Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Handicapper's Corner


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-19-2019, 09:52 PM   #1
deelo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: LNN
Posts: 524
Making figures for new tracks

So with Arizona Downs and Century Mile opening as new tracks soon, how do you go about setting figures? Reliable par times would be essential whether you're a speed capper or pace capper but where do we begin? Do you wing it for a while, then at some point you decide you have a large enough sample size to set pars, variants, etc?

Seems to me the entire first meets are just a guessing game and there's a huge edge to be gained for anyone willing to do the work and learn these new tracks from their genesis. Just a thought.
__________________
They didn't take your money...You paid for lessons
deelo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-19-2019, 09:57 PM   #2
TheOracle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by deelo View Post
So with Arizona Downs and Century Mile opening as new tracks soon, how do you go about setting figures? Reliable par times would be essential whether you're a speed capper or pace capper but where do we begin? Do you wing it for a while, then at some point you decide you have a large enough sample size to set pars, variants, etc?

Seems to me the entire first meets are just a guessing game and there's a huge edge to be gained for anyone willing to do the work and learn these new tracks from their genesis. Just a thought.
Hey Deelo

Would you look at Trainers who had success at nearby tracks to see if maybe that would transfer over to the new tracks?

Given that you have no numbers to go by at the new locations maybe you take a look at what the Trainers are doing

Just a thought

Last edited by TheOracle; 04-19-2019 at 10:01 PM.
TheOracle is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-19-2019, 10:24 PM   #3
deelo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: LNN
Posts: 524
Not so much looking at trainers, but how to form a pace figure out of scratch.

Perhaps some type of translation by comparison database? Using made-up numbers here, like something along the lines of TUP horses that run a 77 pace meeting SUN horses with the same 77. When they run at Az Downs, recording that and starting to form sort of a figure by comparison? Like maybe I set TUP as the par so a 77 there becomes a 77 at Az Downs, then with more info I start translating it to where a 82 from SUN is a 77 at AzD, a 68 from Zia is a 77 at AzDowns, etc...

Not sure if that makes sense, I just know there's tons of smart programming and figure people on here that could lend good ideas.
__________________
They didn't take your money...You paid for lessons
deelo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2019, 07:07 PM   #4
castaway01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by deelo View Post
Not so much looking at trainers, but how to form a pace figure out of scratch.

Perhaps some type of translation by comparison database? Using made-up numbers here, like something along the lines of TUP horses that run a 77 pace meeting SUN horses with the same 77. When they run at Az Downs, recording that and starting to form sort of a figure by comparison? Like maybe I set TUP as the par so a 77 there becomes a 77 at Az Downs, then with more info I start translating it to where a 82 from SUN is a 77 at AzD, a 68 from Zia is a 77 at AzDowns, etc...

Not sure if that makes sense, I just know there's tons of smart programming and figure people on here that could lend good ideas.
I'd consider posting this question in a different forum on the site. The Oracle has sort of taken over this forum as his own so most people don't look at it. There are a lot of smart figure makers here (including CJ, one of the experts in the field) but they're probably not seeing this post.
castaway01 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2019, 07:24 PM   #5
TheOracle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by deelo View Post
Not so much looking at trainers, but how to form a pace figure out of scratch.

Perhaps some type of translation by comparison database? Using made-up numbers here, like something along the lines of TUP horses that run a 77 pace meeting SUN horses with the same 77. When they run at Az Downs, recording that and starting to form sort of a figure by comparison? Like maybe I set TUP as the par so a 77 there becomes a 77 at Az Downs, then with more info I start translating it to where a 82 from SUN is a 77 at AzD, a 68 from Zia is a 77 at AzDowns, etc...

Not sure if that makes sense, I just know there's tons of smart programming and figure people on here that could lend good ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01 View Post
I'd consider posting this question in a different forum on the site. The Oracle has sort of taken over this forum as his own so most people don't look at it. There are a lot of smart figure makers here (including CJ, one of the experts in the field) but they're probably not seeing this post.
Hey Deelo

Please post on this site or any other that you choose I haven't taken over anything or called it my own

If you want to post here feel free your ideas are always welcome

Please don't feel that I am stopping you or anyone else to post

Thanks
TheOracle is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2019, 08:40 PM   #6
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by deelo View Post
So with Arizona Downs and Century Mile opening as new tracks soon, how do you go about setting figures? Reliable par times would be essential whether you're a speed capper or pace capper but where do we begin? Do you wing it for a while, then at some point you decide you have a large enough sample size to set pars, variants, etc?

Seems to me the entire first meets are just a guessing game and there's a huge edge to be gained for anyone willing to do the work and learn these new tracks from their genesis. Just a thought.
I personally don't use pars at all. I use projections from the horse's previous races. Even for new tracks, the horses have to come from somewhere and I'll have numbers for them.

The tougher part is establishing a baseline for a speed chart. I believe Century Downs is going to be a mile oval and pretty standard. I'll make figures and see if any distances look quirky, check that run ups don't very too much at different distances, etc. Arizona Downs is the old Yavapai and I think the track is the same. Not necessarily speed wise, but dimensions.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2019, 04:57 AM   #7
sjk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,105
I wait until they have run for three weeks so there is some data to work with.

For the conditions that have been run I copy pars from a track that I would expect to be similar (same state usually).

Those pars and the race times are used to make crude par times. With par times and the three weeks results I can make variants for the races run; my variants use pars but 95% of the information used is projection from previous races.

With all of my variants I recalculate every few weeks to take account of more recent events so with these crude variants I would immediately recalculate all of the pars, par times and variants a few times to converge them to more accurate values.


Since I have no interest in betting Az tracks (interest level in race betting not what it used to be; there are not enough playable races and edge to make it worthwhile) I will probably not bother with the new tracks this time.

Had to do this quite a bit over the years for on-going tracks when they changed the layout or made major changes to the surface and it has generally worked out well.

Last edited by sjk; 04-21-2019 at 04:59 AM.
sjk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2019, 08:13 PM   #8
deelo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: LNN
Posts: 524
thanks guys, those were both helpful insights.

very well may not be playable but never hurts to be prepared just in case. if i happen to come up with any kind of meaningful model once they start i will post.
__________________
They didn't take your money...You paid for lessons
deelo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-29-2019, 08:50 PM   #9
HuggingTheRail
BC Canada
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,286
The additional challenge with Century Mile - the track it is replacing - Northlands, was a 5 furlong bullring. Some of the jockeys go elsewhere during the winter - Turf Paradise, etc, but many jocks sit idle. Some have little experience riding a mile track. The perennial leading rider -Rico Walcott is out indefinitely due to some serious health issues.

It could take a while to get a feel for Century Mile

Also, the weather has still been dicey in Edmonton - snowed there on Saturday so the track could be slow...but maybe not..haha

You could compare some of the early season sprint times to the early season sprint times from last year (remembering that 6f would have been 2 turns at Northlands) and try to gauge how much quicker these 1 turn races are...start with that as a benchmark, and go from there....

Good luck!!
HuggingTheRail is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2019, 10:05 PM   #10
bobphilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I personally don't use pars at all. I use projections from the horse's previous races. Even for new tracks, the horses have to come from somewhere and I'll have numbers for them.

The tougher part is establishing a baseline for a speed chart. I believe Century Downs is going to be a mile oval and pretty standard. I'll make figures and see if any distances look quirky, check that run ups don't very too much at different distances, etc. Arizona Downs is the old Yavapai and I think the track is the same. Not necessarily speed wise, but dimensions.
I couldn't agree more about the value of using projections over pars. Abilities and times can vary considerably within classifications and pars pay no attention to the form cycle of the horses in the race. When doing projections form is vital in projecting what figure a horse will run that day in addition to the individual abilities of the top finishers in that race
bobphilo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-01-2019, 03:52 PM   #11
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,528
I would start out using the figures I have for the horses that have been running at other tracks to make projection figures. I'd use some kind of standard distance chart.

Once I got going, I'd pay close attention to whether certain distances are running faster or slower than expected based on that chart. If so, I'd start tweaking the chart.

I would also create class PARs based on similar tracks in the area and the ongoing data as I accumulated it.

I think class PARs are useful. We are all going to have some biases in our thinking that will tend to create figure drift when we use projections alone. Looking at PARs will help anchor that so your figures won't start getting progressively faster or slower.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-01-2019, 05:18 PM   #12
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
I would start out using the figures I have for the horses that have been running at other tracks to make projection figures. I'd use some kind of standard distance chart.

Once I got going, I'd pay close attention to whether certain distances are running faster or slower than expected based on that chart. If so, I'd start tweaking the chart.

I would also create class PARs based on similar tracks in the area and the ongoing data as I accumulated it.

I think class PARs are useful. We are all going to have some biases in our thinking that will tend to create figure drift when we use projections alone. Looking at PARs will help anchor that so your figures won't start getting progressively faster or slower.
I honestly wouldn't even know where to start with making pars any more. There are so many conditions and so many class levels it would take literally a decade or more to get any kind of real sample size.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2019, 02:26 PM   #13
JohnGalt1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,230
I just received Cynthia par book. They have pars for AZD, CTM, and Cnl.

I assume the rating for AZD and Cnl are from Yavapai and the previous meeting at Cnl.

I will use until proven they are unreliable for the current track surfaces.
JohnGalt1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2019, 06:27 PM   #14
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I honestly wouldn't even know where to start with making pars any more. There are so many conditions and so many class levels it would take literally a decade or more to get any kind of real sample size.
The major tracks aren't that hard. I look at the most commonly run classes for older horses and makes those. For some classes you may not have enough of a sample, but after awhile you'll know where the class fits relative to some that you do have. So you can make an estimate for those.

For 2yos and 3yos you can break it into 3 month periods. You'll usually get enough data to make some reasonable estimates if you have multiple years of races.

The really oddball classes you aren't going to have data for and it's probably not worth worrying about, but if you read the conditions and look at the purse relative to other classes on the circuit, you'll usually know approximately where it fits.

The problem is not doing it for the circuit you play on all the time where you sort of already know the pecking order of statebreds, claimers, open and how they move back and forth. The problem is the dozens of circuits you are starting fresh with where you don't already know what's going on and there are a lots of odd ball classes. That's a monumental task.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-07-2019, 04:16 AM   #15
steveb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I honestly wouldn't even know where to start with making pars any more. There are so many conditions and so many class levels it would take literally a decade or more to get any kind of real sample size.

are there official ratings for horses in your country?
most countries have them these days.

if there is, then you would no longer need to worry about class types/conditions, because you could solve the issue with simple regression analysis.
steveb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.