Roe vs Wade struck down……..

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

I would pay insane amounts of money to watch you attack Mickey Rourke's gender to his face.

Insane...

Oh fuck...that was Mickey Rourke?

[TJDave]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

What are you worried about? Just move to a state that lets people get abortions at will. There will be plenty of those states still in existence, if indeed what you fear actually happens (it hasn't happened yet).

Now you sound like me...

I’m not worried about anything. I’ll be long dead when the current crop of unwanted children hit the streets.

Society will pay the price, however. I’m just disappointed I won’t be around to witness it.

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by Rex Phinney

I think you posted in the wrong thread?

This one is about abortion. You jumped to illegal immigration, then to the religion of said illegals, then to killing old people and then finished up by saying that I'm the sticking my head in the sand?????

Let's just call it like it is, this post is a mess.

Not at all. My post is all about you not wanting your taxes used in support of what some think to be expendable people, which goes much farther than just this current abortion issue. Pay attention to the possible ramifications of your reasoning behind your indifference toward what amounts to death of convenience, in most cases.

[Rex Phinney]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

Not at all. My post is all about you not wanting your taxes used in support of what some think to be expendable people, which goes much farther than just this current abortion issue. Pay attention to the possible ramifications of your reasoning behind your indifference toward what amounts to death of convenience, in most cases.

Why do I have to pick one or the other?


Does it make you feel better if I say that I don't want my taxpayer money going to pay for illegals either?


I never said anything about "expendable people" so quit twisting my comments into advocating killing off 75 year olds. I never said anything remotely close to that.


"Death of Convenience" isn't how I see it all, I view it as society stopping short of forcing people into parenthood who ARE TELLING YOU they aren't interested. We all seem to agree that societal degradation is a problem, who then would believe that spawning children to people who are willing to admit in advance they don't want them is a good idea??? That's sending you further down the rabbit hole.

[azeri98]

The Republicans were ready to take the house and senate, now I'm not so sure. this will get the Dems out to vote

[Marshall Bennett]

Whenever the tables are turned and the left loses, shit flies everywhere.
I've always been "pro-choice", but it was never an issue wiyj me. I hope Rowe is overturned however, its a message to the left that we're not tolerating their shit anymore. The education meltdown should be next, begin making the country morally stable again.
If Roberts flips and bows to the screaming garbage, I'll view him no differently than I would a Nazi general

[tbwinner]

Like Rex P, don't understand why this is a Top 5 issue for Rs.

This muddies the midterms immensely.

[mostpost]

Excellent article on just how poorly thought out Alito’s opinion is.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...explained.html

[PaceAdvantage]

No it won't...only to the hardcore...or those most likely to try and rig some votes...lol

So I guess if you look at it that way, it might be troubling

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Excellent article on just how poorly thought out Alito’s opinion is.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...explained.html

Or in other words, you don't like it, so it must be poorly thought out

[PaceAdvantage]

I've never seen Drudge so red...this must really be important!

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by xtb

Musty calls himself a Catholic. How does he reconcile that?

Very Simple. The first amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion.” What the Catholic Church thinks in this matter has no bearing.
I’ve stated this before. I am personally opposed to abortion, but my opinion has no bearing on the rights of others.
The only person whose opinion should matter is the women herself.

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Or in other words, you don't like it, so it must be poorly thought out

Whatever he doesn't like means it is good.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Or in other words, you don't like it, so it must be poorly thought out

It’s poorly thought out because it’s poorly thought out. He ignores the ninth Amendment which establishes that there are such things as unenumerated rights. He claims there is no right to an abortion because such a right was only granted fifty years ago, ignoring numerous other rights that didn’t exist until that did. Rights such as women’s suffrage. He says abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution therefore it cannot be a Constitutional right. Again I point you to the ninth amendment. And, I point out that the late 18th Century was not exactly a bastion of women’s rights.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Very Simple. The first amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion.” What the Catholic Church thinks in this matter has no bearing.
I’ve stated this before. I am personally opposed to abortion, but my opinion has no bearing on the rights of others.
The only person whose opinion should matter is the women herself.

Pretty much what the second amendment says, yet you whine about that one.