Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-20-2010, 05:39 PM   #16
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if you like after the bell betting, you should take a look at today's 4th race at finger lakes, the 5 horse, cat's playmate leaves the gate at 4-1, unfortunately dennis carr falls off the horse, after the race you have your final odds of 12-1. of course the true odds after the poor rider falls off should 99 infinities-1, but unfortunately there are still guys like myself that are dead ducks who wind up being stuck with their bets.

i will update this board of further circumstances where there are withdrawells of money from parimutual wagering pools that seem to get swept under the rug.
Lambo...who were the horses that declined in price during the run of the race...that made this Dennis Carr horse move from 4-1 to 12-1?

Did the odds of the race winner drop suspiciously during the race?
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 05:43 PM   #17
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Lambo...who were the horses that declined in price during the run of the race...that made this Dennis Carr horse move from 4-1 to 12-1?

Did the odds of the race winner drop suspiciously during the race?
i didn't see them because i bet on the horse that lost his rider and i was sick as it was.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 06:07 PM   #18
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
4 horse is the one: 6-1 to 12-1. Post is up on HANA blog. Thanks for the heads up Lambo.

Attached Images
File Type: png Capture.PNG (17.1 KB, 200 views)

Last edited by DeanT; 09-20-2010 at 06:18 PM.
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 06:21 PM   #19
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanT
4 horse is the one: 6-1 to 12-1. Post is up on HANA blog. Thanks for the heads up Lambo.
i am not kidding you i saw 4-1.

you believe me on this one, this game ain't gonna last to much longer with this stuff going on. it is wearing me down already, and i don't think there are that many warriors that are as tough as me!
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 06:23 PM   #20
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
i am not kidding you i saw 4-1.

you believe me on this one, this game ain't gonna last to much longer with this stuff going on. it is wearing me down already, and i don't think there are that many warriors that are as tough as me!
I am not saying you did not. Even if you didnt and he was only 6-1; 6-1 to 12-1 and another horse going from 2-1 to even, represents an obvious problem. 4-1, or 6-1, no matter to me, nor it should not matter to anyone. We got problems, big time. When someone caps a 35% chance on the deuce, hammers it, then has a negative expectation bet, your game in the win pools is nothing but folly.

http://blog.horseplayersassociation....l-puzzles.html
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 06:39 PM   #21
senortout
Registered User
 
senortout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,128
Sooooooooooooo much bs. The odds on every other horse went up exponentially!........sometimes nothing is wrong. How many times have you tried to beat the favorite and decided you could not? This would be the proper thing to do then...either bet the favorite or pass the race. This is a hard lesson to learn though. Some people say go exotics to try to make something of the race. Your choice.
senortout is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 07:18 PM   #22
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by senortout
Sooooooooooooo much bs. The odds on every other horse went up exponentially!........sometimes nothing is wrong. How many times have you tried to beat the favorite and decided you could not? This would be the proper thing to do then...either bet the favorite or pass the race. This is a hard lesson to learn though. Some people say go exotics to try to make something of the race. Your choice.
i'll be sure to take your advice next time.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-20-2010, 08:35 PM   #23
senortout
Registered User
 
senortout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,128
Here are my wagers this day...I haven't skipped any races, just took em the way they came up. Slept in this am and bet the first two at Kempton, UK on my ipad before I even got outta bed. Did other things today, came back to racing when able, its my sanity release or something.

Note, 5 of these six horses won. I played place and show as you can see.

senortout

Attached Images
File Type: jpg my races, wagers, monday, sept 20, 2010.JPG (32.4 KB, 187 views)
senortout is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2010, 10:45 AM   #24
SchagFactorToWin
Registered User
 
SchagFactorToWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: WNY
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
If a horse starts the race at 2-1 odds, and its odds drop to 6-5 by the time the race is over...that's a drastic decline, but it would go unnoticed in your study.
I see. But like I said, that wasn't the goal of my study. I was looking specifically for the rate and which horses stay within certain odds ranges, 2:1 and under being one of them. What you're looking for would probably require a larger sample, though.
SchagFactorToWin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2010, 10:51 AM   #25
SchagFactorToWin
Registered User
 
SchagFactorToWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: WNY
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueShoe
A very high percentage of the time it is the runner that breaks very alertly and establishes a clear unchallenged early lead. A guy able to past post by only as little as 10 seconds after the break has a huge advantage, that is plenty of time to size up the break and enter a bet, provided the front runner is a legit contender, and not just a pop and stop longshot. Turn this around; how often do we see a sharp late odds drop on a horse that breaks slowly, gets shuffled back, and is pinned down along the rail in the early going? This happens all the time to short priced contenders, but somehow these runners almost never take the late price plunge.
One reason I started this study was to eliminate the use of anecdotal evidence. I know everyone thinks they know, but, especially in gambling, it is too easy to remember events that support one's theory and forget those that disprove it. Unless you are keeping track of when these past postings occur, it is my contention that it is idle speculation.

However, when it is applied to parimutual gambling, I think the more people who use such speculation to determine theirbets, the better (for me)!
SchagFactorToWin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2010, 10:53 AM   #26
SchagFactorToWin
Registered User
 
SchagFactorToWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: WNY
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if you like after the bell betting, you should take a look at today's 4th race at finger lakes, the 5 horse, cat's playmate leaves the gate at 4-1, unfortunately dennis carr falls off the horse, after the race you have your final odds of 12-1. of course the true odds after the poor rider falls off should 99 infinities-1, but unfortunately there are still guys like myself that are dead ducks who wind up being stuck with their bets.

i will update this board of further circumstances where there are withdrawells of money from parimutual wagering pools that seem to get swept under the rug.
As long as you also update us when it doesn't occur.
SchagFactorToWin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-21-2010, 12:33 PM   #27
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchagFactorToWin
As long as you also update us when it doesn't occur.
i stated before that it does not occur with NYRA, they know it goes on and if an outlet comes in with after the bell they are going to pull the signal from the place that it occurs. why do you think the handle in saratoga only went down 4%? its because they maintain i higher standard than the rest.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-22-2010, 02:09 AM   #28
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
i stated before that it does not occur with NYRA, they know it goes on and if an outlet comes in with after the bell they are going to pull the signal from the place that it occurs.
And you know this how?
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-22-2010, 10:45 PM   #29
therussmeister
Out-of-town Jasper
 
therussmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanT
I am not saying you did not. Even if you didnt and he was only 6-1; 6-1 to 12-1 and another horse going from 2-1 to even, represents an obvious problem. 4-1, or 6-1, no matter to me, nor it should not matter to anyone. We got problems, big time. When someone caps a 35% chance on the deuce, hammers it, then has a negative expectation bet, your game in the win pools is nothing but folly.

http://blog.horseplayersassociation....l-puzzles.html
Quite frankly, if you ignore the odds and just look at the amount bet on each horse minute-by-minute I don't see an obvious problem. The horse moving from 6-1 to 12-1 had his pool size double (approx.) while the win pool tripled.
__________________
“If you want to outwit the devil, it is extremely important that you don't give him advanced notice."

~Alan Watts
therussmeister is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-22-2010, 11:05 PM   #30
jamey1977
Registered User
 
jamey1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 249
S.O.B's Did It Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by therussmeister
Quite frankly, if you ignore the odds and just look at the amount bet on each horse minute-by-minute I don't see an obvious problem. The horse moving from 6-1 to 12-1 had his pool size double (approx.) while the win pool tripled.
Frickin Cheating Scum-Bags- Island Sunset - 3 to 1 off. At Fairplex Race 4 - Sep.22, 2010. Takes the lead and goes wire to wire. And of course after the race is over he is 2 to 1 . What the hell is going on ? . If the horse got off to a bad start. His final odds would have been 3 to 1 holding. This crap happens again and again. Who are the cheating scumbags who are doing this ?. This doesn't even happen half and half. 9 times out of 11. The winnning horse is way low after, the race. Only 2 times, they get taken but they do that just not to call attention to themselves. Stop these thieves. I should have gotten 8 dollars back. I am sick of this crap.
__________________
Winners Are Losers Who Got Up And Gave It One More Try.
jamey1977 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.