FBI Director press conference, 11am eastern

[Tom]

Remember back in 2009 when the Grand Mufti wanted to use a Blackberry, and it took tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars and almost an act of congress for him to get a beefed up version that was secure?

Now the Bitch buys on off the shelf and uses it in cyber-suspect countries where it was certainly breeched.


And you want this traitor to be the CNC?

What is the over/under on how many die in terror attack on our shore while she is in charge?

[Fager Fan]

Do liberals even understand what the issue is here?

She set up her own server for a reason. She could've had her phone secured just like Obama and others and used her gov email on her phone. If for some reason this didn't occur to her, which is 100% unlikely, then she would've just used a gmail or other normal mail account. Instead, she set up her email on her own server to have complete control over her email. And just as she anticipated, she was able to scrub her server of all the emails she didn't want the world to see.

In addition to gross negligence, she should be charged with destroying evidence.

Dems knew all along she wasn't going to be charged. How else would they allow her to get this far when they couldn't get another nominee on the ballot?

How do Dem voters reconcile this? This is without a doubt corruption at the highest level. Not just Hillary, but also the Administration, justice dept and FBI covering for this woman. Are Dems really able to accept and reward corruption by voting for her anyway? They should want ALL corrupt politicians out of office regardless of party.

[Saratoga_Mike]

She was just 2 MPH over the speed limit....

“Most voters will see this as Secretary Clinton doing 67 mph in a 65 mile zone and the officials say, ‘No ticket,’ ” said Bob Mulholland, a Chico, California-based Democratic consultant and convention superdelegate for Clinton

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...#storylink=cpy

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by Fager Fan

How do Dem voters reconcile this? This is without a doubt corruption at the highest level. Not just Hillary, but also the Administration, justice dept and FBI covering for this woman. Are Dems really able to accept and reward corruption by voting for her anyway? They should want ALL corrupt politicians out of office regardless of party.

They don't care. They have no principles.

Independents care. In the latest NBC New/WSJ poll, she trailed Trump by 10 percentage points among independents. In April, they were tied in that category. Does this "vindication" help her regain ground with independents, or does she lose additional ground, as she's viewed as corrupt by more and more voters?

[Clocker]

The Hillary campaign web site contains a section that purports to debunk all the 'lies' told about her. It has been updated to refute the 'lies' FBI Director Comey outlined in his press conference.

Comey better have a good retirement plan, because he is toast if Hillary gets elected.

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/brief...3/email-facts/

[Fager Fan]

What happened with Comey deserves some thought. I'm irritated with him because it seems obvious to me that he caved to pressure one way or another. He specifically said he wouldn't recommend prosecution when we all have been hearing how they're going to take the FBI's recommendation.

But I wonder if he tried to outfox them despite the pressure with laying out a clear cut case for why she should be prosecuted instead of the opposite. Now he gets called before congress and has to answer questions there which he knew was likely. He also knew he was giving evidence and soundbytes against her politically.

Maybe one day we'll know the truth though most politicians take it to the grave.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Fager Fan

Do liberals even understand what the issue is here?

.

[davew]

Originally Posted by Fager Fan

Do liberals even understand what the issue is here?

She set up her own server for a reason. She could've had her phone secured just like Obama and others and used her gov email on her phone. If for some reason this didn't occur to her, which is 100% unlikely, then she would've just used a gmail or other normal mail account. Instead, she set up her email on her own server to have complete control over her email. And just as she anticipated, she was able to scrub her server of all the emails she didn't want the world to see.

In addition to gross negligence, she should be charged with destroying evidence.

Dems knew all along she wasn't going to be charged. How else would they allow her to get this far when they couldn't get another nominee on the ballot?

How do Dem voters reconcile this? This is without a doubt corruption at the highest level. Not just Hillary, but also the Administration, justice dept and FBI covering for this woman. Are Dems really able to accept and reward corruption by voting for her anyway? They should want ALL corrupt politicians out of office regardless of party.

(corrupt) democrat politicians say what their flock want to hear - when they do not deliver it was the Repubs blocking them

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by Fager Fan

She set up her own server for a reason. She could've had her phone secured just like Obama and others and used her gov email on her phone. If for some reason this didn't occur to her, which is 100% unlikely, then she would've just used a gmail or other normal mail account. Instead, she set up her email on her own server to have complete control over her email. And just as she anticipated, she was able to scrub her server of all the emails she didn't want the world to see.

The vast right-wing conspiracy speculates that Hillary was as paranoid about the administration (i.e., Obama and Valerie Jarrett) reading her emails as about the right wingers.

[JustRalph]

Btw, the gal that Petreus gave the info to was a former Army officer who had a damn clearance.

Hillary provided the info to the world, including drone strike info and capabilities.

What happens when more of her emails start dribbling out all through the month of October?

[Spiderman]

Anyone here complain when Bush and Rove deleted 22 million emails held on the RNC server?

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemoc...type=3&theater

[Tom]

Step by step, tell us how the two incidents are the same.
Did Bush use multiple personal devices that were not protected?
How many were stamped as confidential, secret, etc.
Did he has a secret server in his basement?
Was there any evident state secrets were ever compromised?


Take some time to make a valid and intelligent argument that people can reasonably respond to it.

Or what you intent just a stupid drive by comment?

[Spiderman]

Originally Posted by Tom

Step by step, tell us how the two incidents are the same.
Did Bush use multiple personal devices that were not protected?
How many were stamped as confidential, secret, etc.
Did he has a secret server in his basement?
Was there any evident state secrets were ever compromised?


Take some time to make a valid and intelligent argument that people can reasonably respond to it.

Or what you intent just a stupid drive by comment?

You are missing the point that 22 million US Government emails were on the Republican National Committee server and were deleted. No one went on an extended witch hunt to find nuances of usage.

Answer to your questions: 1) they were the same to the extent that they were government emails and destroyed before the public could see them and learn whether they were classified or confidential or would later be labelled as classified.

2) Bush is looking much smarter with Drumpf in the picture. How many servers and other devices were used by the RNC? The knowledge of those details is elusive because emails were destroyed.

3) answer is again emails were destroyed

4) Wherever the RNC server was located. Bush is less complicit in this than the RNC, Rove in particular.

5) Again, emails were destroyed. Call your RINO in Congress to start an investigation.

[woodtoo]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

You are missing the point that 22 million US Government emails were on the Republican National Committee server and were deleted. No one went on an extended witch hunt to find nuances of usage.

Answer to your questions: 1) they were the same to the extent that they were government emails and destroyed before the public could see them and learn whether they were classified or confidential or would later be labelled as classified.

2) Bush is looking much smarter with Drumpf in the picture. How many servers and other devices were used by the RNC? The knowledge of those details is elusive because emails were destroyed.

3) answer is again emails were destroyed

4) Wherever the RNC server was located. Bush is less complicit in this than the RNC, Rove in particular.

5) Again, emails were destroyed. Call your RINO in Congress to start an investigation.

What a web we weave when we try to deceive. Not related.

[woodtoo]

Guccifer found dead in his jail cell.
.