Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-07-2017, 06:50 PM   #121
Lemon Drop Husker
Veteran
 
Lemon Drop Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
I fully support abortion till a person is 18 years old.

Ma or Pa don't like or want him/her? So be it.

Hasn't shown a single skill of any aptitude? Later tater. '

The biggest problem our planet will face isn't global warming, but over-population.
Lemon Drop Husker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-07-2017, 07:14 PM   #122
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
I'm pretty sure there's no birth control for men similar to women. Don't forget that outside of a permanent physical procedure, the proof of meeting any birth control standard would be non-tamper proof.

And it most certainly does matter. You can't require something of only one sex in order to get gov welfare. It'd lose in any court, and would lose 9-0 in the Supreme Court, and rightly so.

Not the mention how government control of a person's body, particularly the poor, would be seen as unacceptable to all but a few. It would make us comparable to China. It'll fail in public perception and in the courts.

So come up with another idea because this one has exactly zero chance of becoming reality.
I knew a guy doing research with 'gossypol' as a male long term contraception. I just checked and it looks like for 20% of the people it is not reversible. They have been / are using it in China...
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-07-2017, 08:21 PM   #123
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
I'm pretty sure there's no birth control for men similar to women. Don't forget that outside of a permanent physical procedure, the proof of meeting any birth control standard would be non-tamper proof.

And it most certainly does matter. You can't require something of only one sex in order to get gov welfare. It'd lose in any court, and would lose 9-0 in the Supreme Court, and rightly so.

Not the mention how government control of a person's body, particularly the poor, would be seen as unacceptable to all but a few. It would make us comparable to China. It'll fail in public perception and in the courts.

So come up with another idea because this one has exactly zero chance of becoming reality.
just like driving, welfare isn't a right. if you want it you do what the man tells you your going to do.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-07-2017, 08:22 PM   #124
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
I knew a guy doing research with 'gossypol' as a male long term contraception. I just checked and it looks like for 20% of the people it is not reversible. They have been / are using it in China...
all they need is a daily dose of salt peter. mission accomplished.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-07-2017, 10:13 PM   #125
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
just like driving, welfare isn't a right. if you want it you do what the man tells you your going to do.
You either don't get it or refuse to get it. Either way, it's like talking to a concrete block. It's unconstitutional and discriminatory and isn't going to happen.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-07-2017, 10:16 PM   #126
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
just like driving, welfare isn't a right. if you want it you do what the man tells you your going to do.
Brilliant. We don't tell women they aren't allowed to drive a car here. That's for some other countries, just like your idea.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-08-2017, 10:45 AM   #127
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
You either don't get it or refuse to get it. Either way, it's like talking to a concrete block. It's unconstitutional and discriminatory and isn't going to happen.
easy work around, just give the males a placebo and tell them it is temporary sterilization lol.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-13-2017, 10:56 PM   #128
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,786
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/04/1...ed-parenthood/

Now up to States

Trump signs bill
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-14-2017, 08:46 AM   #129
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-02-2017, 09:18 PM   #130
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,638
Planned Parenthood hired Fusion GPS to disprove hidden videos - probably cheaper paying snopes, but maybe they did that as well

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/2e82c44...ood-hired.html


there seems to be big money in writing propaganda fiction
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-23-2017, 01:06 AM   #131
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,638
Some people pushing for Planned Parenthood to get charged with trafficking of body parts.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11-...ody-parts.html
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-23-2017, 07:51 AM   #132
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
Some people pushing for Planned Parenthood to get charged with trafficking of body parts.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11-...ody-parts.html
Trump needs to fire Sessions and get someone in the position who is motivated and has a clue. This move would be another great Christmas gift to Americans.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-23-2017, 10:41 AM   #133
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,478
Boxcar you can not admit to being close to the base, from all your posts most would consider you as a tag along fellow. Don't automatically get defensive and instead follow with me for a bit. For starters the current law is a bit more complex that you or I would like to admit, and just how much is the President playing the press. I would suggest that the President has a mastery of the press and they are wearing bitch slippers, and Jefferson Beauregard Sessions is not out of sync with the President because things are not as they appear. I would further suggest that you and I do not have all the documents the Executive and Attorney General offices possess. We have our wants to what we expect, I can only tell you this administration by all indications will not be taking prisoners. As onlookers we can only view what plays out, right?
fast4522 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-23-2017, 11:26 AM   #134
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522 View Post
Boxcar you can not admit to being close to the base, from all your posts most would consider you as a tag along fellow. Don't automatically get defensive and instead follow with me for a bit. For starters the current law is a bit more complex that you or I would like to admit, and just how much is the President playing the press. I would suggest that the President has a mastery of the press and they are wearing bitch slippers, and Jefferson Beauregard Sessions is not out of sync with the President because things are not as they appear. I would further suggest that you and I do not have all the documents the Executive and Attorney General offices possess. We have our wants to what we expect, I can only tell you this administration by all indications will not be taking prisoners. As onlookers we can only view what plays out, right?
The only "base" I'm close to is Freedom Base.

Sessions has been warming a seat in the AG's office now for nearly a year, and of what judicial accomplishments can he boast? (Should we praise him for routinely enforcing existing immigration laws that are on the books?) Actions speak louder than words. Draining the Swamp necessarily entails a proactive Justice Department that isn't scared to prosecute criminal behavior. I would settle for an AG half as aggressive and proactive as Mueller & co., and Sessions doesn't even come close to that modest benchmark.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-23-2017, 11:37 AM   #135
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,478
If our current AG restores equal protection under the law he will be doing more than the office did during the Obama administration did. We can be critics all we want but without documents that are often under seal that is all we are right?
fast4522 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.