Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 05-22-2012, 03:57 PM   #1
gm10
Registered User
 
gm10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ringkoebing
Posts: 4,342
Thistledown: Irregular betting prompts investigation into Monday's fifth race

I love thinking and reading about arbitraging strategies .... I wonder which one they used here. It could have been in conjunction with betting on Betfair, that would be straightforward if the liquidity was big enough.

"Ohio racing officials have launched an investigation into a flurry of last-second bets on the fifth race at Thistledown on Monday, the officials confirmed on Tuesday morning."

http://www.drf.com/news/thistledown-...ays-fifth-race
gm10 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 04:01 PM   #2
tzipi
Registered User
 
tzipi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,034
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=94447
tzipi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 04:21 PM   #3
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,512
arbing
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 04:34 PM   #4
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
They could have gotten down 30k in win bets with bookmakers. They win 192 minus the bet minus the pool manip. Not sure about the bets to show though
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:00 PM   #5
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetHorses!
They could have gotten down 30k in win bets with bookmakers. They win 192 minus the bet minus the pool manip. Not sure about the bets to show though
Everyone is forgetting the most important thing though. Would they get paid? Very unlikely IMO. Rule numbers 1-10 with off shore books is NO POOL MANIPULATION!
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:11 PM   #6
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Everyone is forgetting the most important thing though. Would they get paid? Very unlikely IMO. Rule numbers 1-10 with off shore books is NO POOL MANIPULATION!
Agree but prob not offshore...plus offshore has tiny limits for that track. Could also be bot error. I was just speculating. Cant figure it out
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:15 PM   #7
edmond1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 168
Thistledown was not offered on Betfair on Monday.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gm10
I love thinking and reading about arbitraging strategies .... I wonder which one they used here. It could have been in conjunction with betting on Betfair, that would be straightforward if the liquidity was big enough.

"Ohio racing officials have launched an investigation into a flurry of last-second bets on the fifth race at Thistledown on Monday, the officials confirmed on Tuesday morning."

http://www.drf.com/news/thistledown-...ays-fifth-race
edmond1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:16 PM   #8
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetHorses!
Agree but prob not offshore...plus offshore has tiny limits for that track. Could also be bot error. I was just speculating. Cant figure it out
Gotcha, but i still doesn't change the getting paid part.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:26 PM   #9
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Gotcha, but i still doesn't change the getting paid part.
100%
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 05:32 PM   #10
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
One other thing to toss out there is....the accounts where the 5000 bets came from could have been hacked or fraudulant. Lets see where investigation leads
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-22-2012, 11:54 PM   #11
BlueShoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Anaheim,California
Posts: 4,675
This type of thing is not new, it was done long before there was such a thing as ADW's, OTB, or computers. Way back in the 1930's a famous betting coup was pulled off at the old Agua Caliente track that many turf historians are familiar with, the so called Linden Tree incident, owned by Baron Long, part owner of the track. The horse was a standout, and right at post time a group of men hired by Long hit the windows and bet every other horse in the race. Because of the small pools they were easy to manipulate. In the meantime Long and his cronies heavily bet Linden Tree with bookies all around the country. The horse won easily at an inflated price and created quite a stink. The track stewards conducted an investigation, and supposedly barred Long and kicked him out of his own racetrack. All this back in the era of paper mutuel tickets and friendly bookmakers on almost every corner.
BlueShoe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2012, 06:53 PM   #12
vikingrob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 123
Hayson-Fletcher coup revisited

This smacks of a betting coup involving a greyhound race in Australia a few years ago - bet all the other horses/dogs in the race through the mutuel pool at the last possible moment and bet the heavy favorite through bookmakers who don't bet back (or suspect a need to bet back or lay off the bet). The bookmakers lost about 1 million AUD that way.

I wonder if this was a case where a bookmaker thought worst case would be a loss of about $6k or so and took the action.

Last edited by vikingrob; 05-23-2012 at 06:55 PM.
vikingrob is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-24-2012, 12:46 PM   #13
trigger
Registered User
 
trigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by vikingrob
This smacks of a betting coup involving a greyhound race in Australia a few years ago - bet all the other horses/dogs in the race through the mutuel pool at the last possible moment and bet the heavy favorite through bookmakers who don't bet back (or suspect a need to bet back or lay off the bet). The bookmakers lost about 1 million AUD that way.

I wonder if this was a case where a bookmaker thought worst case would be a loss of about $6k or so and took the action.
More: http://www.drf.com/news/thistledown-...-still-mystery
trigger is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-11-2012, 08:56 PM   #14
jorcus99
Registered User
 
jorcus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 56
This is the thing that bothers me the most. Robotic wagering accounts for 10%
of the wagering in the US! Why is any computer allowed to automaticly tie into the tote system? Do they get a last look at the odds?

"Crawford acknowledged that the odd amounts of the win and show bets on Eye Look the Part pointed to the use of a computerized robotic wagering program. The programs, which account for at least 10 percent of the handle on U.S. horse races, analyze pool totals searching for inefficiencies, and they typically place bets in odd amounts because of the program’s ability to calculate the impact of the bets on the odds."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stop the robots!
jorcus99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-11-2012, 11:31 PM   #15
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorcus99
This is the thing that bothers me the most. Robotic wagering accounts for 10%
of the wagering in the US! Why is any computer allowed to automaticly tie into the tote system? Do they get a last look at the odds?

"Crawford acknowledged that the odd amounts of the win and show bets on Eye Look the Part pointed to the use of a computerized robotic wagering program. The programs, which account for at least 10 percent of the handle on U.S. horse races, analyze pool totals searching for inefficiencies, and they typically place bets in odd amounts because of the program’s ability to calculate the impact of the bets on the odds."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stop the robots!
the general manager of Tampa Bay Downs, Peter Berube, thinks that is what is going on and he never gave contracts to offshore rebate shops, Elite and RGS. there may be other places with those capabilities that i don't know about too.
since i am not set up with those capabilities, i don't bet the races that can be handicapped with an odds model because i know i am going to be an automatic loser. the races that i bet, the prices tend to go up on the horses that i bet.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.