The Democrat's Strategy

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

Face it. The deep state is dead. The IG buried it and FISA problems are a separate issue.

The IG released a biased report. You just have to look at the time period of what they checked.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Not, these issues were going to be settled in the courts, the Dems simply didn't want to take the time to do that.

After 6 years of litigation, The documents in question were not turned over by the Obama DOJ, but by the Trump DOJ.

So far the courts have agreed Trump ain't no friigin' king.
Going to the supreme's where he is hoping his boys will acquit the nitwit

[Tom]

Originally Posted by hcap

So far the courts have agreed Trump ain't no friigin' king.
Going to the supreme's where he is hoping his boys will acquit the nitwit

No, so far the courts have ruled on specific cases. Trump has won some and lost some.

Why do you feel the to outright LIE all the time?
Are you that much unsure of your beliefs aht you don't trust the truth?

How sad.
Do you cry at night?

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by hcap

Face it. The deep state is dead. The IG buried it and FISA problems are a separate issue.

I don't think you get it. In effect, the penny hasn't dropped in the gumball machine for you.

The fact is WASHINGTON D.C. IS POPULATED BY 'THE DEEP STATE.'

Below are the Washington D.C. 2016 election results.
As you can see the population there overwhelmingly voted for Hillary.
That is the population from which most Federal Employees are drawn from. The hiring pool is largely Democrat.
If anyone doesn't think that is a problem for all Republican Administrations, I'll sell him or her a bridge.
Washington D.C. is one big Deep State Swamp and will take generations to change.

The Washington D.C. 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
Candidate Popular vote Percentage
Hillary Clinton 282,830 ...... 90.86%
Donald Trump 12,723 ...... .. 4.09%

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Tom

No, so far the courts have ruled on specific cases. Trump has won some and lost some.

Why do you feel the to outright LIE all the time?
Are you that much unsure of your beliefs aht you don't trust the truth?

How sad.
Do you cry at night?

Wrong Looie. What a disusing ignorant confused little chump you are chimp.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by hcap

Wrong Looie. What a disusing ignorant confused little chump you are chimp.

The courts have ruled on various events.
You deny this?

Please, enlighten me - what is wrong in my statement.
Or was that just more of your irrational BS?

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Tom

The courts have ruled on various events.
You deny this?

Please, enlighten me - what is wrong in my statement.
Or was that just more of your irrational BS?

In Blow To White House, Federal Judge Rules That Don McGahn Must Testify

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/78270...to-white-house

Jackson declared in her 118-page ruling that "presidents are not kings" and that "no one is above the law."

"Absolute testimonial immunity for senior-level White House aides appears to be a fiction that has been fastidiously maintained over time through the force of sheer repetition," the judge wrote.

The ruling could have implications for other key witnesses, such as former national security adviser John Bolton, who has refused to testify until a federal court weighs in on the conflict between Congress and the White House.

How's about them apples Looie?

[woodtoo]

Aw chucks a day late and a dollar short for the Schiff Show.

[Tom]

That is exactly what I said it was a ruling on a case.
The fact that a bimbo moron justice would editorialize like that only show what a pos she is. She clearly is a biased BITCH ( catch that, Danny).

But I see why it made YOUR leg tingle.
Tee hee hee

btw. the REAL court may not agree with that - is that one of those Circus Court judges - you know, the ones who wear NEVER TRUMP tee shirts to work?

And, that is the words of one judge(?) not the COURTS.

Try again, Gollum.

[Lemon Drop Husker]

Originally Posted by hcap

In Blow To White House, Federal Judge Rules That Don McGahn Must Testify

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/78270...to-white-house

Jackson declared in her 118-page ruling that "presidents are not kings" and that "no one is above the law."

"Absolute testimonial immunity for senior-level White House aides appears to be a fiction that has been fastidiously maintained over time through the force of sheer repetition," the judge wrote.

The ruling could have implications for other key witnesses, such as former national security adviser John Bolton, who has refused to testify until a federal court weighs in on the conflict between Congress and the White House.

How's about them apples Looie?

You do realize that when, and if, the Dems ever win the POTUS again, you have set the stage for your own shitdom, right?

[Tom]

Originally Posted by woodtoo

Aw chucks a day late and a dollar short for the Schiff Show.

hcap had a bad week.
His Alexa committed suicide.
There herself in to a sink full of water.
Her last words were, "JHC, grow up dude! Arrrrrrrrgggggh! blub blub blub."

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Tom

That is exactly what I said it was a ruling on a case.
The fact that a bimbo moron justice would editorialize like that only show what a pos she is. She clearly is a biased BITCH ( catch that, Danny).

But I see why it made YOUR leg tingle.
Tee hee hee

btw. the REAL court may not agree with that - is that one of those Circus Court judges - you know, the ones who wear NEVER TRUMP tee shirts to work?

And, that is the words of one judge(?) not the COURTS.

Try again, Gollum.

This legal decisions will affect all cases where your moron king attempts to acts as a king. Why do you think he is appealing it to the Supremes?

The Limits and Implications of the McGahn Case on White House Aide Immunity
https://www.lawfareblog.com/limits-a...-aide-immunity

....This is another reason why administrations should take care not to invite the courts unless absolutely necessary to clarify the law governing these types of issues. By picking a poor case in which to test the national security exception, Trump has saddled the presidency with a narrow construction that it will have to contend with in other, future cases. And that case is on its way. The administration has chosen to stand its weak ground and appeal the Jackson decision, courting yet another loss but also one that would constitute controlling circuit precedent
.................................................
From the decision Looie.....

“Stated simply, the primary takeaway from the past 250 years of recorded American history is that presidents are not kings,” added the judge, an Obama appointee.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by hcap

This legal decisions will affect all cases where your moron king attempts to acts as a king. Why do you think he is appealing it to the Supremes?

Because that is the process. Guh.
And because he has done this before and WON before.
But YOU can't even accept that.

How sad you are.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Tom

Because that is the process. Guh.
And because he has done this before and WON before.
But YOU can't even accept that.

How sad you are.

Already told you...

Trump, Barr, Giuliani discussing their orange jumpsuits and cells up the river.
_

[barahona44]

Originally Posted by Greyfox

The fact is WASHINGTON D.C. IS POPULATED BY 'THE DEEP STATE.'

Below are the Washington D.C. 2016 election results.
As you can see the population there overwhelmingly voted for Hillary.
That is the population from which most Federal Employees are drawn from. The hiring pool is largely Democrat
[/COLOR][/B]

If you've ever been on I-95 in the D.C. area around rush hour (and consider yourself lucky if you never have), I think you would find a signifigant majority of federal employees live in Maryland and Virginia.