Supreme Court ruling....

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

"In the congressional case, they wiped away rulings in favor of House Democrats, ordering lower courts to more carefully consider concerns about the separation of powers.

The mixed rulings mean the American public is unlikely to learn about Trump’s financial records or tax information before November’s election."

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/09/supr...x-records.html

And this latter point is especially devastating to the dimwits because they were banking on getting those records in order to get Trump off the ballot in November. This was their last hope in "defeating" him apart from the ballot box. As you correctly said, it's not only unlikely...but I would say highly unlikely that they'll get the court to hear their case prior to the election.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by boxcar

And this latter point is especially devastating to the dimwits because they were banking on getting those records in order to get Trump off the ballot in November. This was their last hope in "defeating" him apart from the ballot box.

How would the disclosure of tax returns disqualify or remove Trump from the ballot? You're implying there is something untoward in said documents? As a Trump supporter, that's a dimwitted argument, one that your vainglorious ego will now attempt to obfuscate with a word salad of nothingness. I'll let you have the last word.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

How would the disclosure of tax returns disqualify or remove Trump from the ballot? You're implying there is something untoward in said documents? As a Trump supporter, that's a dimwitted argument, one that your vainglorious ego will now attempt to obfuscate with a word salad of nothingness. I'll let you have the last word.

The dimwits have been insisting that "there is something untoward in said documents", which is why they want to see them. (You haven't been paying attention all these months, have you?) But yet, I presented the "dimwitted argument" in all my "vainglorious ego"?

You liberals are a pathetic bunch! Hasn't anyone ever taught you how to think critically? (Rhetorical question.)

[Greyfox]

Jay Sekulow - Trump's legal Beagle wasn't so upset-

Following the rulings, Trump attorney Jay Sekulow sought to reframe both cases as victories. “We are pleased that in the decisions issued today, the Supreme Court has temporarily blocked both Congress and New York prosecutors from obtaining the President’s financial records,” Sekulow said in a statement to reporters. “We will now proceed to raise additional Constitutional and legal issues in the lower courts.”

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by Greyfox

Jay Sekulow - Trump's legal Beagle wasn't so upset-

Following the rulings, Trump attorney Jay Sekulow sought to reframe both cases as victories. “We are pleased that in the decisions issued today, the Supreme Court has temporarily blocked both Congress and New York prosecutors from obtaining the President’s financial records,” Sekulow said in a statement to reporters. “We will now proceed to raise additional Constitutional and legal issues in the lower courts.”

I strongly suspect the Trump team got the delay they wanted, knowing that the dimwits would have sold their souls to get this case in a court and get a ruling prior to the election. This is a case with a "shelf life". Wouldn't surprise me if the case is dropped...

[delayjf]

The mixed rulings mean the American public is unlikely to learn about Trump’s financial records or tax information before November’s election."

Prediction: His taxes will be leaked to the CNN, MSNBC etc soon.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Prediction: His taxes will be leaked to the CNN, MSNBC etc soon.

Not only that, a copy of them, marked up in red with "?" by certain lines will be included in every mail in ballot send out this fall.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by Tom

Not only that, a copy of them, marked up in red with "?" by certain lines will be included in every mail in ballot send out this fall.

[myohmyjustify]

It is not a crime to refuse to release your tax returns, unless it's President Trump who is the one doing it. Please let's cut the baloney. It's just another attempt to disenfranchise the millions of Americans who voted for him in 2016.

[MONEY]

Originally Posted by boxcar

I strongly suspect the Trump team got the delay they wanted, knowing that the dimwits would have sold their souls to get this case in a court and get a ruling prior to the election. This is a case with a "shelf life". Wouldn't surprise me if the case is dropped...

Souls

[46zilzal]

What did his previous lawyer (Dowd) tell him about his orange attire? One step closer

[barahona44]

This is an opportunity for the Democrats to "$peculate" on what's in those returns. And speculation is always worse than the actuality.Or maybe it's not in this case.Call it the Revenge of the Obama Birth Certificate.

I'm of the opinion that politicians should not have to voluntarily release their tax returns.And I'm also of the opinion that your opponents have the right to question that decision.

[davew]

Originally Posted by barahona44

This is an opportunity for the Democrats to "$peculate" on what's in those returns. And speculation is always worse than the actuality.Or maybe it's not in this case.Call it the Revenge of the Obama Birth Certificate.

I'm of the opinion that politicians should not have to voluntarily release their tax returns.And I'm also of the opinion that your opponents have the right to question that decision.

exactly, and as long as the dems hold the House, they will continue impeachment work as long as Trump is president.