Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
I see this argument a lot...but I just can't agree with it.
IMO...you weigh the good points of a book against the bad...and THEN you decide if the book is worthwhile or not. If a book offers "one or two gems", but it also includes thirty ill-conceived or misleading ideas...then how "great" a job has the author done...and how is this book ever to pay for itself?
Are the beginning players, who are the mostly likely targets of these books, really expected to dig through a pile of questionable advice so they can find the one or two "gems"?
|
Perhaps I should have said that if after reading a book you are a better handicapper and bettor, then the book will pay for itself, sometimes many times over.
It may be a couple of nuggets that you were missing in your tool box that gives you the "
aha moment" that improves your play.