart caller will probably use the rail posts

Aren't we looking for the point from the starting gate where the timer is placed and tripped?
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:40 PM   #86
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
It is pretty easy to see the gate and the poles and eyeball the distance, and using the rails helps in some instances.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:43 PM   #87
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
It is pretty easy to see the gate and the poles and eyeball the distance, and using the rails helps in some instances.

The timer is always place on or near the poles?
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:43 PM   #88
Charlie D
Registered User
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gods County, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
Aren't we looking for the point from the starting gate where the timer is placed and tripped?
You are. I'm just guessing the spacing of the rail posts is what the chart caller uses to estimate the run up.


Someone like CJ however, may know otherwise
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:44 PM   #89
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
The timer is always place on or near the poles?
Dude, you are making this WAY too complicated. If they are timing a 6f race, the timer will be at the 6f pole. Same for a mile, and any other distance. Now, odd distances like 1m70y will be tougher, but the standard ones just aren't this tough. EmD is wrong.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2009, 08:50 PM   #90
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Dude, you are making this WAY too complicated. If they are timing a 6f race, the timer will be at the 6f pole. Same for a mile, and any other distance. Now, odd distances like 1m70y will be tougher, but the standard ones just aren't this tough. EmD is wrong.

Thanks for taking the time to give me the info. I appreciate it! There was also a 20 foot discrepancy with Churchill at 6F. Equibase said it was 100 ft and Churchill says it's 80 feet!

Last edited by andymays; 06-03-2009 at 08:52 PM.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.