 |
|
10-27-2018, 08:39 PM
|
#2776
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,128
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker
Wow.
Are you OK?
I'm being serious. Are you really OK?
Kavanaugh is a SCOTUS member.
|
Impeach him. He's a witch.
|
|
|
|
10-27-2018, 08:44 PM
|
#2777
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker
Wow.
Are you OK?
I'm being serious. Are you really OK?
Kavanaugh is a SCOTUS member.
|
Perfectly fine.
I dont know why anyone cares about this honestly.
Look at it this way... if they order this investigation and then can't find enough evidence that shes lying to convict her of perjury... then that must mean she's telling the truth right? It certainly would to the opposition.
And *boom* you've just reopened that can of worms.
Just take the ugly W and move on.
Last edited by elysiantraveller; 10-27-2018 at 08:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2018, 08:47 PM
|
#2778
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Perfectly fine.
I dont know why anyone cares about this honestly.
Look at it this way... if they order this investigation and then can't find enough evidence that shes lying to convict her of perjury... then that must mean she's telling the truth right? It certainly would to the opposition.
And *boom* you've just reopened that can of worms.
Just take the ugly W and move on.
|
I am seriously concerned about you.
Do you have close friends and family that are nearby?
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2018, 08:51 PM
|
#2779
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker
I am seriously concerned about you.
Do you have close friends and family that are nearby?
|
Oh this is your new shtick when you don't have a response... got it.
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2018, 08:52 PM
|
#2780
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 5,597
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
What are you idiots talking about. It was a gif...
Personally I think Avenatti is a slimeball. I don't know what any of this matters. They are investigating her testimony. They have to prove she lied. In doing so that means they have to investigate her accusations... so like in the article you posted he's right.
I don't give a shit about any of this. I just find it funny after weeks of avoiding investigating Kavanaugh allegations pursuing this will start new investigations into them.
My God you people are dense or have some weird axe to grind.
|
Yeah, ok...you don't give a shit lmao....
Yet in the last 6 or so pages, TWENTY posts are yours!! lmao '
Just as I believe Mike to have said in another thread...TROLL!!
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed.
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2018, 08:57 PM
|
#2781
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtothegame
Yeah, ok...you don't give a shit lmao....
Yet in the last 6 or so pages, TWENTY posts are yours!! lmao '
Just as I believe Mike to have said in another thread...TROLL!!
|
I didn't realize it's taken 20 posts to try and explain to them what's actually happening based on their own articles...
|
|
|
|
|
10-28-2018, 11:12 AM
|
#2782
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,744
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtothegame
Yeah, ok...you don't give a shit lmao....
Yet in the last 6 or so pages, TWENTY posts are yours!! lmao '
Just as I believe Mike to have said in another thread...TROLL!!
|
Yeah, an in another thread, he was passing on the discussion.
Just before 18 more posts! 
I think he misspelled "passing."
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2018, 10:17 AM
|
#2783
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Perfectly fine.
I dont know why anyone cares about this honestly.
Look at it this way... if they order this investigation and then can't find enough evidence that shes lying to convict her of perjury... then that must mean she's telling the truth right? It certainly would to the opposition.
And *boom* you've just reopened that can of worms.
Just take the ugly W and move on.
|
What country and state/province were you born in and where do you live now?
|
|
|
|
10-29-2018, 11:05 AM
|
#2784
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
What country and state/province were you born in and where do you live now?
|
So this is the new thing people here do when they have no response to a complete rational explanation as to why opening another investigation could actually backfire...
K... got it.
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2018, 11:41 AM
|
#2785
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Here: Stuff this into your hash pipe, Mr. Rational, and puff on it: No big, elaborate, complex investigation is required to prove perjury. The only thing investigators have to examine is to see if there is contradictory testimony.
Example: Did this moonbat say at one time that she was in a room and actually witnessed something, and yet at another time say that she was not in the room to see anything? If so...this alone would be sufficient to convict on perjury. It's as simple as that.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2018, 12:05 PM
|
#2786
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Here: Stuff this into your hash pipe, Mr. Rational, and puff on it: No big, elaborate, complex investigation is required to prove perjury. The only thing investigators have to examine is to see if there is contradictory testimony.
Example: Did this moonbat say at one time that she was in a room and actually witnessed something, and yet at another time say that she was not in the room to see anything? If so...this alone would be sufficient to convict on perjury. It's as simple as that.
|
No it wouldn't.
One statement is under oath and the other isn't. You have to prove the one under oath is false.
So... therefore... you would have to actually investigate what she testified about. She can tell a media outlet whatever she wants.
Even Grassley is now admitting this and they've dropped it.
Like I said... if you investigate and don't find enough to discredit her story and that she perjured herself... you reopen a can of worms you didn't need to.
A simple risk-benefit example says this isn't the smartest move. Risks outweigh and rewards.
|
|
|
|
|
10-29-2018, 01:16 PM
|
#2787
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
No it wouldn't.
One statement is under oath and the other isn't. You have to prove the one under oath is false.
So... therefore... you would have to actually investigate what she testified about. She can tell a media outlet whatever she wants.
Even Grassley is now admitting this and they've dropped it.
Like I said... if you investigate and don't find enough to discredit her story and that she perjured herself... you reopen a can of worms you didn't need to.
A simple risk-benefit example says this isn't the smartest move. Risks outweigh and rewards.
|
An expert FBI interrogator could probably tie that airhead (and her empty suit mouthpiece) in knots in relatively short order. Then they could get her for lying to the FBI.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2018, 10:06 AM
|
#2788
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,744
|
Follow Up
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kav...efense-reports
Quote:
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh has reportedly turned down nearly $600,000 that had been raised in his name after sexual misconduct allegations were leveled against him during his confirmation process.
|
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2018, 11:05 AM
|
#2789
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
So this is the new thing people here do when they have no response to a complete rational explanation as to why opening another investigation could actually backfire...
K... got it.
|
I am sorry that you do not know where you came from or where you are now.
The dims will surely open another investigation if they win the house or the senate, but their star 'witnesses' will have already been investigated and they may have to find new ones...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
