John Edwards gets caught....? Mistress and Baby?

[JustRalph]

Do you believe the National Enq. ?



SEN. JOHN EDWARDS CAUGHT WITH MISTRESS AND LOVE CHILD!
Vice Presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards was caught visiting his mistress and secret love child at 2:40 this morning in a Los Angeles hotel by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER!



http://www.nationalenquirer.com/



Refresh your memory from a past thread

http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=35162

[Greyfox]

[QUOTE=JustRalph]Do you believe the National Enq. ?

Alleged is not proof.

I am not a fan of this man in no way.

I have also lost respect for you pasting this allegation.

The National Enquirer has been more accurate than most people would believe.
It may well be that the story is true.
It may well be that peckers have no conscience.
It may well be that this man did what was accused.
JR throwing this out to us is beneath your normal performance.

So Why Would You Start This Thread and Why Would You Promulgate this allegation? Not that I personally give a shit about him?

[JustRalph]

[QUOTE=Greyfox]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

Do you believe the National Enq. ?

Alleged is not proof.

I am not a fan of this man in no way.

I have also lost respect for you pasting this allegation.

The National Enquirer has been more accurate than most people would believe.
It may well be that the story is true.
It may well be that peckers have no conscience.
It may well be that this man did what was accused.
JR throwing this out to us is beneath your normal performance.

So Why Would You Start This Thread and Why Would You Promulgate this allegation? Not that I personally give a shit about him?

It's on the front page of the Drudge Report. I think it's out??

You notice I question the purveyor of the info........... This could be big news in a few hours.......... well worth discussion.

[Tom]

He said there were two Americas, and he is getting action in both of them!

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by Tom

He said there were two Americas, and he is getting action in both of them!

That's right. A woman in each America. Sounds reasonable. Who wants to travel all the way across town to pick up a piece?

Boxcar

[rufus999]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

Do you believe the National Enq. ?

There's more reliable information on the backside.

rufus

[Marshall Bennett]

His wife has cancer and he's out screwin around . Lots of class here . I never liked the guy anyway . Piece of s*** !!!!

[Tom]

So that could give him the VP slot, to balance the ticket?

[JustRalph]

Slate has an interesting opine


http://www.slate.com/id/2195869/

[JustRalph]

Slate has an interesting opine


http://www.slate.com/id/2195869/

Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards "Love Child" Story

A double standard is at work.


Everybody had a good laugh last August when Roll Call broke the story about Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, getting arrested at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport for playing footsies in a toilet stall. The late-night talk show hosts mined the material for days; Slate produced a re-enactment of the bathroom ballet; and newspapers, magazines, and cable channels shredded Craig.

The angle taken by most reporters and commentators wasn't that Craig's restroom conduct was particularly shameful. The press doesn't object to same-sex sex at all, nor should it. Craig's true offense, said the press and the clowns, was hypocrisy, which they consider an inexcusable crime. Craig had supported both federal and Idaho bans on same-sex marriage, had opposed hate crime legislation that would extend protections to gays, and had earned a perfect 0 rating (PDF) from the Human Rights Campaign, a gay lobby. And he had denied and denied any and all gayness while trying to recruit some action in a bathroom!

Although the Craig story and the John Edwards story, currently unfolding thanks to the National Enquirer, aren't directly analogous, they have a bit in common. Edwards, too, may be a sex hypocrite. The tabloid called Edwards a cheater last October and the father of a love child in December, and last night the Enquirer posted a story about Edwards' visit to his alleged mistress and child at the Beverly Hilton on Monday night.

When the original Enquirer story about the affair with Rielle Hunter came out, Edwards categorically denied the relationship, stating: "The story is false. It's completely untrue, ridiculous." As he rejected the Enquirer's charges, Edwards was making his wife and their marriage a central component of his campaign. If Edwards had had no affair, he wasn't a hypocrite, not then and not now.

But if Edwards had an affair and lied about it, shouldn't he suffer scrutiny akin to that of Craig? At least three-dozen daily newspapers in the United States published the Craig news the day after the Roll Call scoop, according to Nexis, but this morning not a single U.S. daily mentioned the Enquirer piece

~more at the link~

[equicom]

1. Why does anyone care?
2. If his wife has cancer, that is *more* reason to have sex with somebody else, not less
3. The only thing this proves is that he likes having sex (like about 4 billion other folks, and untold numbers of marmosets).

[Marshall Bennett]

Originally Posted by equicom

1. Why does anyone care?
2. If his wife has cancer, that is *more* reason to have sex with somebody else, not less
3. The only thing this proves is that he likes having sex (like about 4 billion other folks, and untold numbers of marmosets).

Typical liberal attitude , as if he doesn't have a moral obligation . Thats the problem with 97% of liberals , no moral fiber . This is the type of garbage you folks try to put in the white house . As dumb as it gets without a doubt !!!

[Dave Schwartz]

...untold numbers of marmosets.

Priceless!

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by equicom

1. Why does anyone care?
2. If his wife has cancer, that is *more* reason to have sex with somebody else, not less
3. The only thing this proves is that he likes having sex (like about 4 billion other folks, and untold numbers of marmosets).

wow, your number 2 reason is just that.............number 2.

I gotta say I am with Marshall on this one..................

your reference to the "animal carnal instincts" is probably accurate

which means you make the point for Marshall. We are supposed to be above that level.

[JustRalph]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,391426,00.html


The LA Police are now looking into charges that the Hotel Security people broke the law, protecting Edwards. Oh what fun.........

Security Guard Confirms Late-Night Encounter Between Former Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters In Beverly Hills Hotel
Friday, July 25, 2008
A hotel security guard told FOXNews.com he intervened this week between a man he identified as former Sen. John Edwards and tabloid reporters who chased down the former presidential hopeful after what they're calling a rendezvous with his mistress and love child.

The Beverly Hilton Hotel guard said he encountered a shaken and ashen-faced Edwards — whom he did not immediately recognize — in a hotel men's room early Tuesday morning in a literal tug-of-war with reporters on the other side of the door.

"What are they saying about me?" the guard said Edwards asked.

"His face just went totally white," the guard said, when Edwards was told the reporters were shouting out questions about Edwards and Rielle Hunter, a woman the National Enquirer says is the mother of his child.

The guard said he escorted Edwards, who was not a registered guest at the hotel, out of the building after 2 a.m. Edwards did not say anything while he was escorted out, said the guard, adding that at times the reporters on the scene were "rough on him," sticking a camera in his face and shouting questions.

The guard did not recognize Edwards at the time of the incident, but said he concluded it was the 2008 presidential hopeful after hearing reports about the incident and finding an Enquirer reporter's notebook at the scene.

~more at the link~