Brave brave woman.....Doctor

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

The field results extended well beyond her clinic and into several countries. I posted many links about same last week.

Would you accept someone telling you they can flap their arms and fly, without seeing them lift off? Yes, there are unexpected discoveries and advances, but

A reminder

[TJDave]

Here is the latest from the good doctor:

YouTube (Short URL)

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by TJDave

Here is the latest from the good doctor:

https://youtu.be/cu6CUYXpXKo

I didn't watch it yet...but whatever it is...does it automatically make her a bad doctor?

Based on the title of the video, I assume it has to do with religion...what's next? Ban all Jews from being doctors because they don't believe in JC as the messiah?

You're probably one of those who think a "business executive" who donates privately to the Trump re-election campaign should be fired from his job.

[jk3521]

Originally Posted by TJDave

Here is the latest from the good doctor:

https://youtu.be/cu6CUYXpXKo

Sounds like a joyful message to me! God loves the United States ,she chants, But God loves us all, there are no boundaries on any map. I like the echo effect, even though she is only preaching to a camera in front of a screen. She needs to add some fake crowd noise , like the MLB.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Would you accept someone telling you they can flap their arms and fly, without seeing them lift off? Yes, there are unexpected discoveries and advances, but

A reminder

The results of many recovered patients verify the drugs efficacy.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by jk3521

Sounds like a joyful message to me! God loves the United States ,she chants, But God loves us all, there are no boundaries on any map. I like the echo effect, even though she is only preaching to a camera in front of a screen. She needs to add some fake crowd noise , like the MLB.

She has added civil worship to her liturgy, i.e. nationalism, which is spiritually dangerous.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

The results of many recovered patients verify the drugs efficacy.

How do you know that bunky? The whole point is to evade Murphy's Law. Present in all endeavors. If it can go wrong, it will go wrong. Applies in setting up the conditions of a proper clinical trial. Collecting and tabulating the evidence, and in analyzing the results. And people can go wrong in acting out an agenda interfering with perhaps good intentions.

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Thus, a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is a medical study involving human participants in which neither side knows who's getting what treatment and placebo are given to a control group.

Studies follow a hierarchy in terms of the quality of evidence that they can provide. Randomized double blind placebo control (RDBPC) studies are considered the “gold standard” of epidemiologic studies.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

She has added civil worship to her liturgy, i.e. nationalism, which is spiritually dangerous.

Do you take her seriously?
No doubts?

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

How do you know that bunky? The whole point is to evade Murphy's Law. Present in all endeavors. If it can go wrong, it will go wrong. Applies in setting up the conditions of a proper clinical trial. Collecting and tabulating the evidence, and in analyzing the results. And people can go wrong in acting out an agenda interfering with perhaps good intentions.

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Thus, a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is a medical study involving human participants in which neither side knows who's getting what treatment and placebo are given to a control group.

Studies follow a hierarchy in terms of the quality of evidence that they can provide. Randomized double blind placebo control (RDBPC) studies are considered the “gold standard” of epidemiologic studies.

I believe the articles I read. How do you know "science" is being truthful when they tell you HCQ is ineffective against covid-19?

Also, is the "Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial" the only valid way of testing?

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Do you take her seriously?
No doubts?

She appears to be from a Pentecostal or Charismatic background, and these groups can hold to some strange beliefs. I haven't bothered to explore her website to see what she's all about personally because I don't have the time.

[JustRalph]

I don’t care if she’s a voodoo priestess from the Louisiana swamp.

She has 350+ patients who have recovered. She’s worth a listen.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

I don’t care if she’s a voodoo priestess from the Louisiana swamp.

She has 350+ patients who have recovered. She’s worth a listen.

Exactly!

[horses4courses]

Word up.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

Word up.

Racist

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

I believe the articles I read. How do you know "science" is being truthful when they tell you HCQ is ineffective against covid-19?

Also, is the "Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial" the only valid way of testing?

The science that has found no effectiveness for HCQ, followed the "gold standard of investigating new medications, have correctly employed peer-reviewed "Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial procedures, thus having a greater chance of discerning truth regarding HCQ, than poorly conducted studies subject to many more human errors and random failures that creep into all human endeavors. Peer-review double checks a study with those peers most qualified to verify that study.

As I suggested, have your far right wealthy "heroes" including Trump, quickly put up or shut up, and fund proper peer-reviewed "gold standard" trials, so your HCQ studies meet proper standards, and have more credence