|
|
12-01-2017, 09:13 AM
|
#46
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan
Also, a woman who subjects herself to Howard Stern can't realistically claim herself to be a delicate flower unable to deal with a pig. She willingly wallowed with one.
|
Sigh...
CHOOSING to go on a show vs. being harassed by your BOSS are two VERY different things.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 09:28 AM
|
#47
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MutuelClerk
The average age of a Fox News viewer is older than Methuselah isn't it? With bible in hand.
|
Older people are WISER
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 09:30 AM
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 11:41 AM
|
#49
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Sigh...
CHOOSING to go on a show vs. being harassed by your BOSS are two VERY different things.
|
Different things? Sure, in the legal sense. She can't charge Stern with sexually harassing her.
The point, which seemed to fly right over your head, is that anyone who chooses to go on Stern isn't exactly a delicate little flower who can't handle mentally men being lewd. So she can spare me and others if she claims someone being lewd to her caused her any mental distress.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 11:45 AM
|
#50
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek
|
This is a big so what.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 11:47 AM
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek
Older people are WISER
|
You mean like Nancy Pelosi or John McCain?
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 11:51 AM
|
#52
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
You mean like Nancy Pelosi or John McCain?
|
Sure. Imagine how stupid and annoying both must've been when they were younger.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 12:10 PM
|
#54
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan
This is a big so what.
|
So what? Pattern of treating women badly , that's what. He's a creep
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 12:22 PM
|
#55
|
clean money
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan
Different things? Sure, in the legal sense. She can't charge Stern with sexually harassing her.
The point, which seemed to fly right over your head, is that anyone who chooses to go on Stern isn't exactly a delicate little flower who can't handle mentally men being lewd. So she can spare me and others if she claims someone being lewd to her caused her any mental distress.
|
We may even be near one another on the spectrum of opinions about this general subject, but your logic here doesn't hold up beyond a character commentary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Sigh...
CHOOSING to go on a show vs. being harassed by your BOSS are two VERY different things.
|
well said.
We may choose to partake or try any number of things, but that choice doesn't sentence us to new boundaries.
You go on Stern, and there is a waiver to sign.
It's like suddenly finding out the secretary/accountant you foolishly hired for her smoking-hot looks, once went on stage at a gentelman's club. Fortunately for her/ unfortunately for you, you still have to abide by the current labor agreement. You don't get to tip her $1 bills throughout the day and leer...
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 12:57 PM
|
#56
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek
So what? Pattern of treating women badly , that's what. He's a creep
|
Yet it aired and not a mention by all the people watching at that time.
Maybe they, like me, think that if you go nude in a movie than you may have to take some comments about it. I've seen all sorts of comments made about men who were nude in movies, yet the men don't get upset about it.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 01:02 PM
|
#57
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
We may even be near one another on the spectrum of opinions about this general subject, but your logic here doesn't hold up beyond a character commentary.
well said.
We may choose to partake or try any number of things, but that choice doesn't sentence us to new boundaries.
You go on Stern, and there is a waiver to sign.
It's like suddenly finding out the secretary/accountant you foolishly hired for her smoking-hot looks, once went on stage at a gentelman's club. Fortunately for her/ unfortunately for you, you still have to abide by the current labor agreement. You don't get to tip her $1 bills throughout the day and leer...
|
You miss the point too. It's about a person's credibility. Don't try to tell anyone you are easily offended about lewd talk when you willingly sign up for it. It isn't going to be believed.
Back to the original assertion, she did NOTTTT leave to get away from the already fired Ayles. She went to the new gig for what was probably better money. But like others who make the wrong move professionally, and ultimately pay a bigger price than the pay hike they originally received, I predict the same happens with Kelly.
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 01:12 PM
|
#58
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
Geraldo is next
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 03:23 PM
|
#59
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
|
Quote:
Yet it aired and not a mention by all the people watching at that time.
|
If you are outraged when it happens, you are credible.
If you are not outraged until later on, you have no credibility.
You are piling on.
She was upset that Matt mentioned he saw her naked, but not enough to keep her clothes on.
I think there is a word for her.......
Matt may have done some rotten thing,s but this surely is not one of them.
This is piling on.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
12-01-2017, 06:20 PM
|
#60
|
Mad as hell !
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bridgeport, CT
Posts: 1,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|