Trump is so over

[Tom]

Libs are all talky no walky.

[dartman51]

Originally Posted by Clocker

But Bernie is very concerned about global warming!

Hey, don't blame Bernie, he's just following the example of his fearless leader, Al Gore.

[ronsmac]

Originally Posted by Tom

That dinosaur?
His time was 2000 BC!

Trump, Clinton and Sanders are all dinosaurs. All three are old as dirt.

[fast4522]

Originally Posted by ronsmac

Trump, Clinton and Sanders are all dinosaurs. All three are old as dirt.

To accurately counter that statement one could say, both Donald J. Trump and Bernie Sanders have energy levels that rival much younger men.

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by mostpost

If you took advantage of student loans to finance your college education and are now trying to stop today's students from taking advantage of that same program, that is what is known as hypocrisy.

No, if I did that, it would be rational behavior. If the feds are giving away my tax money for no good purpose, I would be stupid not to grab some of it if I could.

[hcap]

So much rightie bullshit about "dinosaurs" when it is beginning to look like The Trumposaur the Foxosaur and yep even the GOPosaur is facing extinction in 2016.

From Nate Silver of 538 who the right LOVED immediately after the RNC mini bounce. It was a PA off topic premature ejaculation to say the least.

What A Clinton Landslide Would Look Like

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...uld-look-like/

...Perhaps the strongest evidence for a potential landslide against Trump is in the state-by-state polling, which has shown him underperforming in any number of traditionally Republican states. It’s not just Georgia and Arizona, where polls have shown a fairly close race all year. At various points, polls have shown Clinton drawing within a few percentage points of Trump — and occasionally even leading him — in states such as Utah, South Carolina, Texas, Alaska, Kansas and even Mississippi.

Just how bad could it get? Let’s start by giving Clinton the 332 electoral votes that Obama won in 2012. That’s obviously not a safe assumption: The race could shift back toward Trump, and even if it doesn’t, Clinton could lose states such as Iowa or Nevada, where her polling has been middling even after her convention bounce. But as I said, we’re going to focus on Clinton’s upside case today.

...So I’m going to list the states Romney won in order of how easy it is for Clinton to flip them, according to our polls-only model.1 The number in parentheses by each state represents the point at which the model estimates it would flip to Clinton, based on her lead in the national popular vote. For instance, South Carolina (+9.5) means that Clinton would be favored in South Carolina if she leads by at least 9.5 percentage points nationally, but not by less than that. These projections are based on where the model has each state projected currently, along with each state’s elasticity score, a measure of how responsive it is to changes in the national environment. Here goes:

read the rest at the link. Bye bye buffoon.

[Fager Fan]

I'd understand the glee if you had an honorable and exciting nominee. You have instead an immoral, corrupt, lying politician who only got the nomination due to the political power she and her husband wield. Her sins are serious and they should have her in jail, yet you're happy to have her as your President?

Your party couldn't even put up an ethical, decent human being, so I don't know what the hell youre crowing about.

[Capper Al]

Originally Posted by Tom

Libs are all talky no walky.

And Trump supporters are all wacky and not smarty.

[Capper Al]

Originally Posted by Fager Fan

I'd understand the glee if you had an honorable and exciting nominee. You have instead an immoral, corrupt, lying politician who only got the nomination due to the political power she and her husband wield. Her sins are serious and they should have her in jail, yet you're happy to have her as your President?

Your party couldn't even put up an ethical, decent human being, so I don't know what the hell youre crowing about.

Who declares that she is immoral? Fox News? The courts didn't find her guilty. But are you like many in the middle-easst who don't believe in the western concept of law and a court system? Are you?

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by Capper Al

Who declares that she is immoral?

The 55-60% of Americans who say that they have an unfavorable opinion of her in polls because she is not honest or trustworthy.

[Capper Al]

Originally Posted by Clocker

The 55-60% of Americans who say that they have an unfavorable opinion of her in polls because she is not honest or trustworthy.

Fox and Friends paid a lot of money and worked hard to bring this about. It didn't hold up in court or under Congressional investigation. But I bet you don't believe in these American institutions.

[reckless]

Originally Posted by Capper Al

Fox and Friends paid a lot of money and worked hard to bring this about. It didn't hold up in court or under Congressional investigation. But I bet you don't believe in these American institutions.

It must be tough to live in the vacuum of childlike fantasy. Fox and Friends... behind all this?

Here's the latest from a Pulitzer Prize winning author, who happens to be a left of center journalist and not your typical semi-literate scribbler for The Daily Kos.

By Edward Klein/ August 9, 2016

A month has passed since FBI Director James Comey ripped into Hillary Clinton for the “extremely careless” way she handled classified emails while she was secretary of state, but stopped short of recommending that criminal charges be brought against her.

However, that doesn’t mean Hillary is out of the FBI woods.

According to a source close to Comey, Hillary is still the target of an active FBI criminal investigation, but this time around, the media aren’t paying much attention.

With little public fanfare, Comey’s agents have been looking into Hillary’s relationship with foreign businessmen and governments who donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and are suspected of having received favors from the secretary of state in return.

Such pay-to-play behavior falls under the category of “public corruption,” and Comey’s agents are trying to determine whether Hillary conducted a series of secret meetings with foreigner donors separate from her duties as secretary of state.

Several people interviewed by the FBI have confirmed that Hillary did just that on numerous occasions while she was at the State Department.

“There are a sizable number of agents on this case,” said the source. “I don’t know exactly how many. It’s fewer than were assigned to the email case, but it’s still dozens of agents. By any measure, it’s a major investigation.

“Comey is taking every precaution against leaks while the investigation is ongoing. He’s ordered all the agents on the case to sign non-disclosure agreements and submit to random lie detector tests.

“While this public-corruption investigation is going on, the FBI is also looking into new information that, as a result of Hillary’s carelessness, hostile states like Iran hacked into her email system and compromised U.S. intelligence sources and personnel.

“Hillary shouldn’t imagine that she’s free and clear. Comey may have pulled his punches the last time around because he didn’t think his case was winnable in a court of law, but it’s possible that new evidence could shock the country and make Hillary a very vulnerable presidential candidate.”

[Tom]

It must be tough to live in the vacuum of childlike fantasy. Fox and Friends... behind all this?

Chris Wallace is under his bed, and O'Rielly is in his closet.

[ronsmac]

Originally Posted by fast4522

To accurately counter that statement one could say, both Donald J. Trump and Bernie Sanders have energy levels that rival much younger men.

Maybe. I don't see them all day everyday , but when you're that old you fall off of a cliff fast. You can age 10 years in a year.

[Fager Fan]

Originally Posted by Capper Al

Who declares that she is immoral? Fox News? The courts didn't find her guilty. But are you like many in the middle-easst who don't believe in the western concept of law and a court system? Are you?

You need a court or anyone else to tell you what is moral and immoral?

Either you have no morals yourself, or you're so confused you need others to tell you who is moral and immoral, but I neither lack morals or am confused about who possess them.